Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic diversity of six arable plants in relation to their Red List status

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Central Germany and throughout Europe, arable plants count among some of the most endangered plant species. Over the last few decades, the number and size of populations have been in sharp decline due to modern land use techniques, including the application of fertilizers, herbicide use and seed cleaning procedures. As arable plant species are underrepresented in population genetic studies, it is unknown whether agricultural intensification has affected the extant populations, and whether genetic structure varies among species with differing vulnerability in respect of their Red List status. We sampled 53 populations from 6 arable plant species throughout Central Germany. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses (RAPD) were applied to calculate measures of genetic diversity at the population level and genetic differentiation. Genetic diversity was found to be lowest in Bupleurum rotundifolium and Anagallis foemina, and highest in Consolida regalis and Nigella arvensis. The highest levels of genetic differentiation were observed among populations of An. foemina and B. rotundifolium but within populations in all other species. ΦST values differed strongly ranging between 0.116 for C. regalis and 0.679 for An. foemina. Patterns of genetic structure were related to the Red List status for all the species studied except An. foemina, for which it should consequently be raised. Our data confirm that even relatively recent threats are accompanied by detrimental genetic structure. As losses of populations and increased fragmentation have occurred in all common and uncommon species, the situation for arable plants could change for the worse in the following decades, highlighting the need for consistent monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW (2000) Why are most selfers annuals? A new hypothesis for the fitness benefit of selfing. Oikos 89:606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akerreta S, Cavero RY, López V, Calvo MI (2007) Analyzing factors that influence the folk use and phytonomy of 18 medicinal plants in Navarra. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 3:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeloni F, Ouborg NJ, Leimu R (2011) Meta-analysis on the association of population size and life history with inbreeding depression in plants. Biol Conserv 144:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baessler C, Klotz S (2006) Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agr Ecosyst Environ 115:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baessler C, Klotz S, Durka W (2010) Temporal changes and spatial determinants of plant species diversity and genetic variation. Long Term Ecol Res 5:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso J, Navarrete L, Sánchez del Arco MJ, Fernandez‐Quintanilla C, Lutman PJW, Perry NH, Hull RI (2006) Dispersal of Avena fatua and Avena sterilis patches by natural dissemination, soil tillage and combine harvesters. Weed Res 46:118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittkau C, Comes HP (2005) Evolutionary processes in a continental island system: molecular phylogeography of the Aegean Nigella arvensis alliance (Ranunculaceae) inferred from chloroplast DNA. Mol Ecol 14:4065–4083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund M, Bergek S, Ranta E, Kaitala V (2010) The effect of local population dynamics on patterns of isolation by distance. Ecol Inform 5:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnin I, Huguet T, Gherardi M, Prosperi JM, Olivieri I (1996) High level of polymorphism and spatial structure in a selfing plant species, Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae), shown using RAPD markers. Am J Bot 83:843–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Naturschutz (2011) FloraWeb: Daten und Informationen zu Wildpflanzen und zur Vegetation Deutschlands. http://www.floraweb.de. Accessed15 Jan 2011

  • Charlesworth D (2003) Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1051–1070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole CT (2003) Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comes HP, Abbott RJ (2000) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and quantitative trait analyses across a major phylogeographical break in the Mediterranean ragwort Senecio gallicus Vill (Asteraceae). Mol Ecol 9:61–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dallimer M, Tinch D, Acs S, Hanley N, Southall HR, Gaston KJ, Armsworth PR (2009) 100 years of change: examining agricultural trends, habitat change and stakeholder perceptions through the 20th century. J Appl Ecol 46:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Délye C, Clément JAJ, Pernin F, Chauvel B, Le Corre V (2010) High gene flow promotes the genetic homogeneity of arable weed populations at the landscape level. Basic Appl Ecol 11:504–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter T, Walther-Hellwig K, Conradi M, Suter M, Frankl R (2006) Effects of landscape elements on the distribution of the rare bumblebee species Bombus muscorum in an agricultural landscape. Biodivers Conserv 15:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld K, Hensen I, Wesche K, Jakob SS, Tischew S, Blattner FR (2008) Molecular data indicate multiple independent colonizations of former lignite mining areas in Eastern Germany by Epipactis palustris (Orchidaceae). Biodivers Conserv 17:2441–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol 21:1003–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson ME, Newbury HJ, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Robertson LD (1998) Population genetic structure in Lens taxa revealed by isozyme and RAPD analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank D, Herdam H, Jage H, Klotz S, Ratey F, Wegener U, Weinert E, Westhus W (1992) Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt. Ber Landesamt Umweltschutz Sachsen-Anhalt 1:44–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried G, Norton L, Reboud X (2008) Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agr Ecosyst Environ 128:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried G, Petit S, Dessaint F, Reboud X (2009) Arable weed decline in Northern France: crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biol Conserv 142:238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, Morales MB, Ceryngier P, Liira J, Tscharntke T, Winqvist C, Eggers S, Bommarco R, Pärt T, Bretagnolle V, Plantegenest M, Clement LW, Dennis C, Palmer C, Oñate JJ, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Aavik T, Thies C, Flohre A, Hänke S, Fischer C, Goedhart PW, Inchausti P (2010) Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol 11:97–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs PE, Talavera S (2001) Breeding system studies with three species of Anagallis (Primulaceae): self-incompatibility and reduced female fertility in A. monelli L. Ann Bot Lond 88:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PS (2000) Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Am J Bot 87:783–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 351:1291–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans J (2010) Genetic structure of arable weed species, Adonis aestivalis and Consolida regalis, in relation to landscape structure. Dissertation, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg

