Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gene flow connects key leopard (Panthera pardus) populations despite habitat fragmentation and persecution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The leopard (Panthera pardus) is facing the threat of continued population decline across its range. In order to inform more effective conservation management programs, genetic information is needed from leopard populations that persist in previously unstudied, isolated and highly fragmented protected areas. The aim of this study was to explore the population structure and genetic diversity of leopard populations across the Mpumalanga province of South Africa. We collected a total of 33 leopard samples from four major locations along a west to east transect across the province. We analysed 17 polymorphic microsatellites and two regions of the mitochondrial genome (NADH-5 and Cytb) to determine the genetic structure of the leopard population in the province. We also calculated genetic diversity indices and explored gene flow in the region. We found that while there is gene flow occurring across the province, the population was genetically structured. We identified two major population units that we describe as ‘West Mpumalanga’ and ‘East Mpumalanga’. Gene flow was moderate between the two populations and we found very high genetic diversity levels compared to other leopard populations previously studied in South Africa. From a conservation perspective, our results show that gene flow is still occurring across seemingly isolated leopard populations that exist in fragmented landscapes, highlighting the importance of all leopard populations in South Africa. Management authorities need to focus conservation efforts on maintaining corridors between regions that are suitable for leopard occupancy and work closely with human settlements to minimise human-leopard conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All mtDNA strands have been uploaded to Genbank under the following accession numbers;  NADH-5 : OQ132962-OQ132992 & Cytochrome B : OQ117400-OQ117430. Microsatellite data were uploaded to Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21743852); There are no restrictions on data availability.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency for their support, especially Gerrie Camacho, Delecia Gunn, Ernest Rohm, Gerhardus Sterk and Chris Hobkirk their expertise input, assistance and time sacrificed for leopard captures. They would also like to thank Jannie Du Bruyn, Dr. Hannes Botha, Tommie Steyn, Juan De Beer & Johan Eksteen for their technical support and advice during the project. Thanks to Dr. Philip Stott for his input into the project development. Thanks also to the students Herman Viviers, Tora-Lee Axelson, Max Peters, Parris Jeffries, Marco Gouws and Olivia Rynders who assisted with field work activities. This study was funded from PhD student operating funds available from the School of Animal and Veterinary Science at The University of Adelaide.

Funding

This study was funded from PhD student operating funds available from the School of Animal and Veterinary Science at The University of Adelaide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors had input to the overall project research design. Field work research and sample collection was performed by DRM, JC, GS, FP & JW. JW contributed genetic samples for analysis. Data analysis was performed by DRM & YM. The paper was written by DRM with large input from YM, TJM & WSJB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Declan R. Morris.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was received from the University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committee (S-2016-023) and the permit to conduct research on Loskop Dam Nature Reserve was given by the provincial municipality Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency (TS3/11).

Consent for publication

All authors give their consent to the publication of this article.

Additional information

Communicated by Lilly O. Rodriguez.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1042 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morris, D.R., McWhorter, T.J., Boardman, W.S.J. et al. Gene flow connects key leopard (Panthera pardus) populations despite habitat fragmentation and persecution. Biodivers Conserv 32, 945–963 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02531-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02531-5

Keywords

Navigation