Skip to main content
Log in

How predatory mites find plants with whitefly prey

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We investigated the searching behaviour of two species of predatory mites, Typhlodromips swirskii (Athias-Henriot) and Euseius scutalis (Athias-Henriot), both known to feed on immature stages of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. When released in a greenhouse inside a circle of cucumber plants that were alternatingly clean or infested with immature whiteflies, the mites took several days to find plants. Both species were recaptured significantly more on plants with whiteflies. This suggests that the mites are able to discriminate between plants with and without whiteflies. The predators may either have been attracted to plants with whiteflies from a distance or arrested on plants with whiteflies.

Typhlodromips swirskii that had previously fed on whitefly immatures on cucumber leaves were significantly attracted by volatiles from cucumber plants with whiteflies in a Y-tube olfactometer. This suggests that the mites use volatile cues to discriminate between infested and clean plants. However, this response waned rapidly; if predators, experienced as above, were starved for 3–4 h in absence of cucumber leaves, they no longer preferred volatiles of infested plants to clean plants. Furthermore, T. swirskii that had no experience with immature whiteflies on cucumber plants also did not prefer odours of infested plants to those of clean plants. Because the release experiment with this species in the greenhouse was done with inexperienced predators, this suggests that the aggregation of mites on plants with whiteflies was mainly caused by differential arrestment of mites on plants with prey and clean plants. For T. swirskii, this was in agreement with the finding that the fraction of predators on plants with prey increased with time to levels higher than 70%. A less clear trend was found for E. scutalis, for which the fraction of predators on plants with prey stabilized soon after release to levels from 54–70%. Hence, the predatory mites may find plants with prey by random searching, but they are subsequently arrested on these plants.

An earlier study showed that 87% of all whiteflies released in a set-up as used here were recaptured within 1 day. Hence, the effectiveness with which predatory mites locate plants with whiteflies is low compared with that of their prey. We expect this to generate spatial patterns in the dynamics of predator and prey and this may have consequences for biological control of whiteflies with predatory mites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.A. Birkett K. Chamberlain E. Guerrieri J.A. Pickett L.J. Wadhams T. Yasuda (2003) ArticleTitleVolatiles from whitefly-infested plants elicit a host-locating response in the parasitoidEncarsia formosa J. Chem. Ecol 29 1589–1600 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024218729423 Occurrence Handle12921437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P.A. Brodmann C.V. Wilcox S. Harrison (1997) ArticleTitleMobile parasitoids may restrict the spatial spread of an insect outbreak J. Anim. Ecol 66 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Dicke (1994) ArticleTitleLocal and systemic production of volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids - Their role in plant-carnivore mutualism J. Plant Physiol 143 465–472

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Dicke M.W. Sabelis (1988) ArticleTitleHow plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards Netherlands J. Zool 38 148–165

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Dicke C. Schutte H. Dijkman (2000) ArticleTitleChange in behavioral response to herbivore-induced plant volatiles in a predatory mite population J. Chem. Ecol 26 1497–1514 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005543910683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Dicke T.A. Beek Particlevan M.A. Posthumus N. Ben Dom H. Bokhoven Particlevan AE. Groot Particlede (1990) ArticleTitleIsolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator-prey interactions - Involvement of host plant in its production J. Chem. Ecol 16 381–396 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01021772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Drukker J. Bruin G. Jacobs A. Kroon M.W. Sabelis (2000) ArticleTitleHow predatory mites learn to cope with variability in volatile plant signals in the environment of their herbivorous prey Exp. Appl. Acarol 24 881–895 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010645720829 Occurrence Handle11354616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Guerrieri (1997) ArticleTitleFlight behaviour of Encarsia formosa in response to plant and host stimuli Entomol. Exp. Appl 82 129–133 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1002905428258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K.M. Heinz M.P. Parrella (1998) ArticleTitleHost location and utilization by selected parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): Implications for augmentative biological control Environ. Entomol 27 773–784

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Honda Y. Kainoh H. Honda (1999) ArticleTitleThe persistence of a learned response in the egg-larval parasitoid Ascogaster reticulatus Watanabe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Entomol. Sci 2 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.R. Ives P. Kareiva R. Perry (1993) ArticleTitleResponse of a predator to variation in prey density at three hierarchical scales: lady beetles feeding on aphids Ecology 74 1929–1938

