Abstract
Amazonia has an iconic status in global conservation due to its enormous area and vast stores of biodiversity. Nevertheless, much of its biodiversity remains unknown, and many of the region’s forests are under threat of habitat loss due to deforestation and climatic instability. Based on the assumption that effective management and conservation of forest resources should be supported by geographically localized scientific knowledge, we mapped the spatial and temporal distribution of Amazonian conservation research and compared it to areas under threat from deforestation or with a high probability of climate change induced savannization/transition to seasonal forest. Specifically, we created a database of 4019 spatial coordinates of research sites collated from 857 conservation science research articles retrieved from Scopus. Research sites tend to cluster along major rivers and urban areas and new research sites tend to be located near existing sites. Information deficits are particularly acute in the south and southeast regions within the so called ‘arc of deforestation’. Areas at risk of ecosystem transition due to climate instability are generally well studied with the exception of a large area of southwest Amazonia that has a high risk of savannization. Our results suggest that a more systematic approach to Amazonian conservation research is required, specifically targeting those areas most under threat from anthropogenic environmental change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams WM, Sandbrook C (2013) Conservation, evidence and policy. Oryx 47:329–335
Bush MB, Lovejoy TE (2007) Amazonian conservation: pushing the limits of biogeographical knowledge. J Biogeogr 34:1291–1293
Chomitz KM, Thomas TS (2003) Determinants of land use in Amazonia: a fine-scale spatial analysis. Am J Agric Econ 85:1016–1028
Coe MT et al (2013) Deforestation and climate feedbacks threaten the ecological integrity of south–southeastern Amazonia. Philos Trans R Soc B 368:20120155
Cook CN, Inayatullah S, Burgman MA, Sutherland WJ, Wintle BA (2014) Strategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making. Trends Ecol Evol 29:531–541. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.005
Costa MH, Pires GF (2010) Effects of Amazon and Central Brazil deforestation scenarios on the duration of the dry season in the arc of deforestation. Int J Climatol 30:1970–1979
Fearnside PM (2012) The theoretical battlefield: accounting for the carbon benefits of maintaining Brazil’s Amazon forest. Carbon Manag 3:145–158
Ficetola GF, Cagnetta M, Padoa-Schioppa E, Quas A, Razzetti E, Sindaco R, Bonardi A (2014) Sampling bias inverts ecogeographical relationships in island reptiles. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1303–1313. doi:10.1111/geb.12201
Fisher R, Radford BT, Knowlton N, Brainard RE, Michaelis FB, Caley MJ (2011) Global mismatch between research effort and conservation needs of tropical coral reefs. Conserv Lett 4:64–72
Foley JA et al (2007) Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Front Ecol Environ 5:25–32
Gillson L, Ladle RJ, Araújo MB (2011) Baselines, patterns and process. In: Ladle RJ, Whittaker RJ (eds) Conservation biogeography. Wiley, Oxford, pp 31–44
Hopkins MJ (2007) Modelling the known and unknown plant biodiversity of the Amazon Basin. J Biogeogr 34:1400–1411
Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ (2015) Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 46. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400
Ladle R, Hortal J (2013) Mapping species distributions: living with uncertainty. Front Biogeogr 5:8–9
Ladle RJ, Malhado AC (2007) Responding to biodiversity loss. In: Douglas I, Hugget R, Perkins C (eds) Companion encyclopedia of geography, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 821–834
Ladle RJ, Malhado ACM (2013) Biodiversity and extinction. In: Climent J (ed) Encyclopedia of global social issues, vol 1. M.E. Sharpe, New York, pp 61–68
Laurance WF (2013) Does research help to safeguard protected areas? Trends Ecol Evol 28:261–266
Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2011) Losing the culture of ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 92:245–246. doi:10.1890/0012-9623-92.3.245
Little PE (2005) Indigenous peoples and sustainable development subprojects in Brazilian Amazonia: the challenges of interculturality. Law Policy 27:450–471
Magnusson W, Braga-Neto R, Pezzini F, Baccaro F, Bergallo H, Penha J, Rodrigues D, Verdade LM, Lima A, Albernaz AL (2014) Biodiversity and integrated environmental monitoring. Áttema Editorial, Sao Paulo
Malhado A, Ladle R, Whittaker R, Neto A, Malhi Y, ter Steege H (2013) The ecological biogeography of Amazonia. Front Biogeogr 5:103–112
Malhado A et al (2014) Geographic and temporal trends in Amazonian knowledge production. Biotropica 46:6–13
Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319:169–172
Martin LJ, Blossey B, Ellis E (2012) Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Front Ecol Environ 10:195–201
Maslow JE (1996) Footsteps in the jungle: adventures in the scientific exploration of the American tropics. Ivan R. Dee, Chicago
Meine C, Soule M, Noss RF (2006) “A mission-driven discipline”: the growth of conservation biology. Conserv Biol 20:631–651
Milliken W, Zappi D, Sasaki D, Hopkins M, Pennington RT (2010) Amazon vegetation: how much don’t we know and how much does it matter? Kew Bull 65:691–709
Nelson BW, Ferreira CA, da Silva MF, Kawasaki ML (1990) Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature 345:714–716
Nepstad D et al (2014) Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344:1118–1123
Pautasso M (2012) Publication growth in biological sub-fields: patterns, predictability and sustainability. Sustainability 4:3234–3247
Pereira SNC (2010) Payment for environmental services in the Amazon forest: how can conservation and development be reconciled? J Environ Dev 19:171–190
Pires GF, Costa MH (2013) Deforestation causes different subregional effects on the Amazon bioclimatic equilibrium. Geophys Res Lett 40:3618–3623
Saatchi S, Houghton R, Dos Santos Alvala R, Soares J, Yu Y (2007) Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin. Glob Change Biol 13:816–837
Schulman L, Toivonen T, Ruokolainen K (2007) Analysing botanical collecting effort in Amazonia and correcting for it in species range estimation. J Biogeogr 34:1388–1399
Soulé ME (1986) Conservation biology and the “real world”. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 1–12
Sutherland WJ, Mitchell R, Prior SV (2012) The role of ‘Conservation Evidence’ in improving conservation management. Conserv Evid 9:1–2
Uniyal S (2014) Who will collect and name them? Biodivers Conserv 23:511–512. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0601-6
Wearn OR, Reuman DC, Ewers RM (2012) Extinction debt and windows of conservation opportunity in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 337:228–232
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Betty and Gordon Moore Foundation (FUNARBE/GBMF/UFV/GRANT AGREEMENT 3501) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq (#448688/2014-0). We thank Amesson Costa for help with mapping, Atanásio Neto and Carol Vilas for data processing and Gabrielle Pires for providing shape files. We also thank Dr Juliana Stropp, Dr Ruberto Fragoso Jr and Dr Mercedes Bustamante for commenting on previous version of the manuscript. RJL is supported by CNPq (#310953/2014-6). RAC is funded by CNPq (#163055/2014-9).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by David Westcott.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
dos Santos, J.G., Malhado, A.C.M., Ladle, R.J. et al. Geographic trends and information deficits in Amazonian conservation research. Biodivers Conserv 24, 2853–2863 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0981-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0981-x