The effects of bone graft materials on the inflammatory response and biochemical markers of bone remodeling were studied on a rabbit model of fracture augmentation with the following grafts: β-tricalcium phosphate, demineralized bone matrix, nanostructured carbon implant, and porous titanium implant made by additive 3D printing. The markers of bone remodeling and the blood system response in the postoperative period were studied. It was found that porous titanium implant and β-tricalcium phosphate induced osteogenesis and minimized osteoclastic resorption. Augmentation with nanostructured carbon implant and demineralized bone matrix stimulated the processes of osteoclastic resorption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazarnyy VV, Isaykin AI. Immunodiagnistics and immunocorreection after skeletal trauma. Vestn. Ural. Med. Akad. Nauki. 2014;(1):50-51. Russian.
Bazarnyi VV, Isaikin AI, Krokhina NB, Beresneva OYu, Vlasov AA, Shchekoldin PI. Cellular mechanisms underlying realization of the effects of physical factors on bone tissue remodeling. Vestn. Travmat. Ortoped. 2010;2(2):18-20. Russian.
Gilev MV. Surgical treatment of intraarticular tibial plateau fractures. Genii Ortopedii. 2018;24;(2):134-141. Russian.
Gilev MV. Surgical management of intra-articular impression distal radius fracture. Genii Ortopedii. 2014;(1):75-81. Russian.
Ladonin SV. Features of reparative osteogenesis in cases of experimental chronic osteomyelitis after the plastic replacement of bone cavity with demineralized bone implant. Vrach-Aspirant. 2011;45(2.4):586-592. Russian.
Gilev MV, Kutepov SM, Volokitina EA, Antoniadi YV, Koshelev VS, Borisov SA, Kazakova YE, Izmodenova MY, Lipatov SG. Patent RU No. 2669047. Modeling method of the intraarticular impression traction of proximal tibia. Bull. No. 28. Published October 5, 2018.
Polupan PV. Bone grafting and dental implantation: a look at the problem. Med. Alfavit. 2014;3(13):32-35. Russian.
Tikhilov RM, Fomin NF, Koryshkov NA, Emelyanov VG, Privalov AM. Current aspects of treatment of hindfoot fracture complications. Travmatol. Ortoped. Rossii. 2009;(52):144-149. Russian.
Daentzer D. Implant reaction: PEEK versus Titan – Which material promotes best osteogenesis? Z. Orthop. Unfall. 2015;153(3):244.
Shah A, Naranje S, Araoye I, Elattar O, Godoy-Santos AL, Cesar C. Netto. Role of bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in isolated subtalar joint arthrodesis. Acta Ortop. Bras. 2017;25(5):183-187.
Vlot MC, den Heijer M, de Jongh RT, Vervloet MG, Lems WF, de Jonge R, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Heijboer AC. Clinical utility of bone markers in various diseases. Bone. 2018;114:215-225.
Yoon BH, Yu W. Clinical Utility of Biochemical Marker of Bone Turnover: Fracture Risk Prediction and Bone Healing. J. Bone Metab. 2018;25(2):73-78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 167, No. 5, pp. 626-630, May, 2019
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilev, M.V., Bazarny, V.V., Volokitina, E.A. et al. Laboratory Monitoring of Bone Tissue Remodeling after Augmentation of Impression Intraarticular Fracture with Different Types of Bone Graft. Bull Exp Biol Med 167, 681–684 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-019-04598-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-019-04598-7