Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fox-hunting in England and Wales: its contribution to the management of woodland and other habitats

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hunting foxes with hounds has been a countryside pursuit in Britain since the 17th Century, but its effect nationally on habitat management is little understood by the general public. A survey questionnaire was distributed to 163 mounted fox hunts of England and Wales to quantify their management practices in woodland and other habitat. Ninety-two hunts (56%), covering 75,514 km2, returned details on woodland management motivated by the improvement of their sport. The management details were verified via on-site visits for a sample of 200 woodlands. Following verification, the area of woodlands containing the management was conservatively estimated at 24,053 (±2241) ha, comprising 5.9% of woodland area within the whole of the area hunted by the 92 hunts. Management techniques included: tree planting, coppicing, felling, ride and perimeter management. A case study in five hunt countries in southern England examined, through the use of botanical survey and butterfly counts, the consequences of the hunt management on woodland ground flora and butterflies. Managed areas had, within the last 5 years, been coppiced and rides had been cleared. Vegetation cover in managed and unmanaged sites averaged 86% and 64%, respectively, and managed areas held on average 4 more plant species and a higher plant diversity than unmanaged areas (Shannon index of diversity: 2.25 vs. 1.95). Both the average number of butterfly species (2.2 vs. 0.3) and individuals counted (4.6 vs. 0.3) were higher in the managed than unmanaged sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebischer N.J., Robertson P.A. and Kenward R.E. (1993a). Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aebischer N.J., Marcstrom V., Kenward R.E. and Karlbom M. (1993b). Survival and habitat utilisation: a case for compositional analysis. In: Lebreton, J.-D. and North, P.M. (eds) Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Population, pp 343–353. Birkhauser Verlag, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1994. Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan. HMSO, London.

  • Anon. 1995. Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group ReportVol. 1: Meeting the Rio Challenge. HMSO, London.

  • Asher J., Warren M., Fox R., Harding P., Jeffcoate G. and Jeffcoate S. (2001). The Millenium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman K.O. (2001). Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 1303–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce R.G.H., Smart S.M., Watkins J.W. and Scott W.A. (1999). Measuring Change in British Vegetation. Ecofact, Vol. 2. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merlewood Research Station, Cumbria

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield J. (1997). Carabid community succession during the forestry cycle in conifer plantations. Ecography 20(6): 614–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobham Resource Consultants 1997. Countryside Sports. Their Economic, Social and Conservation Significance. The Standing Conference on Countryside Sports, The College of Estate Management, Whiteknights, Reading.

  • Department for EnvironmentFood and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) 2003. Farm Woodland Premium Scheme: Rules and Procedures.

  • Department of the EnvironmentTransport and the Regions & Natural Environment Research Council (DETR) 1999. MAVIS Plot Analyser, version 1.0.

  • Emmet A.M. and Heath J. (1990). The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, 7, part 1, Hesperiidae–Nymphalidaethe Butterflies. Harley Books, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford E.D. and Newbould P.J. (1977). The biomass and production of ground vegetation and its relation to tree cover through a deciduous woodland cycle. J. Ecol. 65: 201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission. (1998). UK Forestry Standard: The Government Approach to Sustainable Forestry. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission 2002. A Guide to Managing Deadwood in Forestry Commission Forests – Life in the Deadwood. Forest Enterprise Environment and Communications, Edinburgh.

  • Fuller R.J. and Peterken G.F. (1995). Woodland and Scrub. In: Sutherland, W.J. and Hill, D.A. (eds) Managing Habitats for Conservation, pp 327–361. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R.J. and Warren M.S. (1991). Coppiced Woodlands: Their Management for Wildlife. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R.J. and Warren M.S. (1995). Management for biodiversity in British Woodlands – striking a balance. British Wildlife 7: 26–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R.M., Smith G.M., Sanderson J.M., Hill R.A., Thomson A.G., Cox R., Brown N.J., Clarke R.T., Rothery P. and Gerard F.F. 2002. Land Cover Map 2000. Countryside Survey 2000 Module 7 Final Report. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Huntingdon, UK.

  • Greatorex-Davies J.N., Hall M.L. and Marrs R.H. (1992). The conservation of the pearl-bordered fritillary (Boloria euphrosyne L.): preliminary studies on the creation and management of glades in conifer plantations. Forest Ecol. Manag. 53: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greatorex-Davies J.N., Sparks T.H. and Hall M.L. (1994). The response of heteroptera and coleoptera species to shade and aspect in rides of coniferised lowland woods in southern England. Biol. Conserv. 67(3): 255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. and Hunt R. (1988). Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species. Unwin Hyman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R.H., Barr C.J., Black H.I.J., Briggs D.J., Bunce R.G.H., Clarke R.T., Cooper A., Dawson F.H., Firbank L.G., Fuller R.M., Furse M.T., Gillespie M.K., Hill R., Hornung M., Howard D.C., McCann T., Morecroft M.D., Petit S., Sier A.R.J., Smart S.M., Smith G.M., Stott A.P., Stuart R.C. and Watkins J.W. (2000). Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside. DETR, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris E. and Harris J. (1991). Wildlife Conservation in Managed Woodland and Forests. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydon M.J. and Reynolds J.C. (2000). Fox (Vulpes vulpes) management in three contrasting regions of Britain, in relation to agricultural and sporting interests. J. Zool. 251: 237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson D. 2000. Hunting with Dogs: Conservation and Environment. Submission to the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales.

