Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic predictors of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in a SWOG phase III intergroup adjuvant breast cancer treatment trial (S0221)

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taxanes have resulted in improved survival for breast cancer patients, but often cause neurological toxicities. Identification of biomarkers related to toxicities could be important for dictating treatment regimen. We evaluated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Fanconi Anemia (FA)/BRCA pathway in relation to grade 3/4 neurotoxicities in patients (n = 888) from SWOG0221, a phase III adjuvant trial for breast cancer of 4 dose/schedules of cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (A), and paclitaxel (T). In a separate cohort, we measured the correlation of significant FANCD2 SNPs with corresponding gene expression. For FANCD2, permutation testing revealed that 4 (out of 20) SNPs were significantly associated with an almost two-fold increased risk of toxicity. Two FANCD2 haplotypes were also associated with neurological toxicity, with odds ratios (OR) in the overall population of 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3, 2.5) and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2, 2.4). Although numbers were small, an African-American-specific haplotype was associated with an almost 3-fold increase in risk of neurologic toxicity (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.2, 6.9). Expression analyses revealed that significant FANCD2 SNPs were associated with FANCD2 expression levels (P = 0.03). There were no associations between SNPs in BRCA1 and neurotoxicities. In this trial of CA+T for breast cancer, SNPs in FANCD2, but not in BRCA1, were associated with a 70–80% increase in the odds of grade 3/4 neurological toxicities and increased expression of the gene. If replicated, women with these genotypes should be closely monitored for toxicities and could be targeted for preventive measures or alternative therapeutic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ et al (2003) Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:976–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky B, Fehrenbacher L, Sedlacek SM et al (2005) Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol 23:3686–3696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J, Pawlicki M, Guastalla JP et al (2005) Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2302–2313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roché H, Fumoleau P, Spielmann M, Canon JL, Delozier T et al (2006) Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial. J Clin Oncol 24:5664–5671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perez EA (2005) TAC—a new standard in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer? N Engl J Med 352:2346–2348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JJ, Swain SM (2006) Peripheral neuropathy induced by microtubule-stabilizing agents. J Clin Oncol 24:1633–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McGrogan BT, Gilmartin B, Carney DN, McCann A (2008) Taxanes, microtubules and chemoresistant breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1785:96–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang RH, Yu H, Deng CX (2004) A requirement for breast-cancer-associated gene 1 (BRCA1) in the spindle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17108–17113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Branham MT, Nadin SB, Vargas-Roig LM, Ciocca DR (2004) DNA damage induced by paclitaxel and DNA repair capability of peripheral blood lymphocytes as evaluated by the alkaline comet assay. Mutat Res 560:11–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalton WB, Nandan MO, Moore RT, Yang VW (2007) Human cancer cells commonly acquire DNA damage during mitotic arrest. Cancer Res 67:11487–11492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swanton C, Nicke B, Schuett M, Eklund AC, Ng C et al (2009) Chromosomal instability determines taxane response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8671–8676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Quinn JE, Kennedy RD, Mullan PB, Gilmore PM, Carty M et al (2003) BRCA1 functions as a differential modulator of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 63:6221–6228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy RD, Quinn JE, Mullan PB, Johnston PG, Harkin DP (2004) The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1659–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Andrea AD, Grompe M (2003) The Fanconi anaemia/BRCA pathway. Nat Rev Cancer 3:23–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy RD, D’Andrea AD (2005) The Fanconi Anemia/BRCA pathway: new faces in the crowd. Genes Dev 19:2925–2940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkitaraman AR (2004) Tracing the network connecting BRCA and Fanconi anaemia proteins. Nat Rev Cancer 4:266–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huen MS, Sy SM, Chen J (2010) BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:138–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M et al (2005) Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1180–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J et al (2002) The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296:2225–2229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai HJ, Choudhry S, Naqvi M, Rodriguez-Cintron W, Burchard EG et al (2005) Comparison of three methods to estimate genetic ancestry and control for stratification in genetic association studies among admixed populations. Hum Genet 118:424–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Werness BA, Ramus SJ, DiCioccio RA, Whittemore AS, Garlinghouse-Jones K et al (2004) Histopathology, FIGO stage, and BRCA mutation status of ovarian cancers from the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry. Int J Gynecol Pathol 23:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang HQ, Brady MF, Cella D, Fleming G (2007) Validation and reduction of FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale for platinum/paclitaxel-induced neurologic symptoms: a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang W (2007) Emergence of a DNA-damage response network consisting of Fanconi anaemia and BRCA proteins. Nat Rev Genet 8:735–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen CC, Taniguchi T, D’Andrea A (2007) The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway confers glioma resistance to DNA alkylating agents. J Mol Med 85:497–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Institute of Health (NIH) R01 CA116395, and the following PHS Cooperative Agreement grant numbers awarded by the National Cancer Institute, DHHS: CA32102, CA38926, CA63844, CA63845, CA 20319, CA46282, CA46441, CA35261, CA63848, CA67575, CA14028, CA35281, CA128567, CA45560, CA58882, CA13612; CA46368, CA45808, CA58658, CA76447, CA37981, CA04919; CA95860; CA27057, CA42777, CA22433, CA74647, CA86780, CA68183, CA58861, CA45807, CA35192, CA35178, CA58416, CA35176, CA67663, CA35431, CA12644, CA16385, CA11083, CA45377, CA35128, CA35262, CA52654, CA76429, CA58723, CA46113, CA76132, CA45450, CA35119, CA45461, CA21115, CA21076, CA77597, CA25224, CA77202, CCSRI 15469, and in part by Amgen, Inc. The Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) Genomics Core Facility is a CCSG Shared Resource (NIH P30 CA016056-27). Support was also provided by the Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale (DFH) and Drs. Ambrosone, Gralow, Hayes, Hershman, and Hortobagyi are recipients of funding from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Funding agencies had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, or in the writing of the report and submission. We acknowledge and thank Dr. Frank L. Meyskens, Jr., M.D., Associate Chair for the Cancer Control & Prevention Committees of the Southwest Oncology Group, for his administrative support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lara E. Sucheston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sucheston, L.E., Zhao, H., Yao, S. et al. Genetic predictors of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in a SWOG phase III intergroup adjuvant breast cancer treatment trial (S0221). Breast Cancer Res Treat 130, 993–1002 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1671-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1671-3

Keywords

Navigation