Abstract
In this paper, we propose a multi-objective reverse logistics network design model for multiple periods under uncertainty. The proposed model addresses the conflicting objectives of maximizing profit and minimizing carbon emissions in a reverse logistics network design problem. We conceptualize dynamic flexibility in capacity levels of different facilities in reverse logistics under multi-objective optimization setting. Our dynamic flexible capacity model allows the decision makers to increase or decrease the capacity levels of facilities in different periods. Augmented \(\varepsilon \)-constraint method is considered to solve the multi-objective optimization problem. Our analysis shows that the flexible capacity can improve the profit and reduce the carbon emission when compared with the fixed capacity case. Sensitivity analysis is carried out with respect to different costs and subsidies in the system to illustrate the robustness of the model. The analysis shows that the Pareto-frontiers associated with low cost and high subsidy dominate that of high cost and low subsidy, respectively. Results of the study suggest the need for providing flexible capacity levels in designing the reverse logistics network with environmental concerns for a better performance of reverse logistics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Point 6 in the Pareto frontier in Fig. 1.
In our dynamic flexible model, the highest level of capacity is set as the capacity level in the fixed capacity model. This is a logical assumption to ensure that the fixed capacity model is prepared with maximum possible capacity to operate in an uncertain demand scenario.
References
Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2015). A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 97, 76–92.
Alshamsi, A., & Diabat, A. (2015). A reverse logistics network design. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 589–598.
Alumur, S. A., Nickel, S., Saldanha-Da-Gama, F., & Verter, V. (2012). Multi-period reverse logistics network design. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1), 67–78.
autorecyclingworldcom. (2021). Renault India announces partnership with cero recycling to support the new scrappage policy. https://autorecyclingworld.com/renault-india-announces-partnership-with-cero-recycling-to-support-the-new-scrappage-policy/.
Ayvaz, B., Bolat, B., & Aydın, N. (2015). Stochastic reverse logistics network design for waste of electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 391–404.
Bazan, E., Jaber, M., & Zanoni, S. (2016). A review of mathematical inventory models for reverse logistics and the future of its modeling: An environmental perspective. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(5), 4151–4178.
Cao, J., Lu, B., Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Zhai, G., Zhou, G., Jiang, B., & Schnoor, J. L. (2016). Extended producer responsibility system in china improves e-waste recycling: Government policies, enterprise, and public awareness. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 882–894.
De Rosa, V., Gebhard, M., Hartmann, E., & Wollenweber, J. (2013). Robust sustainable bi-directional logistics network design under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 145(1), 184–198.
Demirel, E., Demirel, N., & Gökçen, H. (2016). A mixed integer linear programming model to optimize reverse logistics activities of end-of-life vehicles in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2101–2113.
Demirel, N. Ö., & Gökçen, H. (2008). A mixed integer programming model for remanufacturing in reverse logistics environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(11–12), 1197–1206.
European Union Directive (2012). European union weee directive 2012/19/eu. Retrieved May 06, 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02012L0019-20180704.
Fattahi, M., & Govindan, K. (2017). Integrated forward/reverse logistics network design under uncertainty with pricing for collection of used products. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 193–225.
Gonzalez-Torre, P. L., Adenso-Dıaz, B., & Artiba, H. (2004). Environmental and reverse logistics policies in European bottling and packaging firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 88(1), 95–104.
Govindan, K., Paam, P., & Abtahi, A. R. (2016). A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for sustainable reverse logistics network design. Ecological Indicators, 67, 753–768.
Govindan, K., & Soleimani, H. (2017). A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: A journal of cleaner production focus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 371–384.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. In: O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel & J. C. Minx (Eds.), Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
Jayaraman, V., Guide, V., Jr., & Srivastava, R. (1999). A closed-loop logistics model for remanufacturing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(5), 497–508.
Jena, S. D., Cordeau, J. F., & Gendron, B. (2016). Solving a dynamic facility location problem with partial closing and reopening. Computers & Operations Research, 67, 143–154.
Jerbia, R., Boujelben, M. K., Sehli, M. A., & Jemai, Z. (2018). A stochastic closed-loop supply chain network design problem with multiple recovery options. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 118, 23–32.
John, S. T., Sridharan, R., Kumar, P. R., & Krishnamoorthy, M. (2018). Multi-period reverse logistics network design for used refrigerators. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 54, 311–331.