  • Hodge S.J. and Peterken G.F. (1998). Deadwood in British forests: priorities and a strategy. Forestry 71: 99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard N.S. and Carroll J.P. (2001). Driven game shooting on farms in Essex; UK implications of land management and conservation. Game Wildlife Sci. 18(2): 157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K.J. (1988). Changes in the ground flora under plantations on ancient woodland sites. Forestry 61(4): 317–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K.J. (1990). Changes in the ground flora of a broadleaved wood within a clear fell, group fells and a coppiced block. Forestry 63(3): 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K.J., Reid D.M., Thomas R.C. and Goldsmith F.B. (1998). Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. (1989). Ecological Methodology. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawesson J.E., Grashof C., Firbank L., Honnay O., Hermy M., Hobitz P. and Jensen L.M. (1998). Species diversity and area-relationships in Danish beech forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 106: 235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucherini M., Lovari S. and Crema G. (1995). Habitat use and ranging behaviour of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in a Mediterranean rural area: is shelter availability a key factor?. J. Zool. 237: 557–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludolf I.C., Robertson P.A. and Woodburn M.I.A. (1989). Changes in the ground flora and butterfly populations of woodlands managed to encourage pheasants. In: Buckley, GP (eds) Biological Habitat Reconstruction, pp 312–327. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald D.W. and Johnson P.J. (2000). Farmers and the custody of the countryside: trends in loss and conservation of non-productive habitats 1981–1998. Biol. Conserv. 94: 221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay H.V. (1991). Egg-laying requirements of woodland butterflies – brimstones (Gonepteryx rhamni) and alder buckthorn (Frangula alnus). J. Appl. Ecol. 28(2): 731–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore M.R. and Vankat J.L. (1986). Responses of the herb layer to the gap dynamics of a mature beech-maple forest. Am. Midl. Nat. 115: 336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountford E.P. and Peterken G.F. (2003). Long-term change and implications for the management of wood-pastures: experience over 40 years from Denny wood, New Forest. Forestry 76: 19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield T.E.E., Smith R.J., Harrop S.R. and Leader-Williams N. (2003). Field sports and conservation in the United Kingdom. Nature 423: 531–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G.F. (1999). Applying natural forestry concepts in an intensively managed landscape. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 8: 321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G.F. and Game M. (1984). Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J. Ecol. 72(1): 155–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E. (1977). A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 12: 115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E. and Yates T.J. (1993). Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation: The British Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston C.D., Pearman D.A. and Dines T.D. (2002). New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora: An Atlas of the Vascular Plants of Britain, Irelandthe Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. University Press, Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O. (1980). Ancient Woodland. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O. (1986). The History of the Countryside. J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds J.C. (2000). Fox Control in the Countryside. The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter D. (1999). MapInfo for Windows, Version 5.5. MapInfo Corporation, Troy, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson P.A., Woodburn M.I.A. and Hill D.A. (1988). The effects of woodland management for pheasants on the abundance of butterflies in Dorset, England. Biol. Conserv. 45: 159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell J.S. (1991). NVC British Plant Communities Volume 1: Woodland and Scrub. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson T. (2003). The outlook for forestry in the United Kingdom. J. Roy. Agr. Soc. Engl. 164: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders G., White P.C.L. and Harris S. (1997). Habitat utilisation by urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and the implications for rabies control. Mammalia 61: 497–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Short C. (1994). Implications of Game Management for Woodland Management, Landscape Conservation and Public Recreation. Centre for Rural Studies, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks T.H., Porter K., Greatorex-Davies J.N., Hall M.L. and Marrs R.H. (1994). The choice of oviposition sites in woodland by the Duke of Burgundy butterfly Hamaeris lucina in England. Biol. Conserv. 70: 257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer J.W. and Kirby K.J. (1992). An inventory of ancient woodland for England and Wales. Biol. Conserv. 62: 77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stace C. (1991). New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper S. (1999). A Question of Balance. The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak C.J.F. and Smilauer P. (2002). Canoco for Windows Version 4.5. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren M.S. (1993). A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain. 1. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites. Biol. Conserv. 64: 25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren M.S. (1995). Managing local microclimates for the high brown fritillary, Argynnis adippe. In: Pullin, A.S. (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies, pp 198–210. Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L. (1998). Systat 9.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth T., Bürgi M., Scheidegger C. and Schütz M. (2002). Dominance reduction of species through disturbance – a proposed management principle for central European forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 166: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodland Trust 2002. Space for Nature: Landscape-scale Action for Woodland Biodiversity.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Ewald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ewald, J.A., Callegari, S.E., Kingdon, N.G. et al. Fox-hunting in England and Wales: its contribution to the management of woodland and other habitats. Biodivers Conserv 15, 4309–4334 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3739-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3739-z

Key words

Navigation