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Janssen (1999) ArticleTitlePlants with spider-mite prey attract more predatory mites than clean plants under greenhouse conditions Entomol. Exp. Appl 90 191–198 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003551931509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Janssen M.W. Sabelis J. Bruin (2002) ArticleTitleEvolution of herbivore-induced plant volatiles Oikos 97 134–138 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970114.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kessler I.T. Baldwin (2001) ArticleTitleDefensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature Science 291 2141–2144 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.291.5511.2141 Occurrence Handle11251117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O.E. Krips P.E.L. Willems R. Gols M.A. Posthumus M. Dicke (1999) ArticleTitleThe response of Phytoseiulus persimilis to spider mite-induced volatiles from gerbera: Influence of starvation and experience J. Chem. Ecol 25 2623–2641 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020887104771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.L. Maron S. Harrison (1997) ArticleTitleSpatial pattern formation in an insect host-parasitoid system Science 278 1619–1621

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.L. Maron S. Harrison M. Greaves (2001) ArticleTitleOrigin of an insect outbreak: escape in space or time from natural enemies? Oecologia 126 595–602 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420000558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Messelink S. Steenpaal Particlevan (2003) ArticleTitleNieuwe roofmijten tegen trips in komkommer Groenten & Fruit 43 34–35

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Nomikou A. Janssen M.W. Sabelis (2003a) ArticleTitleHerbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring Oecologia 136 484–488 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00442-003-1289-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Nomikou A. Janssen M.W. Sabelis (2003b) ArticleTitlePhytoseiid predator of whitefly feeds on plant tissue Exp. Appl. Acarol 31 27–36 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:APPA.0000005150.33813.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Nomikou A. Janssen M.W. Sabelis (2003c) ArticleTitlePhytoseiid predators of whiteflies feed and reproduce on non- prey food sources Exp. Appl. Acarol 31 15–26 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:APPA.0000005142.31959.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Nomikou A. Janssen R. Schraag M.W. Sabelis (2001) ArticleTitlePhytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci Exp. Appl. Acarol 25 271–291 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1017976725685 Occurrence Handle11603735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Nomikou A. Janssen R. Schraag M.W. Sabelis (2002) ArticleTitlePhytoseiid predators suppress populations of Bemisia tabaci on cucumber plants with alternative food Exp. Appl. Acarol 27 57–68 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021559421344 Occurrence Handle12593512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. W.P.J. Overmeer (1985) Rearing and handling W. Helle M.W. Sabelis (Eds) Spider Mites, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control NumberInSeriesVol 1b Elsevier Amsterdam 162–170

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.R. Papaj H. Snellen K. Swaans L.E.M. Vet (1994) ArticleTitleUnrewarding experiences and their effect on foraging in the parasitic wasp Leptopilina heterotoma (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae) J. Insect Behav 7 465–481 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02025444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M.W. Sabelis A. Janssen J. Bruin F.M. Bakker B. Drukker P. Scutareanu P.C.J. Rijn Particlevan (1999a) Interactions between arthropod predators and plants: A conspiracy against herbivorous arthropods? J. Bruin L.P.S. Geest Particlevan der M.W. Sabelis (Eds) Ecology and Evolution of the Acari Kluwer Academic Publishers DordrechtThe Netherlands 207–229

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.W. Sabelis A. Janssen A. Pallini M. Venzon J. Bruin B. Drukker P. Scutareanu (1999b) Behavioural responses of predatory and herbivorous arthropods to induced plant volatiles: From evolutionary ecology to agricultural applications A.A. Agrawal S. Tuzun E. Bent (Eds) Induced Plant Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores Am. Phytopath. Soc. Press St Paul, MinnesotaUSA 269–296

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.W. Sabelis H.E. Baan Particlevan de (1983) ArticleTitleLocation of distant spider mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: demonstration of specific kairomones emitted by Tetranychus urticae Panonychus ulmi Entomol. Exp. Appl 33 303–314

    Google Scholar 

  29. R.R. Sokal F.J. Rohlf (1995) Biometry EditionNumber3rd edn Freeman New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Takabayashi M. Dicke M.A. Posthumus (1994) ArticleTitleVolatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant mite interactions - Variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors J. Chem. Ecol 20 1329–1354 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02059811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T.C.J. Turlings J.H. Loughrin P.J. McCall U.S.R. Rose W.J. Lewis J.H. Tumlinson (1995) ArticleTitleHow caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92 4169–4174 Occurrence Handle7753779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. J.C. Lenteren Particlevan H.J.W. Roermund Particlevan S. Sütterlin (1996) ArticleTitleBiological control of greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) with the parasitoid Encarsia formosa: How does it work? Biol. Control 6 1–10 Occurrence Handle10.1006/bcon.1996.0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L.L. Walling (2000) ArticleTitleThe myriad plant responses to herbivores J. Plant Growth Regul 19 195–216 Occurrence Handle11038228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arne Janssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nomikou, M., Meng, R., Schraag, R. et al. How predatory mites find plants with whitefly prey. Exp Appl Acarol 36, 263–275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-6650-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-6650-0

Keywords

Navigation