Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of long-term cumulative incidences based on short-term parametric model for competing risks: application in early breast cancer

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of parametric statistical models can be a solution to reduce the follow-up period time required to estimate long-term survival. Mould and Boag were the first to use the lognormal model. Competing risks methodology seems more suitable when a particular event type is of interest than classical survival analysis. The objective was to evaluate the ability of the Jeong and Fine model to predict long-term cumulative incidence. Survival data recorded by Institut Curie (Paris) from 4761 breast cancer patients treated and followed between 1981 and 2013 were used. Long-term cumulative incidence rates predicted by the model using short-term follow-up data were compared to non-parametric estimation using complete follow-up data. 20- or 25-year cumulative incidence rates for loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis predicted by the model using a maximum of 10 years of follow-up data had a maximum difference of around 6 % compared to non-parametric estimation. Prediction rates were underestimated for the third and composite event (contralateral or second cancer or death). Predictive ability of Jeong and Fine model on breast cancer data was generally good considering the short follow-up period time used for the estimation especially when a proportion of patient did not experience loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, Altman DG (2002) Survival plots of time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls. Lancet 359(9318):1686–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boag JW (1949) Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 11(1):15–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mould RF, Boag JW (1975) A test of several parametric statistical models for estimating success rate in the treatment of carcinoma cervix uteri. Br J Cancer 32(5):529–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mould RF, Lederman M, Tai P, Wong JKM (2002) Methodology to predict long-term cancer survival from short-term data using Tobacco Cancer Risk and Absolute Cancer Cure models. Phys Med Biol 47(22):3893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tai P, Yu E, Shiels R, Pacella J, Jones K, Sadikov E, Mahmood S (2005) Short-and long-term cause-specific survival of patients with inflammatory breast cancer. BMC Cancer 5(1):137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2011) The statistical analysis of failure time data, vol 360. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeong J-H, Fine J (2006) Direct parametric inference for the cumulative incidence function. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 55(2):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE et al (1999) Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 18(6):695–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Komoike Y, Akiyama F, Iino Y, Ikeda T, Akashi-Tanaka S, Ohsumi S, Kusama M, Sano M, Shin E, Suemasu K, Sonoo H, Taguchi T, Nishi T, Nishimura R, Haga S, Mise K, Kinoshita T, Murakami S, Yoshimoto M, Tsukuma H, Inaji H (2006) Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 106(1):35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choudhury JB (2002) Non-parametric confidence interval estimation for competing risks analysis: application to contraceptive data. Stat Med 21(8):1129–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saphner T, Tormey DC, Gray R (1996) Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy. J Clin Oncol 14(10):2738–2746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Somda SM, Leconte E, Boher J-M, Asselain B, Kramar A, Filleron T (2014) Optimal scheduling of post-therapeutic follow-up of patients treated for cancer for early detection of relapses. Stat Methods Med Res 0962280214524178. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567440

  14. Shi H, Cheng Y, Jeong J-H (2013) Constrained parametric model for simultaneous inference of two cumulative incidence functions. Biom J 55(1):82–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moreno-Betancur M, Rey G, Latouche A (2015) Direct likelihood inference and sensitivity analysis for competing risks regression with missing causes of failure. Biometrics 71(2):498–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, Pienkowski T, Martin M, Press M, Mackey J, Glaspy J, Chan A, Pawlicki M et al (2011) Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 365(14):1273–1283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sy JP, Taylor JM (2000) Estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model. Biometrics 56(1):227–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersson TM, Dickman PW, Eloranta S, Lambert PC (2011) Estimating and modelling cure in population-based cancer studies within the framework of flexible parametric survival models. BMC Med Res Methodol 11(1):96

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi KC, Zhou X (2002) Large sample properties of mixture models with covariates for competing risks. J Multivar Anal 82(2):331–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolaie MA, van Houwelingen HC, Putter H (2010) Vertical modeling: a pattern mixture approach for competing risks modeling. Stat Med 29(11):1190–1205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from “La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, comite Midi-Pyrénées,” the GRICR (Groupe de Recherche Institut Claudius Regaud). JP Delord was partly supported by the CAPTOR academic Project: ANR-11-PHUC-0001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Filleron.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 182 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabarrou, B., Belin, L., Somda, S.M. et al. Prediction of long-term cumulative incidences based on short-term parametric model for competing risks: application in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 156, 577–585 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3789-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3789-9

Keywords

Navigation