Abstract
Large-eddy simulations of the neutrally-stratified flow over an extended homogeneous forest were used to calibrate a canopy model for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RaNS) method with the \(k-\varepsilon \) turbulence model. It was found that, when modelling the forest as a porous medium, the canopy drag dissipates the turbulent kinetic energy (acts as a sink term). The proposed model was then tested in more complex flows: a finite length forest and a forested hill. In the finite length forest, the destruction of the turbulent kinetic energy by the canopy was overestimated near the edge, for a length approximately twice the tree height. In the forested hill, the model was less accurate inside the recirculation zone and overestimated the turbulent kinetic energy, due to an incorrect prediction of the production term. Nevertheless, the canopy model presented here provided consistent results in both a priori and a posteriori tests and improved the accuracy of RaNS simulations with the \(k-\varepsilon \) model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayotte K, Finnigan J, Raupach M (1999) A second-order closure for neutrally stratified vegetative canopy flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:189–216
Belcher S, Harman I, Finnigan J (2012) The wind in the willows: flows in forest canopies in complex terrain. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:479–504
Beljaars A, Walmsley J, Taylor P (1987) A mixed spectral finite-difference model for neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over roughness changes and topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 38:273–303
Calaf M, Meneveau C, Meyers J (2010) Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys Fluids 22(015):110
Dupont S, Brunet Y (2008) Edge flow and canopy structure: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126:51–71
Dupont S, Brunet Y (2009) Coherent structures in canopy edge flow: a large-eddy simulation study. J Fluid Mech 630:93–128
Dupont S, Patton E (2012) Influence of stability and seasonal canopy changes on micrometeorology within and above an orchard canopy: the CHATS experiment. Agric For Meteorol 157:11–29
Dupont S, Brunet Y, Finnigan J (2008) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a forested hill: validation and coherent structure identification. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134:1911–1929
Dwyer M, Patton E, Shaw R (1997) Turbulent kinetic energy budgets from a large-eddy simulation of airflow above and within a forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 84:23–43
Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571
Finnigan J, Shaw R, Patton E (2009) Turbulence structure above a vegetation canopy. J Fluid Mech 637:387–424
Foudhil H, Brunet Y, Caltagirone JP (2005) A fine-scale \(k\)–\(\varepsilon \) model for atmospheric flow over heterogeneous landscapes. Environ Fluid Mech 5:247–265
Green S (1992) Modelling turbulent air flow in a stand of widely-spaced trees. PHOENICS. J Comput Fluid Dyn Appl 5:294–312
Harman I, Finnigan J (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:339–363
Jones W, Launder B (1972) The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transf 15:301–314
Katul G, Mahrt L, Poggi D, Sanz C (2004) One- and two-equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113:81–109
Liu J, Chen J, Black T, Novak M (1996) \(E\)–\(\varepsilon \) modelling of turbulent air flow downwind of a model forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 77:21–44
Mansour N, Kim J, Moin P (1988) Reynolds-stress and dissipation-rate budgets in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 194:15–44
Marusic I, Kunkel G, Porté-Agel F (2001) Experimental study of wall boundary conditions for large-eddy simulation. J Fluid Mech 446:309–320
Mason P, Thomson D (1992) Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulations of boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 242:51–78
Meneveau C, Lund T, Cabot W (1996) A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J Fluid Mech 319:353–385
Mohammadi B, Pironneau O (1994) Analysis of the K–epsilon turbulence model, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken, 194 pp
Murakami S (1993) Comparison of various turbulence models applied to a bluff body. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46–47:21–36
Patton E, Katul G (2009) Turbulent pressure and velocity perturbations induced by gentle hills covered with sparse and dense canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 133:189–217
Patton E, Horst T, Sullivan P, Lenschow D, Oncley S, Brown W, Burns S, Guenther A, Held A, Karl T, Mayor S, Rizzo L, Spuler S, Sun J, Turnipseed A, Allwine E, Edburg S, Lamb B, Avissar R, Calhoun R, Kleissl J, Massman W, Paw UK, Weil J (2011) The canopy horizontal array turbulence study. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92:593–611
Piomelli U, Balaras E (2002) Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:349–374
Raupach M (1994) Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as functions of canopy height and area index. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71:211–216
Raupach M, Shaw R (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79–90
Raupach M, Thom A, Edwards I (1980) A wind-tunnel study of turbulent flow close to regularly arrayed rough surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18:373–397
Raupach M, Finnigan J, Brunei Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382
Sanz C (2003) A note on \(k\)-\(\varepsilon \) modelling of vegetation canopy air-flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108:191–197
Shaw R, Patton E (2003) Canopy element influences on resolved- and subgrid-scale energy within a large-eddy simulation. Agric For Meteorol 115:5–17
Shaw R, Pereira A (1982) Aerodynamic roughness of a plant canopy: a numerical experiment. Agric Meteorol 26:51–65
Shaw R, Schumann U (1992) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61:47–64
Silva Lopes A, Palma J (2002) Numerical simulation of isotropic turbulence using a collocated approach and a nonorthogonal grid system. J Comput Phys 175:713–738
Silva Lopes A, Piomelli U, Palma J (2006) Large-eddy simulation of the flow in an S-duct. J Turbul 7:N11
Silva Lopes A, Palma J, Castro F (2007) Simulation of the Askervein flow. Part 2: large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125:85–108
Sogachev A, Panferov O (2006) Modification of two-equation models to account for plant drag. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121:229–266
Svensson U, Häggkvist K (1990) A two-equation turbulence model for canopy flows. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 35:201–211
Wilson J (1988) A second-order closure model for flow through vegetation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42:371–392
Yang B, Morse A, Shaw R, Paw UK (2006a) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part II: momentum and turbulent kinetic energy budgets. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121:433–457
Yang B, Raupach M, Shaw R, Paw UK, Morse A (2006b) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part I: flow statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120:377–412
Yue W, Parlange M, Meneveau C, Zhu W, van Hout R, Katz J (2007) Large-eddy simulation of plant canopy flows using plant-scale representation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:183–203
Acknowledgments
A. Silva Lopes and J. Viana Lopes are research fellows under Programa Ciência of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). These research activities were developed as part of the work program of the Center for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Studies, a unit of the Portuguese research network, sponsored by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lopes, A., Palma, J.M.L.M. & Lopes, J.V. Improving a Two-Equation Turbulence Model for Canopy Flows Using Large-Eddy Simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 149, 231–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9850-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9850-x