Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical Distance in Corrupt Firms: How Do Innocent Bystanders Become Guilty Perpetrators?

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops the concept of the ‘continuum of destructiveness’ in relation to organizational corruption. This notion captures the slippery slope of wrongdoing as actors engage in increasingly dubious practices. We identify four kinds of individuals along this continuum in corrupt organizations, who range from complete innocence to total guilt. They are innocent bystanders, innocent participants, active rationalizers and guilty perpetrators. Traditional explanations of how individuals move from bystander status to guilty perpetrators usually focus on socialization and institutional factors. In addition to these factors, we propose that the very distance between an act and its ethical consequences (ethical distance) may also play a determining role – if not always in the same way – in the transition process. Having developed this conceptual argument, we conclude with a discussion of managerial and research implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich H. E. 1979 Organizations and Environments. Prentice Hall, Englew Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand V., Ashforth B. E., Joshi M. (2004) Business as Usual: The Acceptance and Perpetuation of Corruption in Organizations. Academy of Management Executive 18(2):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H. (1951) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth B. E., Anand V. (2003). The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 25:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandona A. (2003) Private-to-Private Corruption. Journal of Business Ethics 47(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audi R. (1988). Self-deception, Rationalizations and Reasons for Acting. In: B. McLaughlin, A. Rorty (eds). Perspectives on Self-Deception. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 92–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: 1990, `Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement', in W. Reich (ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 161–191)

  • Bauman Z. (1991) Modernity and the Holocaust. London: Polity

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenson A. (2003). The Number: How the Drive for Quarterly Earnings Corrupted Wall Street and Corporate America. New York: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass D. J., Butterfield K. D., Skaggs B. C. 1998 Relationships and Unethical Behaviour: A social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1):14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning C. R. 1992 The path to Genocide: Essays on Launching the Final Solution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratsis P. (2003) The Construction of Corruption, or Rules of Separation and Illusions of Purity in Bourgeois Societies. Social Text 21(4):9–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., R. T. Buttram and J. M. Dukerich: 2001, `Collective Corruption in the Corporate World: Toward a Process Model', in M. E. Turner (ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 471–499

  • Castrogiovani G. J. 1991 Environmental Munificence: A Theoretical Assesment. Academy of Management Review 16(4):542–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibnall S., Saunders P. (1977) Worlds Apart: Notes on the Social Reality of Corruption. The British Journal of Sociology 28(2):138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugh , D., M. R. Banaji and M. H. Bazerman: 2005, ‘Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest’, in Moore, D. A., M. Cain, G. Loewenstein and M. Bazerman (eds.), Conflicts of Interest: Problems and Solutions from Law, Medicine, and Organizational Settings (Cambridge University Press, London)

  • Cialdini R. B. (1996). Social Influence and the Triple Tumor Structure of Organizational Dishonesty. In D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds), Codes of Conduct. (pp. 44–58). New York: Russell Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark M. (ed) (1983). Corruption: Causes, Consequences and Control. New York: St Martins

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley J. M. (1992). Social Organization for the Production of Evil. Psychological Inquiry 3(2):199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley J. M. (1996). How Organizations Socialize Individuals into Evildoing. In D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds) Codes of Conduct. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.13–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P. and S. Zyglidopoulos: 2005, ‘The Escalation of Deception in Organziations’ (Paper presented at the OS summerwork shop in Santorini, Greece)

  • Gioia D. A. (1992). Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünfeld F.: 2000, ‘The Role of Bystanders in Human Rights Violations’, in Coomans et al. (eds.), Rendering Justice to The Vulnerable (Kluwer Law International, The Hague)

  • Haney C., W. C. Banks and P. G. Zimbardo: 1973, ‘Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison’, Naval Research Reviews (Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC), 9, 1–17

  • Jackall R. (1988). Moral mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford University Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeter L. W. (2003). Disconnected: Deceit and Betrayal at WorldCom. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman H. C., Hamilton V. L. (1989). Crimes of Obedience. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer R. M., Messick D. M. (1996). Ethical Cognition and the Framing of Organizational Dilemmas: Decision Makers as Intuitive Lawyers. In: D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds) Codes of Conduct. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 59–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G. (1996) Behavioral Decision Theory and Business Ethics: Skewed Trade-offs Between Self and Other. In D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.) Codes of Conduct. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 214–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli N. The Discourses, trans. Walker L. J. (Penguin, London)

  • McLean B., Elkind P. (2003). The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron. New York: Penguin Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick D. M., Bazerman M. H. (1996). Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making. Sloan Management Review 37(2):9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus J.R., Viswesvaran C. 2005 Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics 62(3):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S. (1974) Obedience and Authority. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Near J., Miceli M. (1995). Effective Whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review 20:679–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan J. T. 1989 Bribes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell G.: 1941/1982. ‘The Lion and the Unicorn’ (Penguin, London)

  • Schweitzer M. E., Ordânez L., Douma B. 2004 Goal Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior, Academy of Management Journal 47(3):422–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeulers, A.: 2002. What Transforms Ordinary People into Gross Human Rights Violators? (Paper presented ECPR, Torino)

  • Smeulers, A.:1986. Auschwitz and the Holocaust Through the Eyes of the Perpetrators, Driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de stichting Auschwitz. p. 23–55

  • Staub E. (1989). The Roots of Evil: The origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz M., Watkins S. (2003). Power Failure: The Inside Story if the Collapse of Enron. New York: Double Day

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (2004). Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behaviour. Social Justice Research 17(2):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A. (1990). Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn D. (1990). Autonomy, Interdependence and Social Control: NASA and the Space Shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly 25:225–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren D. E. (2003). Constructive and Destructive Deviance In Organizations. Academy of Management Review 28:622–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M.: 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Eds and Trans. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (Oxford University Press, New York)

  • Williams R. (ed) (2000). Explaining Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams O.F. (1998). ‘Other Peoples Money: A Study in Self Deception’, in O.F. Williams (ed.), The Moral Imagination: How Literature and Film can Stimulate Ethical Reflection in the Business World (University of Notre Dame Press)

  • Zyglidopoulos S. (1999). Initial environmental conditions and technological change. Journal of Management Studies 36(2):241–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stelios C. Zyglidopoulos.

Additional information

An Earlier version of this paper was presented at the The Twelfth Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics, New York, October 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zyglidopoulos, S.C., Fleming, P.J. Ethical Distance in Corrupt Firms: How Do Innocent Bystanders Become Guilty Perpetrators?. J Bus Ethics 78, 265–274 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9378-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9378-4

Keywords

Navigation