  • Hawes C, Squire GR, Hallett PD, Watson CA, Young M (2010) Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx F, Maelfait JP, van Wingerden W, Schweiger O, Speelmans M, Aviron S, Augenstein I, Billeter R, Bailey D, Bukacek R, Burel F, Diekötter TIM, Dirksen J, Herzog F, Liira J, Roubalova M, Vandomme V, Bugter ROB (2007) How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensen I, Wesche K (2006) Relationships between population size, genetic diversity and fitness components in the rare plant Dictamnus albus in Central Germany. Biodivers Conserv 15:2249–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbig W (2007) Die Haftdolden-Gesellschaft der Kalkäcker in Thüringen—Erinnerungen an einstige Blütenpracht. Landschaftspfl u Natursch in Thüringen 44:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JP, Lord EM, Shaw RG (1992) Morphological and growth rate differences among outcrossing and self-pollinating races of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 5:559–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulina N (2005) List of threatened weeds in the continental part of Croatia and their possible conservation. Agric Conspec Sci 70:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2010) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2010

  • Jenkins DG, Carey M, Czerniewska J, Fletcher J, Hether T, Jones A, Knight S, Knox J, Long T, Mannino M, McGuire M, Riffle A, Segelsky S, Shappell L, Sterner A, Strickler T, Tursi R (2010) A meta-analysis of isolation by distance: relic or reference standard for landscape genetics? Ecography 33:315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Kästner A, Jäger EJ, Schubert R (2001) Handbuch der Segetalpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Springer, Wien

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir N, Portnoy V, Tzuri G, Joel DM, Castejón-Muñoz M (1996) Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in the study of the parasitic weed Orobanche. Theor Appl Genet 93:367–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Kohler F, Baldi A, Batary P, Concepcion ED, Clough Y, Diaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovacs A, Marshall EJP, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc R Soc B 276:903–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korneck D, Schnittler M, Vollmer I (1996) Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta) Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe Vegetationsk 28:21–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimu R, Mutikainen PIA, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu R, Vergeer P, Angeloni F, Ouborg NJ (2010) Habitat fragmentation, climate change and inbreeding in plants. Ann NY Acad Sci 1195:84–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lososová Z, Chytrý M, Kühn I, Hájek O, Horáková V, Pyšek P, Tichý L (2006) Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe. Perspect Plant Ecol 8:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lososová Z, Chytrý M, Kühn I (2008) Plant attributes determining the regional abundance of weeds on central European arable land. J Biogeogr 35:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:65–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig G, Haupt H, Gruttke H, Binot-Hafke M (2005) Methodische Weiterentwicklung der Roten Listen gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze in Deutschland—Eine Übersicht. Natur Landsch 80:257–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Mable BK, Adam A (2007) Patterns of genetic diversity in outcrossing and selfing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol Ecol 16:3565–3580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden-Jones EM, Weiss PE (1938) The essential differences between Anagallis arvensis Linn and Anagallis foemina Mill. Proc Linn Soc Lon 150:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP, Brain P (1999) The horizontal movement of seeds in arable soil by different soil cultivation methods. J Appl Ecol 36:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies D, Bräuer I, Maibom W, Tscharntke T (2004) Population size and the risk of local extinction: empirical evidence from rare plants. Oikos 105:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) PC-ORD 5.0. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach

  • Mengistu LW, Mueller-Warrant GW, Barker RE (2000) Genetic diversity of Poa annua in western Oregon grass seed crops. Theor Appl Genet 101:70–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer S, Leuschner C, van Elsen T (2008) Sanctuaries for the segetal vegetation in Germany—inventory and new impulses by the project “Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes”. J Plant Dis Protect Special Issue 21:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer S, Krause B, Wesche K, Leuschner C (2010) Changes in Central German arable plant communities over the last 50 years: a semi-quantitative study. In: Proceedings of 15th EWRS symposium (Kapsvoár, Hungary), pp 135–136

  • Müller-Schärer H, Fischer M (2001) Genetic structure of the annual weed Senecio vulgaris in relation to habitat type and population size. Mol Ecol 10:17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunney L (2002) The effective size of annual plant populations: the interaction of a seed bank with fluctuating population size in maintaining genetic variation. Am Nat 160:195–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nybom H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol 13:1143–1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nybom H, Bartish I (2000) Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 3:93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer JGB, Luijten SH, den Nijs JCM (2003) Integrating demographic and genetic approaches in plant conservation. Biol Conserv 113:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauw A (2007) Collapse of a pollination web in small conservation areas. Ecology 88:1759–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall ROD, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts GR, Ewald JA, Aebischer NJ (2010a) Long-term changes in the flora of the cereal ecosystem on the Sussex Downs, England, focusing on the years 1968–2005. J Appl Ecol 47:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010b) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roback PJ, Askins RA (2005) Judicious use of multiple hypothesis tests. Conserv Biol 19:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaler WB, Jäger E, Werner K (2002) Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Bd. 4 Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band. Spektrum, Heidelberg

  • Routley MB, Mavraganis K, Eckert CG (1999) Effect of population size on the mating system in a self-compatible, autogamous plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Heredity 82:518–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebold S, Hensen I, Wesche K, Röser M (2009) Extensive clonality of the endemic Calamagrostis pseudopurpurea Gerstl. ex OR Heine in central Germany revealed by RAPD markers. Plant Biol 11:473–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt T, Arens P, Smulders MJM, Billeter R, Liira J, Augenstein I, Durka W (2009) Effects of landscape structure on genetic diversity of Geum urbanum L. populations in agricultural landscapes. Flora 204:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Brown AH (1991) Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:4494–4497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15261–15264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storkey J, Meyer S, Still KS, Leuschner C (2011) The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora. Proc R Soc Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1686

  • Sudupak M, Akkaya M, Kence A (2002) Analysis of genetic relationships among perennial and annual Cicer species growing in Turkey using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 105:1220–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe OL, Kay QON (2000) Changes in the arable flora of central southern England since the 1960s. Biol Conserv 93:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson R, Wigren M (1986) History and biology of Consolida regalis in Sweden. Sven Bot Tidskr 80:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) Canoco 4.5 reference manual and CanoDraw for windows user’s guide. Biometris, Wageningen, České Budejovicĕ

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Johnson SD (2007) Reproductive assurance through self‐fertilization does not vary with population size in the alien invasive plant Datura stramonium. Oikos 116:1400–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira EA, Castro CM, de Oliveira AC, de Carvalho FIF, Dejalma Zimmer PD, Martins LF (2004) Genetic structure of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) populations estimated by RAPD. Sci Agric 61:407–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker KJ, Preston CD, Boon CR (2009) Fifty years of change in an area of intensive agriculture: plant trait responses to habitat modification and conservation, Bedfordshire, England. Biodivers Conserv 18:3597–3613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U (2008) Monitoring of landscape change and functions in Saxony (Eastern Germany)—methods and indicators. Ecol Indic 8:807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegrzynek B, Nowak T (2010) Rare and endangered segetal weed species in the Silesian Upland (s Poland) recorded in the last twenty years. Plant Breed Seed Sci 61:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welk E (2002) Arealkundliche Analyse und Bewertung der Schutzrelevanz seltener Gefäßpflanzen Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe Vegetationsk 37:1–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhus W, Zündorf HJ (1993) Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta) Thüringens. Naturschutzreport 5:134–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC (2000) Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54:1855–1861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Fischer M (2005) A threefold genetic allee effect: population size affects cross-compatibility, inbreeding depression and drift load in the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Genetics 169:2255–2265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, Johnson R, Laczko E, McCracken D, Matouch S, Niemela J, Richards C (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodivers Conserv 14:1641–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jürgen Pusch for introducing us into some parts of the study area, Frank Gottwald for collecting Nigella arvensis material from Brandenburg, and Astrid Bütof for compiling Fig. 1. Birgit Müller provided technical support and the comments of two anonymous referees helped to improve the manuscript. This study is supported by the Graduiertenförderung of Saxony-Anhalt. Daniel McCluskey kindly checked our English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Brütting.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brütting, C., Wesche, K., Meyer, S. et al. Genetic diversity of six arable plants in relation to their Red List status. Biodivers Conserv 21, 745–761 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0212-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0212-z

Keywords

Navigation