Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How bad are invaders in coastal waters? The case of the American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in western Europe

  • Perpectives and Paradigms
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduced species are assumed to exert a variety of negative ecological effects in their new environments. However, rigid studies on such effects are still rare. Using a case study we exemplify pitfalls and obstacles for research on ecological effects of invaders and highlight the need for a concise framework. The suspension feeding gastropod Crepidula fornicata was accidentally introduced with American oysters to Europe and was soon after defamed as an ‘oyster pest’ although no evidence was provided in justification. Recently, small-scale experiments with C. fornicata and the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas failed to prove competition. As an epizootic, however, C. fornicata is impeding native mussels Mytilus edulis but at the same time provides protection against starfish predation. It also may serve as a sink for infectious trematode parasites and hence be beneficial for bivalve basibionts. Another positive effect of C. fornicata, especially at the coast of France where it is superabundant, may be that it causes a shift of phytoplankton blooms from toxic flagellates to diatoms. The multiple interactions with recipient coastal ecosystems result in a complex interplay of negative as well as positive effects of the invader on native biota. Positive effects of invaders might occur with the same frequency as negative ones, and the general prejudice that introduced species exert per se a negative effect may dictate the outcome of research. We argue that considering both, negative as well as positive effects of an introduced species is needed to eventually enable us to evaluate the overall effect of an invasion on recipient ecosystems. Besides pointing to the importance of positive effects, this case study also shows that research on effects of introduced species should (1) be species specific, (2) consider different spatial scales, (3) clarify which stage of an invasive process is under observation and (4) clearly distinguish between ecological effects, human-relevant impacts and the ethical judgment of both. A concise framework for research on ecological effects of introduced species – which still has to be developed – should incorporate these aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • WE Ankel (1935) ArticleTitleDie Pantoffelschnecke, ein Schädling der Auster Natur und Volk 65 173–176

    Google Scholar 

  • JJ Beukema (1992) ArticleTitleExpected changes in the Wadden Sea benthos in a warmer world: lessons from periods with mild winters Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 30 73–79 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0077-7579(92)90047-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D Birnbacher (1988) Sind wir für die Natur verantwortlich D Birnbacher (Eds) Ökologie und Ethik Reclam Ditzingen 103–139

    Google Scholar 

  • M Blanchard (1997) ArticleTitleSpread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L. 1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences Scientia marina 61 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • L Chauvaud F Jean O Ragueneau G Thozeau (2000) ArticleTitleLong-term variation of the Bay of Brest ecosystem: benthic-pelagic coupling revisited Marine Ecology Progress Series 200 35–48 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmtlCltLg%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A Cohen J Carlton (1998) ArticleTitleAccelerated invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary Science 279 555–558 Occurrence Handle9438847 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXotVOksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.279.5350.555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • F Courchamp J-L Chapuis M Pascal (2003) ArticleTitleMammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact Biological Review 78 347–383 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1464793102006061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Cowie (2001) ArticleTitleInvertebrate invasions on Pacific Islands and the replacement of unique native faunas: a synthesis of the land and freshwater snails Biological Invasions 3 119–136 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014529019000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GW Cox (2004) Alien Species and Evolution Island Press Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • A Ehrhold M Blanchard J-P Auffret T Garlan (1998) ArticleTitleConséquences de la prolifération de la crépidule (Crepidula fornicata) sur l’évolution sédimentaire de la baie du Mont-Saint-Michel (Manche, France) Comptes Royale Academie Scientific Paris, Sciences de la Terre et de Planètes/Earth & Planetary Sciences 327 583–588

    Google Scholar 

  • U Eisel (2004) ArticleTitleNaturbilder sind keine Bilder aus der Natur Gaia 13 92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • MT Gomoin B Alexandrov N Shardinn Y Zaitsev (2002) The Black Sea – a recipient, donor and transit area for alien species E Leppäkoski S Gollasch S Olenin (Eds) Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Distribution, Impacts and Management Kluwer Academic Publications Dordrecht 341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • V Grimm C Wissel (1997) ArticleTitleBabel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion Oecologia 109 323–334 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420050090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E Grosholz (2002) ArticleTitleEcological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 22–27 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02358-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E Grosholz G Ruiz C Dean K Shirley J Maron P Connors (2000) ArticleTitleThe impacts of a nonindigenous marine predator in a California bay Ecology 81 1206–1224 Occurrence Handle10.2307/177202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T Heger L Trepl (2003) ArticleTitlePredicting biological invasions Biological Invasions 5 313–321 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BINV.0000005568.44154.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P Korringa (1951) ArticleTitleCrepidula fornicata as an oyster-pest Rapports et procés verbeaux des réunions. Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mers, part II 128 55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • D Lodge (1993) ArticleTitleBiological invasions: lessons for ecology Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8 133–137 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D Lodge R Stein K Brown A Covich C Brönmark J Garvey S Klosiewski (1998) ArticleTitlePredicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: challenges in spatial scaling Australian Journal of Ecology 23 53–67 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1442-9993.1998.tb00705.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O Marquard (1985) ArticleTitleÜber die Unvermeidlichkeit der Geisteswissenschaften Dokumente der Hochschulreform (Bonn) 56 47–67