Joshi, B. V., Vipin, B., Ramkumar, J., & Amit, R. K. (2021). Impact of policy instruments on lead-acid battery recycling: A system dynamics approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105528.
Kannan, D., Diabat, A., Alrefaei, M., Govindan, K., & Yong, G. (2012). A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 67, 75–79.
Kannan, G., Sasikumar, P., & Devika, K. (2010). A genetic algorithm approach for solving a closed loop supply chain model: A case of battery recycling. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(3), 655–670.
Martí, J. M. C., Tancrez, J. S., & Seifert, R. W. (2015). Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 129–142.
Mavrotas, G. (2009). Effective implementation of the \(\varepsilon \)-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213(2), 455–465.
Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-Da-Gama, F. (2006). Dynamic multi-commodity capacitated facility location: A mathematical modeling framework for strategic supply chain planning. Computers & Operations Research, 33(1), 181–208.
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. (2018). E-waste (management) amendment rules. Retrieved May 06, 2020, from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/453310/e-waste-management-amendment-rules-2018/.
Mishra, S., & Singh, S.P. (2020a). Designing dynamic reverse logistics network for post-sale service. Annals of Operations Research (forthcoming).
Mishra, S., Singh, S.P. (2020b). A stochastic disaster-resilient and sustainable reverse logistics model in big data environment. Annals of Operations Research (forthcoming)
Mohan, T. V. K., & Amit, R. K. (2020). Dismantlers’ dilemma in end-of-life vehicle recycling markets: A system dynamics model. Annals of Operations Research, 290, 591–619.
Nash, J., & Bosso, C. (2013). Extended producer responsibility in the United States. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(2), 175–185.
Park, J., Hong, S., Kim, I., Lee, J., & Hur, T. (2011). Dynamic material flow analysis of steel resources in korea. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(4), 456–462.
Pishvaee, M. S., & Razmi, J. (2012). Environmental supply chain network design using multi-objective fuzzy mathematical programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(8), 3433–3446.
Pishvaee, M. S., & Torabi, S. A. (2010). A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(20), 2668–2683.
Rahimi, M., & Ghezavati, V. (2018). Sustainable multi-period reverse logistics network design and planning under uncertainty utilizing conditional value at risk (cvar) for recycling construction and demolition waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1567–1581.
Rathore, P., Kota, S., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Sustainability through remanufacturing in India: A case study on mobile handsets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(15), 1709–1722.
Richa, K., Babbitt, C. W., Gaustad, G., & Wang, X. (2014). A future perspective on lithium-ion battery waste flows from electric vehicles. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 63–76.
Rosa, P., & Terzi, S. (2018). Improving end of life vehicle’s management practices: An economic assessment through system dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 520–536.
Solvang, W. D., & Yu, H. (2018). Incorporating flexible capacity in the planning of a multi-product multi-echelon sustainable reverse logistics network under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 285–303.
Stock, J. R., & Mulki, J. P. (2009). Product returns processing: An examination of practices of manufacturers, wholesalers/distributors, and retailers. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 33–62.
Tao, Z. G., Guang, Z. Y., Hao, S., Song, H. J., & Xin, D. G. (2015). Multi-period closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium with carbon emission constraints. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 354–365.
Üster, H., Easwaran, G., Akçali, E., & Çetinkaya, S. (2007). Benders decomposition with alternative multiple cuts for a multi-product closed-loop supply chain network design model. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 54(8), 890–907.
Wang, X., Gaustad, G., Babbitt, C. W., & Richa, K. (2014). Economies of scale for future lithium-ion battery recycling infrastructure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 53–62.
www.epa.gov. Global greenhouse gas emissions data. Retrieved May 31, 2021, from https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data.
Xu, Z., Pokharel, S., Elomri, A., & Mutlu, F. (2017). Emission policies and their analysis for the design of hybrid and dedicated closed-loop supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4152–4168.
Yu, H., & Solvang, W. D. (2017). A carbon-constrained stochastic optimization model with augmented multi-criteria scenario-based risk-averse solution for reverse logistics network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1248–1267.
Zarbakhshnia, N., Kannan, D., Kiani Mavi, R., & Soleimani, H. (2020). A novel sustainable multi-objective optimization model for forward and reverse logistics system under demand uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 295(2), 843–880.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shukla, M., Vipin, B. & Sengupta, R.N. Impact of dynamic flexible capacity on reverse logistics network design with environmental concerns. Ann Oper Res (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04565-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04565-y