Abstract
We identify a total of 96 freshwater non-indigenous species established in the River Thames catchment, England; of which 55 % were introduced intentionally. Our analysis shows that 53 % of the species became established in the last 50 years and invasion rates have significantly increased since 1800. Analysis of shipping activity and population size in the catchment area revealed a positive correlation with non-indigenous species discovery, suggesting that globalisation has facilitated many species invasions. Our calculated modern (post 1961) invasion rates reveal that one non-indigenous species is discovered every 50 weeks, despite legislation aiming to prevent introductions, making the Thames catchment among the most highly invaded freshwater systems in the world. Although sympatric invaders are expected to interact and alter one another’s impact, most studies focus on individual conspicuous invaders. Our results indicate that it is essential to comprehend multiple invasions in future work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allendorf FW, Lundquist LL (2003) Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv Biol 17:24–30
Briski E, Bailey SA, Cristescu ME et al (2010) Efficacy of ‘saltwater flushing’ in protecting the Great Lakes from biological invasions by invertebrate eggs in ships’ ballast sediment. Freshw Biol 55:2414–2424
Clark PF, Rainbow PS, Robbins RS et al (1998) The alien Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura), in the Thames catchment. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78:1215–1221
Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–558
Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO et al (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182
Francis RA, Hoggart SPG, Gurnell AM et al (2008) Meeting the challenges of urban river habitat restoration: developing a methodology for the River Thames through central London. Area 40:435–445
García-Berthou E, Alcaraz C, Pou-Rovira Q et al (2005) Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:453–463
Griffen BD, Guy T, Buck JC (2008) Inhibition between invasives: a newly introduced predator moderates the impacts of a previously established invasive predator. J Anim Ecol 77:32–40
Grosholz ED (2005) Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 102:1088–1091
Hill M, Baker R, Broad G et al. (2005) Audit of non-native species in England. English Nature report 662
Johnson P, Olden J, Solomon C et al (2009) Interactions among invaders: community and ecosystem effects of multiple invasive species in an experimental aquatic system. Oecologia 159:161–170
Kaluza P, Koelzsch A, Gastner MT et al (2010) The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J R Soc Interface 7:1093–1103
Keller RP, Zu Ermgassen PSE, Aldridge DC (2009) Vectors and timing of freshwater invasions in Great Britain. Conserv Biol 23:1526–1534
Leppäkoski E, Olenin S (2000) Non-native species and rates of spread: lessons from the brackish Baltic Sea. Biol Invasions 2:151–163
Mack RN, Lonsdale WM (2001) Humans as global plant dispersers: getting more than we bargained for. Bioscience 51:95–102
Marvier M, Kareiva P, Neubert MG (2004) Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Anal 24:869–878
Mills EL, Strayer DL, Scheuerell MD et al (1996) Exotic species in the Hudson River Basin: a history of invasions and introductions. Estuaries Coasts 19:814–823
Rahel FJ, Olden JD (2008) Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:521–533
Ricciardi A (2006) Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Divers Distrib 12:425–433
Roy H, Bacon J, Beckmann B et al. (2012) Non-native species in Great Britain: establishment, detection and reporting to inform effective decision making. Defra report July 2012
Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (2003) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington
Strayer DL, Dudgeon D (2010) Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J North Am Benthol Soc 29:344–358
Sytsma MD, Cordell JR, Chapman JW et al. (2004) Lower Columbia River aquatic nonindigenous species survey 2001–2004: final technical report. Final technical report. Prepared for the United States Coast Guard and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the UK Environment Agency for funding and Claire Frankland from the Museum of London Docklands for access to the Port of London Authority data. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, M.C., Grey, J. Accelerating rates of freshwater invasions in the catchment of the River Thames. Biol Invasions 15, 945–951 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0343-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0343-5