    Google Scholar 

  • J Meincke D Quadfasel WH Berger K Brander RR Dickson PM Haugan M Latif J Marotzke J Marshall JF Minster J Pätzold G Parilla W Ruijter F. Schott (2003) Variability of the thermohaline circulation, THC G Wefer Lamy F Mantoura (Eds) Marine Science Frontiers for Europe Springer-Verlag Berlin 39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • KM Meyer-Abich (2000) ArticleTitleHat die Natur einen Eigenwert? Gaia 9 248–256

    Google Scholar 

  • X Montaudouin Particlede PG Sauriau (1999) ArticleTitleThe proliferating gastropod Crepidula fornicata may stimulate macrozoobenthic diversity Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK 79 1069–1077 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0025315499001319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • X Montaudouin Particlede C Audemard P-J Labourg (1999) ArticleTitleDoes the slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata, L.) impair oyster growth and zoobenthos biodiversity? A revisited hypothesis Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 135 105–124 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00167-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • X Montaudouin Particlede D Labarraque K Giraud G Bachelet (2001) ArticleTitleWhy does the introduced gastropod Crepidula fornicata fail to invade Arcachon Bay (France)? Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK 81 97–104 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0025315401003447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GE Moore (1970) Principia Ethica Reclam Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • J Olden N Poff M Douglas M Douglas K Fausch (2004) ArticleTitleEcological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 18–24 Occurrence Handle16701221 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JH Orton (1927) ArticleTitleIs the American slipper-limpet an oyster pest? Nautilus 40 102–103

    Google Scholar 

  • IM Parker D Simberloff WM Lonsdale K Goodell M Wonham PM Kareiva MH Williamson B Holle Particlevon PB Moyle JE Byers L Goldwasser (1999) ArticleTitleImpact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders Biological Invasions 1 3–19 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010034312781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JA Pechenik B Fried HL Simpkins (2001) ArticleTitleCrepidula fornicata is not a first intermediate host for trematodes: who is? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 261 211–224 Occurrence Handle11399276 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00270-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz K (2005) Parasiten zwischen den Wirten: Ökologie digener Trematoden im Wattenmeer. Diplom Thesis, University of Marburg, Germany

  • Raguenau JF, Chauvaud L, Leynaert A, Thouzeau G, Paulet Y-M, Bonnet S, Lorrain A, Grall J, Corvaiser R, Le Hir M, Jean F and Clavier J (2002) Direct evidence of a biologically active coastal silicate pump: Ecological implications. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1849–1854

    Google Scholar 

  • P Riera L Stal J Nieuwenhuize (2002) ArticleTitleδ13C versus δ13N of co-occuring molluscs within a community dominated by Crassostrea gigas and Crepidula fornicata (Oosterschelde, The Netherlands) Marine Ecology Progress Series 240 291–295

    Google Scholar 

  • GM Ruiz P Fofonoff AH Hines ED Grosholz (1999) ArticleTitleNon-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions Limnology and Oceanography 44 950–972 Occurrence Handle10.4319/lo.1999.44.3_part_2.0950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D Simberloff (2003) ArticleTitleConfronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia Biological Invasions 5 179–192 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026164419010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DW Thieltges (2005a) ArticleTitleImpact of an invader: epizootic American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata reduces survival and growth in European mussels Marine Ecology Progress Series 286 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • DW Thieltges (2005b) ArticleTitleBenefit from an invader: American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata reduces star fish predation on basibiont European mussels Hydrobiologia 541 241–244 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10750-004-4671-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DW Thieltges M Strasser K Reise (2003) ArticleTitleThe American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.) in the northern Wadden Sea 70 years after its introduction Hegoland Marine Research 57 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • DW Thieltges M Strasser J Beusekom Particlevan K Reise (2004) ArticleTitleToo cold to prosper – winter mortality prevents population increase of the introduced American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in northern Europe Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 311 375–391 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jembe.2004.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M Torchin K Lafferty A Dobson V McKenzie A Kuris (2003) ArticleTitleIntroduced species and their missing parasites Nature 421 628–630 Occurrence Handle12571595 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXovFKntA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1038/nature01346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • B Werner (1948) ArticleTitleDie amerikanische Pantoffelschnecke Crepidula fornicata L. im nordfriesischen Wattenmeer Zoologisches Jahrbuch 77 449–488

    Google Scholar 

  • M Williamson (1996) Biological Invasions Chapman & Hall London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Wadden Sea Station Sylt, Hafenstrasse 43, 25992, List, Germany

    David W. Thieltges, Matthias Strasser & Karsten Reise

Authors
  1. David W. Thieltges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Strasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karsten Reise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Thieltges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thieltges, D.W., Strasser, M. & Reise, K. How bad are invaders in coastal waters? The case of the American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in western Europe. Biol Invasions 8, 1673–1680 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5279-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5279-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation