Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variations of the specific barrier model—part I: effect of subevent size distributions

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The specific barrier model (SBM), introduced and developed by Papageorgiou and Aki (1983a; 1983b; 1985) and recently re-calibrated by Halldorsson and Papageorgiou (2005) for earthquakes of different tectonic regions, is a particular case of a composite seismic source model according to which the seismic moment is distributed in a deterministic manner on the fault plane on the basis of moment and area constraints. Namely, it assumes that a rectangular fault surface is filled with an aggregate of non-overlapping subevents modeled as circular cracks of equal diameter, the ‘barrier interval’, on which a ‘local stress drop’ takes place. In the present work, we relax the basic assumption regarding subevent size of the SBM. Subevents, still modeled as circular cracks, are allowed to vary in size according to various prescribed probability density functions controlling the frequency of occurrence of subevent sizes. Closed form expressions of the ‘far-field’ spectra of the composite source are derived using an approach proposed by Joyner and Boore (1986). The seismic energy radiated by individual subevents arrives at a site in a time window the duration of which is related to the duration of rupture and the source-site geometry. The effect of the distribution of ‘arrival times’ on the spectral amplitudes of the composite source is investigated in a companion paper, referred to as Part II. The type of subevent size distribution and its allowed size range directly affects the number of subevents required to satisfy the moment constraint. A larger number of subevents leads to increased ‘complexity’ of the earthquake which generally results in relatively higher source acceleration spectral levels at high-frequencies. The level of the plateau of the high-frequency acceleration spectral amplitudes, corresponding to different size-distributions, does not differ significantly from that of the far-field spectrum of the SBM, for a constant local stress drop. Furthermore, the differences observed in the spectral amplitudes of the SBM and its variants are likely to be less than the expected uncertainty associated with local stress drop values determined from strong-motion data. Thus, despite its simplifying assumptions, the SBM appears to provide the most simple, yet effective, description that captures the essential characteristics of a composite seismic source. This is especially advantageous for consistent strong-motion modeling in the ‘near-fault’, as well as in the ‘far-field’ region for earthquake engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrum. J Geophys Res 72(4): 1217–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K (1992) Higher-order interrelations between seismogenic structures and earthquake processes. Tectonophysics 211(1–4): 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K (2003) A perspective on the history of strong motion seismology. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 137(1–4): 5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K (2000) Scale-dependence in earthquake processes and seismogenic structures. Pure Appl Geophys 157(11): 2249–2258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K, Papageorgiou AS (1988) Separation of source and site effects in acceleration power spectra of major California earthquakes. In: Proceedings of 9th world conferece on earthquake engineering, pp 163–165

  • Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology. Theory and methods. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JG (1997) Seismic energy and stress-drop parameters for a composite source model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(1): 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (2001) Subevent structure of large earthquakes: a ground-motion perspective. Geophys Res Lett 28(1): 53–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3): 635–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75(26): 4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport WB (1970) Probability and random processes: an introduction for applied scientists and engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2003) On a new class of kinematic models: symmetrical and asymmetrical circular and elliptical cracks. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 137(1–4): 129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2002a) Seismic radiation from a unidirectional asymmetrical circular crack model, part I: constant rupture velocity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(3): 945–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2002b) Seismic radiation from a unidirectional asymmetrical circular crack model, part II: variable rupture velocity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(3): 962–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel A (1991) High-frequency spectral falloff of earthquakes, fractal dimension of complex rupture, b value, and the scaling of strength on faults. J Geophys Res 96(B4): 6291–6302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusev AA (1983) Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion. Geophys J R Astron Soc 74(3): 787–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusev AA (1989) Multiasperity fault model and the nature of short-period subsources. Pure Appl Geophys 130(4): 635–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B (2004) The specific barrier model: its calibration to earthquakes of different tectonic regions and the synthesis of strong ground motions for earthquake engineering applications. Ph.D. dissertation, Buffalo, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, NY

  • Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS (2005) Calibration of the specific barrier model to earthquakes of different tectonic regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(4): 1276–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS (2012) Variations of the specific barrier model—part II: effect of isochron distributions. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9345-z

  • Halldorsson B, Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2011) Near-fault and Far-field strong ground motion simulation for earthquake engineering applications using the specific barrier model. J Struct Eng 137(3): 433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Ólafsson S, Sigbjörnsson R (2007) A fast and efficient simulation of the far-fault and near-fault earthquake ground motions associated with the June 17 and 21, 2000, earthquakes in South Iceland. J Earthq Eng 11(3): 343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1986) On simulating large earthquakes by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes. In: Das S. (eds) Earthquake source mechanics. Maurice Ewing series. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5): 1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3): 1099–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(9): 1023–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi M et al (2007) Analysis of Iranian strong-motion data using the specific barrier model. J Geophys Eng 4(4): 415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS (1988) On two characteristic frequencies of acceleration spectra: patch corner frequency and fmax. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78(2): 509–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS (2003) The barrier model and strong ground motion. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3): 603–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983a) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(3): 693–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983b) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part II. Applications of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(4): 953–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1985) Scaling law of far-field spectra based on observed parameters of the specific barrier model. Pure Appl Geophys 123(3): 353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis A (1962) The Fourier integral and its applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz JA et al (2011) Modelling directivity of strong ground motion with a fractal, k-2, kinematic source model. Geophys J Int 186(1): 226–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Hirasawa T (1973) Body wave spectra from propagating shear cracks. J Phys Earth 21: 415–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soghrat MR, Khaji N, Zafarani H (2012) Simulation of strong ground motion in northern Iran using the specific barrier model. Geophys J Int 188(2): 645–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ, Madariaga R (1994) Scaling relations for composite earthquake models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4): 1279–1283

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafarani H et al (2008) Calibration of the specific barrier model to Iranian plateau earthquakes and development of physically based attenuation relationships for Iran. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(7): 550–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Yu G (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophys Res Lett 21(8): 725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of Iceland, Austurvegur 2A, 800, Selfoss, Iceland

    Benedikt Halldorsson

  2. Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Hjarðarhagi 2-6, 107, Reykjavík, Iceland

    Benedikt Halldorsson

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, 26500, Patras, Greece

    Apostolos S. Papageorgiou

Authors
  1. Benedikt Halldorsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Apostolos S. Papageorgiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Halldorsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halldorsson, B., Papageorgiou, A.S. Variations of the specific barrier model—part I: effect of subevent size distributions. Bull Earthquake Eng 10, 1299–1319 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9344-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9344-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation