Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Multiple-Site Performance-Contingent SEMG Reward Programming in Pediatric Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Review

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We completed a retrospective review of the effectiveness of multi-site, performance-contingent reward programming on functional change in motor performance of 16 treatment resistant children. Patients were previously treated in physical or occupational therapy for head control, standing balance training, sitting and upper extremity use (brachial plexus injury). They then participated in a program that utilized multiple surface electromyography sites the use of which was rewarded with videos for performing the correct constellation of recruitment pattern (e.g., contracting some muscles while relaxing others). Onset of reward was calibrated for each patient and transfer of skill to outside the clinic was encouraged by linking a verbal cue to the correct motor plan. Fourteen of the 16 patients improved. The implications of the use of this technique in the treatment of motor dysfunction is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Armagan, O., Tascioglu, F., & Oner, C. (2003). Electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of the hemiplegic hand: A placebo controlled study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82, 856–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1984). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, J. V., Kukulka, C. G., Narayan, M. G., & Takebe, K. (1975). Biofeedback treatment of foot-drop after stroke compared with standard rehabilitation technique: Effects on voluntary control and strength. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 56, 231–236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 331–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, S. A., Moll, C. B., & Wolf, S. L. (1981). Evaluation of electromyographic biofeedback as an adjunct to therapeutic exercise in treating the lower extremities of hemiplegic patients. Physical Therapy, 61, 886–893.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolek, J. E. (1998). Surface EMG applications in a pediatric rehabilitation setting. Biofeedback, 26, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolek, J. E., Mansour, L., & Sabet, A. (2001a). Enhancing proper sitting position using a new SEMG protocol, the “Minimax” procedure, with Boolean logic. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback, 26(1), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolek, J. E. (2001b). Surface electromyography in pediatric rehabilitation: A meld of science and art. Biofeedback, 29(2), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolek, J. E. (2001c). Some reflections on learning theory, surface electromyography and motor learning. Biofeedback, 31(3), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolek, J. E. (2003). A preliminary study of modification of gait in real-time using surface electromyography. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback, 28(2), 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., Hart, B., Mandana, S., Flowers, K., Riches, M, & Sanderson, P. (1998). Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colborne, G. R., Wright, F. V., & Naumann, S. N. (1994). Feedback of triceps surae EMG in gait of children with cerebral palsy: A controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75, 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, J. R., Kasman, G. S., & Holtz, J. (1998). Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J. L., Lincoln, N. B., Nouri, F. M., & DeWeerdt, W. (1989). The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. International Disability Studies, 11, 155–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, H., Jannink, J. A., & Hermens, H. J. (2005). Effect of augmented feedback on motor function of the affected upper extremity in rehabilitation patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 202–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Leiblum, S. R. (1974). How to do psychotherapy and how to evaluate it. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B., & Bailey, J. (1974). Reward versus cost token systems: An analysis of the effects on students and teachers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 567–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman, G. S., Cram, J. R., Wolf, S. L., & Barton, L. (1998). Clinical applications in surface electromyography. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F. J., & Surwit, R. S. (1978). Electromyographic feedback: Behavioral treatment of neuromuscular disorders. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1, 13–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lalli, J. S., Vollmer, T. R., Progar, P. R., Wright, C., Borrero, J., Daniel, D., Barthold, C. H., Tocco, K., & May, W. (1999). Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 285–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., Hill, E., Johnston, R., & Smiehorowski, T. (1976). Myofeedback for muscle retraining in hemiplegic patients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 57, 588–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintern, G., & Roscoe, S. N. (1980). Visual cue augmentation in contact flight simulation. In S. N. Roscoe (Ed.), Aviation psychology (pp. 143–154). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magill, R. A. (1998). Motor learning: Concepts and applications. Dubuque, Iowa: WCB Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J. D., Thomson, M. A., & Fuoco, A. R. (1998). Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 79, 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mroczek, N., Halpern, D., & McHugh, R. (1978). Electromyographic feedback and physical therapy for neuromuscular retraining in hemiplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 59, 258–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, T., Hulstijn, W., & Van Der Meer, J. (1986). EMG feedback and the restoration of motor control. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 65, 173–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, S, Ettare, D, Drew, D, & Hodge, S. (2001). Muscle learning therapy-efficacy of a biofeedback based protocol in treating work-related upper extremity disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 11, 23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrofsky, J. S. (2001). The use of electromyogram biofeedback to reduce Trendelenburg gait. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 85, 491–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (1978). The psychology of learning and behavior. New York: W.W. Norton Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. (2000). Guidelines for neuromuscular re-education: The electromyographic approach. Martins Ferry, OH: Gen Med Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. G., Travell, J. G., & Simons, L. S. (1999). Myofascial pain and dysfunction: The trigger point manual. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. J. (1991). Knowledge of results and motor learning: Implications for physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 71, 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey E. Bolek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolek, J.E. Use of Multiple-Site Performance-Contingent SEMG Reward Programming in Pediatric Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 31, 263–272 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9017-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9017-3

KEY WORDS:

Navigation