Skip to main content
Log in

Homosexual Orientation—From Nature, Not Abuse: A Critique of Roberts, Glymour, and Koenen (2013)

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roberts, Glymour, and Koenen (2013), using instrumental variable models, argued that child abuse causes homosexual orientation, defined in part as any same-sex attractions. Their instruments were various negative family environment factors. In their analyses, they found that child sexual abuse (CSA) was more strongly related to homosexual orientation than non-sexual maltreatment was, especially among males. The present commentary therefore focused on male CSA. It is argued that Roberts et al.’s “abuse model” is incorrect and an alternative is presented. Male homosexual behavior is common in primates and has been common in many human societies, such that an evolved human male homosexual potential, with individual variation, can be assumed. Cultural variation has been strongly influenced by cultural norms. In our society, homosexual expression is rare because it is counternormative. The “counternormativity model” offered here holds that negative family environment weakens normative controls and increases counternormative thinking and behavior, which, in combination with sufficient homosexual potential and relevant, reinforcing experiences, can produce a homosexual orientation. This is a benign or positive model (innate potential plus release and reinforcement), in contrast to Roberts et al.’s negative model (abuse plus emotional compensation or cognitive distortion). The abuse model is criticized for being based on the sexual victimological paradigm, which developed to describe the female experience in rape and incest. This poorly fits the gay male experience, as demonstrated in a brief non-clinical literature review. Validly understanding male homosexuality, it is argued, requires the broad perspective, as employed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Notably missing from this list is oral sex, which is quite common in the male homosexual population, including youthful members (Savin-Williams, 2006). Though some research participants may have selected “touching” or “intercourse” to represent their oral sex experience, it cannot be assumed that others did, which raises validity concerns for the CSA analyses.

  2. Notably, the national survey analyzed by Roberts et al., like most such surveys, measured homosexual rather than gay attractions and behavior. Thus, caution is needed in interpreting this national survey—it cannot be assumed that the percent of those with homosexual attractions, for example, were strictly gay. A certain, unknown proportion, for example, could have been pederasts.

  3. Unweighted means were computed owing to the outlier nature of one of the studies (i.e., Doll et al., 1992). This study, unlike the others, was quasi-clinical and asked its subjects “whether they were encouraged or forced to have sexual contact before the age of 19 with a person whom they perceived as older or more powerful than themselves” (p. 857), which is a biased question. Its “encouraged or forced” phrase suggests interactions that were mainly passive or unwanted, and its “more powerful” phrase frames the contacts in victimological terms. Compare their question, for example, with the completely neutral question in the Stanley et al. (2004) study: “As a child or adolescent, did you have any sexual contact with an adult or older person?” The other studies in the table, aside from Doll et al., also used neutral, unbiased questions. The sample size of Doll et al. was z = 2.22 above the mean sample size of the other studies, and its negative reaction percent was z = 1.89 above the mean negative reaction in the other studies, indicating the need for unweighted means as a corrective. Note also: positive, neutral, and negative percents did not add up to 100% because of rounding and uneven numbers of entries.

References

  • Arreola, S., Neilands, T., Pollack, L., Paul, J., & Catania, J. (2008). Childhood sexual experiences and adult health sequelae among gay and bisexual men: Defining childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 246–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance: Animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (1997, May/June). Victimization and victim industry. Society, 9–17.

  • Boag, P. (2003). Same-sex affairs: Constructing and controlling homosexuality in the Pacific Northwest. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briere, J. N., & Elliott, D. M. (1994). Immediate and long-term impacts of child sexual abuse. Future of Children, 4, 54–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (2007). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carballo-Diéguez, A., Balan, I., Dolezal, C., & Mello, M. B. (2012). Recalled sexual experiences in childhood with older partners: A study of Brazilian men who have sex with men and male-to-female transgender persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 363–376.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, S. (2009). The trauma myth: The truth about the sexual abuse of children—and its aftermath. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crapo, R. H. (1995). Factors in the cross-cultural patterning of male homosexuality: A reappraisal of the literature. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, L. (2003). Homosexuality and civilization. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolezal, C., & Carballo-Diéguez, A. (2002). Childhood sexual experiences and the perception of abuse among Latino men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 165–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, L. S., Joy, D., Bartholow, B. N., Harrison, J. S., Bolan, G., Douglas, J. M., et al. (1992). Self-reported childhood and adolescent sexual abuse among adult homosexual and bisexual men. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 855–864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C., & Beach, F. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R. B. (1999). Sexual victimization of boys by men: Meanings and consequences. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 3, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gat, A. (2006). War in human civilization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathorne-Hardy, J. (1978). The old school tie: The phenomenon of the English public school. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanni’s Room Press Release. (1999, March 24). Access to information about pedophilia and the outrages of child abuse.

  • Greenberg, D. (1988). The construction of homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsch, B. (1990). Passions of the cut sleeve: The male homosexual tradition in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, K., & Young, A. (1977). The gay report. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child-molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (2006). The decade of nightmares: The end of the Sixties and the making of Eighties America. London, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R. (1991). Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health, 12, 597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., Costa, F., Jessor, L., & Donovan, J. (1983). Time of first intercourse: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 608–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, R. C. (2000). The evolution of human homosexual behavior. Current Anthropology, 41, 385–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L. (1981). Reports from the Holocaust. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United Stares. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, A., & Cantarella, E. (2008). Images of ancient Greek pederasty: Boys were their gods. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leupp, G. P. (1995). Male colors: The construction of homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malón, A. (2010). Onanism and child sexual abuse: A comparative study of two hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 637–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malón, A. (2011a). The “participating victim” in the study of erotic experiences between children and adults: An historical analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 169–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malón, A. (2011b). Victimology, divergence, and disinformation in sexology: Commentary on Riegel (2011). International Journal of Sexual Health, 23, 161–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. (2006). Establishing trust: Socio-sexual behaviour and the development of male-male bonds among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. In V. Sommer & P. L. Vasey (Eds.), Homosexual behavior in animals: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 107–130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, M. K., & Herdt, G. (1996). Rethinking puberty: The development of sexual attraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 178–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. (1988). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscarella, F. (2007). The evolution of male-male sexual behavior in humans. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18, 275–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najman, J. M., Dunne, M. P., Purdie, D. M., Boyle, F. M., & Coxeter, P. D. (2005). Sexual abuse in childhood and sexual dysfunction in adulthood: An Australian population-based study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 517–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, J. (2009). The origins and role of same-sex relations in human societies. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M., & Blum, R. (1994). The association of consensual sexual intercourse during childhood with adolescent health risk and behaviors. Pediatrics, 94, 907–913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B. (2001). Gay and bisexual adolescent boys’ sexual experiences with men: An empirical examination of psychological correlates in a nonclinical sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 345–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., & Tromovitch, P. (2007). National samples, sexual abuse in childhood, and adjustment in adulthood: A commentary on Najman, Dunne, Purdie, Boyle, and Coxeter (2005). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (2001). The validity and appropriateness of methods, analyses, and conclusions in Rind et al. (1998): A rebuttal of victimological critique from Ondersma et al. (2001) and Dallam et al. (2001). Psychological Bulletin, 127, 734–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., & Welter, M. (2012). Enjoyment and emotionally negative reactions in minor-adult versus minor-peer and adult-adult first postpubescent coitus: A secondary analysis of the Kinsey data. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Rind, B., & Yuill, R. (2012). Hebephilia as mental disorder? A historical, cross-cultural, sociological, cross-species, non-clinical empirical, and evolutionary review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 797–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. L., Glymour, M. M., & Koenen, K. C. (2013). Does maltreatment in childhood affect sexual orientation in adulthood? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 161–171.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, M. (1996). Forbidden friendships: Homosexuality and male culture in Renaissance Florence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouayheb, K. (2005). Before homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500–1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C. (1997). “… and then I became gay:” Young men’s stories. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C. (2006). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, S. (2007, November-December). What ever happened to complexity? Gay & Lesbian Review, pp. 10–11.

  • Smuts, B. B., & Watanabe, J. M. (1990). Social relationships and ritualized greetings in adult male baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis). International Journal of Primatology, 11, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V., & Vasey, P. L. (Eds.). (2006). Homosexual behavior in animals: An evolutionary perspective. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spada, J. (1979). The Spada report. New York: Signet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. L., Bartholomew, K., & Oram, D. (2004). Gay and bisexual men’s age-discrepant childhood sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 381–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The National Lesbian and Gay Survey. (1993). Proust, Cole Porter, Michelangelo, Marc Almond, and me: Writings by gay men on their lives and lifestyles. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, R. (2005). When I knew. New York: HarperEntertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuller, D. (2002). Minor report: Sex between teenage boys and older men is not always coercive-and it can be more ecstatic than traumatic. Retrieved from http://www.sa-lon.com/mwt/feature/2002/07/22/coming_of_age/print.html.

  • Vasey, P. L. (1995). Homosexual behavior in primates: A review of evidence and theory. International Journal of Primatology, 16, 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N. (2008, July 15). Taking a cue from ants on evolution of humans. The New York Times.

  • Wade, H. (2011, August 2). Sign of advancing society? An organized war effort. The New York Times.

  • Werner, D. (2006). The evolution of male homosexuality and its implications for human psychological and cultural variations. In V. Sommer & P. L. Vasey (Eds.), Homosexual behavior in animals: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 316–346). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. A. (1999). Roman homosexuality: Ideologies of masculinity in classical antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Rind.

Additional information

Editor’s note

I asked Dr. Rind, one of the referees for the Roberts et al. (2013) article, to provide a commentary, to which he kindly agreed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rind, B. Homosexual Orientation—From Nature, Not Abuse: A Critique of Roberts, Glymour, and Koenen (2013). Arch Sex Behav 42, 1653–1664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0080-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0080-6

Keywords

Navigation