Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative activities of soil enzymes involved in mineralizing organic carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) reveal stoichiometric and energetic constraints on microbial biomass growth. Although tropical forests and grasslands are a major component of the global C cycle, the effects of soil nutrient availability on microbial activity and C dynamics in these ecosystems are poorly understood. To explore potential microbial nutrient limitation in relation to enzyme allocation in low latitude ecosystems, we performed a meta-analysis of acid/alkaline phosphatase (AP), β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), and β-1,4-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities in tropical soils. We found that BG:AP and NAG:AP ratios in tropical soils are significantly lower than those of temperate ecosystems overall. The lowest BG:AP and NAG:AP ratios were associated with old or acid soils, consistent with greater biological phosphorus demand relative to P availability. Additionally, correlations between enzyme activities and mean annual temperature and precipitation suggest some climatic regulation of microbial enzyme allocation in tropical soils. We used the results of our analysis in conjunction with previously published data on soil and biomass C:N:P stoichiometry to parameterize a biogeochemical equilibrium model that relates microbial growth efficiency to extracellular enzyme activity. The model predicts low microbial growth efficiencies in P-limited soils, indicating that P availability may influence C cycling in the highly weathered soils that underlie many tropical ecosystems. Therefore, we suggest that P availability be included in models that simulate microbial enzyme allocation, biomass growth, and C mineralization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD (2006) Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes. Biogeochemistry 81:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin A, Vitousek P (1998) Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawai’i. Oecologia 113:519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barantal S, Schimann H, Fromin N, Hattenschwiler S (2012) Nutrient and carbon limitation on decomposition in an Amazonian moist forest. Ecosystems 15:1039–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (eds) (2006) The Nature and Properties of Soils. Prentice Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) (2011) Phosphorus in Action: Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick O, Derry L, Vitousek P, Huebert B, Hedin L (1999) Changing sources of nutrients during four million years of ecosystem development. Nature 397:491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharman LC (1994) Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecol Monogr 64:149–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (eds) (2002) Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland C, Liptzin D (2007) C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland C, Townsend A, Taylor P, Alvarez-Clare S, Bustamante M, Chuyong G et al (2011) Relationships among net primary productivity nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan-tropical analysis. Ecol Lett 14:939–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crews T, Kitayama K, Fownes J, Riley R, Herbert D, Mueller-Dombois D et al (1995) Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Ecology 76:1407–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack DF, Chou WW, Yang WH, Harmon ME, Silver WL, and the LIDET Team (2009) Controls on long-term root and leaf litter decomposition in neotropical forests. Global Change Biology 15:1339–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey SD, Lee J, Melillo JM, Six J (2013) The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1796

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway J, Dentener F, Capone D, Boyer E, Howarth R, Seitzinger S et al (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past present and future. Biogeochemistry 70:153–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin L (2004) Global organization of terrestrial plant-nutrient interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10849–10850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105:367–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy E, Jackson R (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Frizano J, Vann D (2003) Biogeochemical implications of labile phosphorus in forest soils determined by the Hedley fractionation procedure. Oecologia 135:487–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspari M, Garcia M, Harms K, Santana M, Wright S, Yavitt J (2008) Multiple nutrients limit litterfall and decomposition in a tropical forest. Ecol Lett 11:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology. Number 20 in Developments in Environmental Modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  • Luyssaert S, Inglima I, Jung M, Richardson A, Reichstein M, Papale D et al (2007) CO2 balance of boreal temperate and tropical forests derived from a global database. Glob Change Biol 13:2509–2537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Grace J (2000) Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Trends Ecol Evol 15:332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Porporato A (2007) A theoretical analysis of nonlinearities and feedbacks in soil carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1542–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Trofymow J, Jackson R, Porporato A (2010) Stoichiometric controls on carbon nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr 80:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, Porporato A, Ågren G (2012) Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli L, Piccolo M, Townsend A, Vitousek P, Cuevas E, McDowell W et al (1999) Nitrogen stable isotopic composition of leaves and soil: tropical versus temperate forests. Biogeochemistry 46:45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill W, Cole C (1981) Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C N S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead D, Sinsabaugh R (2006) A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol Monogr 76:151–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardoto G, Ometto J, Ehleringer J, Higuchi N, Bustamante M, Martinelli L (2008) Understanding the influences of spatial patterns on N availability within the Brazilian Amazon forest. Ecosystems 11:1234–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nottingham AT, Turner BL, Chamberlain PM, Stott AW, Tanner EVJ (2012) Priming and microbial nutrient limitation in lowland tropical soils of contrasting fertility. Biogeochemistry 111:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49:175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posada J, Schuur E (2011) Relationships among precipitation regime nutrient availability and carbon turnover in tropical rain forests. Oecologia 165:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed S, Vitousek P, Cleveland C (2011) Are patterns in nutrient limitation belowground consistent with those aboveground: results from a 4 million year chronosequence. Biogeochemistry 106:323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin R, Legendre L (2001) Biogenic carbon cycling in the upper ocean: effects of microbial respiration. Science 291:2398–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell J, Cook G (1995) Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions. Microbiol Rev 59:48–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago LS, Schuur EAG, Silvera K (2005) Nutrient cycling and plant-soil feedbacks along a precipitation gradient in lowland Panama. J Trop Ecol 21:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer EJ, Heard MS, Grant HK, Marthews TR, Tanner EVJ (2011) Soil carbon release enhanced by increased tropical forest litterfall. Nature Clim Change 1:304–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel J, Weintraub M (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuur EAG, Matson PA (2001) Net primary productivity and nutrient cycling across a mesic to wet precipitation gradient in Hawaiian montane forest. Oecologia 128:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh R, Follstad Shah J (2011) Ecoenzymatric stoichiometry of recalcitrant organic matter decomposition: the growth rate hypothesis in reverse. Biogeochemistry 102:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh R, Follstad Shah J (2012) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and ecological theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:313–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh R, Lauber C, Weintraub M, Ahmed B, Allison S, Crenshaw C et al (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh R, Hill B, Shah J (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeck N (1985) Phosphorus dynamics in soils and landscapes. Geoderma 36:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollins P, Robertson GP, Uehara G (1988) Nutrient mobility in variable- and permanent-charge soils. Biogeochemistry 6:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Atmosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner EVJ, Vitousek PM, Cuevas E (1998) Experimental investigation of nutrient limitation of forest growth on wet tropical mountains. Ecology 79:10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian H, Melillo J, Kicklighter D, McGuire A, Helfrich J, Moore B et al (1998) Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems. Nature 396:664–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993) Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend AR, Cleveland CC, Houlton BZ, Alden CB, White JWC (2011) Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle. Front Ecol Environ 9:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CL, Bell J, Pendall E, Ogle K (2013) Does declining carbon-use efficiency explain thermal acclimation of soil respiration with warming? Glob Chang Biol 19:252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Engelbrecht BMJ (2011) Soil organic phosphorus in lowland tropical rainforests. Biogeochemistry 103:297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Farrington H (1997) Nutrient limitation and soil development: experimental test of a biogeochemical theory. Biogeochemistry 37:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker T, Syers J (1976) The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring B (2012) A meta-analysis of climatic and chemical controls on leaf litter decay rates in tropical forests. Ecosystems 15:999–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieder W, Cleveland C, Townsend A (2009) Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90:3333–3341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S, Yavitt J, Wurzburger N, Turner B, Tanner E, Sayer E et al (2011) Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology 92:1616–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Thornton PE, Post WM (2012) A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial systems. Global Ecology and Biogeography (accepted)

  • Yang X, Post WM (2011) Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: a synthesis of soil phosphorus data using the Hedley fractionation method. Biogeosciences 8:2907–2916

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Peyton Smith and Colin Averill for thoughtful discussions related to the manuscript. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie Grace Waring.

Additional information

Re-submitted to Biogeochemistry for the special feature ‘enzymes in biogeochemical cycles’, 4 April 2013.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waring, B.G., Weintraub, S.R. & Sinsabaugh, R.L. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils. Biogeochemistry 117, 101–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9849-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9849-x

Keywords

Navigation