Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An empirical examination of energy consumption, behavioral intention, and situational factors: evidence from Beijing

  • S.I.: Energy and Climate Policy Modeling
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increase in energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, promoting an energy-saving lifestyle among residents has become an urgent environmental and social need. Studying factors that influence household daily energy-saving behaviors may help the government draft policies for reducing the energy consumption and promoting the sustainable development of the human economic society. In this study, we investigate the features of energy-related situational factors, individual/household energy consumption behavioral norms, and energy-saving behavioral intentions by performing a questionnaire survey in Beijing. We examine the relationships among the mentioned aspects by applying factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Results show that among the three aspects assessed, situational factors most significantly and effectively influence the residents to assume energy-saving behaviors. Energy-saving behavioral norms partly mediate the relationship between situational factors and behavioral intention. We propose practice policy implications on the basis of the results. In particular, the positive influences of situational factors should be strengthened, and relevant policy measures should be emphasized to establish a situational background beneficial for accelerating the formation or transformation of energy-saving behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews-Speed, P. (2009). China’s ongoing energy efficiency drive: Origins, progress and prospects. Energy Policy, 37, 1331–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (1999). Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfi, S., Farsi, M., Filippini, M., & Jakob, M. (2008). Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings. Energy Economics, 30(2), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen, J. (2004). Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Economics, 26(1), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudet, H., Ardoin, N. M., Flora, J., Armel, K. C., Desai, M., & Robinson, T. N. (2014). Energy behaviours of northern California Girl Scouts and their families. Energy Policy, 73, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabander, B. D., & Thiers, G. (1984). Successful information system development in relation to situational factors which affect effective communication between MIS-Users and EDP-Specialists. Management Science., 30(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., Challenger, R., Clegg, C., & Healey, M. (2008). Understanding and promoting green behaviour in the use of existing buildings. London: Report to Arup plc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, L., & Gartrell, J. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahbakhsh, H., Ugursal, V. I., & Fung, A. S. (1998). A residential end-use energy consumption model for Canada. International Journal of Energy Research, 22(13), 1133–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An Introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2014). Household energy use: Applying behavioral economics to understand consumer decision-making and behavior. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1385–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerardine, D. S., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., Jette, R. D., & Katzell, R. A. (1985). The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on worker productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38(2), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R., Wesselink, B., Eichhammer, W., & Worrell, E. (2011). The unrecognized contribution of renewable energy to Europe’s energy savings target. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3425–3433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, H., & Roy, R. (2007). Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation, 27(4), 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomerad, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hori, S., kondo, K., Nogata, D., & Ben, H. (2013). The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. Energy Policy, 52, 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houri, A., & Ibrahim-Korfali, S. (2005). Residential energy consumption patterns: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Energy Research, 29(8), 755–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knussen, C., Yule, F., Kenzie, J. M., & Wells, M. (2004). An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Spaargaren, G., Heerink, N., Mol, A. P. J., & Wang, C. (2013). Energy consumption practices of rural households in north China: Basic characteristics and potential for low carbon development. Energy Policy, 55, 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Oosterveer, P., & Spaargaren, G. (2015). Promoting sustainable consumption in China: A conceptual framework and research review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loock, C., Staake, T., & Thiesse, F. (2013). Motivating energy-efficient behavior with green is: An investigation of goal setting and the role of defaults. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1313–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirosa, M., Lawson, R., & Gnoth, D. (2013). Linking personal values to energy-efficient behaviors in the home. Environment and Behavior, 45(4), 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2000). Motivational and volitional processes in action initiation: A field study of the role of implementation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 780–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H., Liu, Y., & Gao, H. (2015). Impact of agricultural industrial structure adjustment on energy conservation and income growth in Western China: A statistical study. Annals of Operations Research, 228, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, L. B., & Vanalle, R. M. (2014). Green supply chain management in Brazilian automotive sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25(5), 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1273–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shui, B., & Dowlatabadib, H. (2005). Consumer lifestyles approach to US energy use and the related CO\(_{2}\) emissions. Energy Policy, 33, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. Handbook of environmental psychology, 2, 1043–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Z. F., & Chen, G. J. (2008). The analysis on the strategies of sustainable energy development in Beijing. Energy Environment, 1, 2–3. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, B., Healy, K., Gibson, A., Ashish, A., Cody, P., Beres, D., et al. (2009). Power from perspective: Potential future United States energy portfolios. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1432–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2014). Voluntary response to energy conservation appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(1), 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. H., Zhang, B., & Li, G. (2014). Determinants of energy-saving behavioral intention among residents in Beijing: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 6(053127), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. H., Zhang, B., Yin, J. H., & Zhang, X. (2011). Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 977–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. H., Zhang, B., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behavior: Evidence from Beijing, China. Energy Policy, 39, 3550–3557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2005). Habits and the structure of motivation in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., Wei, Y. M., & Wang, K. (2012). A PSO-GA optimal model to estimate primary energy demand of China. Energy Policy, 42, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 71521002, 71403141, 71372019, 71573016, and 71471057), Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project [YETP1173], and Beijing Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China [11JGC106].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China

    Guo Li, Wenling Liu & Zhaohua Wang

  2. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China

    Guo Li, Wenling Liu & Zhaohua Wang

  3. Business School, Hunan University, Changsha, China

    Mengqi Liu

Authors
  1. Guo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenling Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaohua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengqi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengqi Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Liu, W., Wang, Z. et al. An empirical examination of energy consumption, behavioral intention, and situational factors: evidence from Beijing. Ann Oper Res 255, 507–524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2202-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2202-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation