Skip to main content
Log in

A tactical supply chain planning model with multiple flexibility options: an empirical evaluation

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supply chain flexibility is widely recognized as an approach to manage uncertainty. Uncertainty in the supply chain may arise from a number of sources such as demand and supply interruptions and lead time variability. A tactical supply chain planning model with multiple flexibility options incorporated in sourcing, manufacturing and logistics functions can be used for the analysis of flexibility adjustment in an existing supply chain. This paper develops such a tactical supply chain planning model incorporating a realistic range of flexibility options. A novel solution method is designed to solve the developed mixed integer nonlinear programming model. The utility of the proposed model and solution method is evaluated using data from an empirical case study. Analysis of the numerical results in different flexibility adjustment scenarios provides various managerial insights and practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alemany, M. M. E., Boj, J. J., Mula, J., & Lario, F.-C. (2010). Mathematical programming model for centralised master planning in ceramic tile supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 48(17), 5053–5074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Ayuso, A., Escudero, L. F., Garin, A., Ortuno, M. T., & Perez, G. (2003). An approach for strategic supply chain planning under uncertainty based on stochastic 0–1 programming. Journal of Global Optimization, 26(1), 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armentano, V. A., Shiguemoto, A. L., & Løkketangen, A. (2011). Tabu search with path relinking for an integrated production–distribution problem. Computers & Operations Research, 38(8), 1199–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydinel, M., Sowlati, T., Cerda, X., Cope, E., & Gerschman, M. (2008). Optimization of production allocation and transportation of customer orders for a leading forest products company. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 48(7–8), 1158–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashiri, M., Badri, H., & Talebi, J. (2012). A new approach to tactical and strategic planning in production–distribution networks. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(4), 1703–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, W. C. (2010). Purchasing and supply chain management (2nd ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgen, B. (2010). Application of fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the production allocation and distribution supply chain network problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4488–4495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, G. J., Carrillo, J. E., & Vakharia, A. J. (2007). Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvete, H. I., Galé, C., & Oliveros, M.-J. (2011). Bilevel model for production–distribution planning solved by using ant colony optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 38(1), 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che, Z. H. (2012). A particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving unbalanced supply chain planning problems. Applied Soft Computing, 12(4), 1279–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che, Z. H., & Chiang, C. J. (2010). A modified Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective build-to-order supply chain planning with product assembly. Advances in Engineering Software, 41(7–8), 1011–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Wang, W. (1997). A linear programming model for integrated steel production and distribution planning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(6), 592–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Wang, B., & Lee, W. (2003). Multiobjective optimization for a multienterprise supply chain network. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(9), 1879–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, K. (2011). Integrating effective flexibility measures into a strategic supply chain planning model. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(1), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, K., & Goetschalckx, M. (1999). A primal decomposition method for the integrated design of multi-period production–distribution systems. IIE Transactions, 31(11), 1027–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshragh, A., Filar, J., & Nazar, A. (2011). A Projection-Adapted Cross Entropy (PACE) method for transmission network planning. Energy Systems, 2(2), 189–208. doi:10.1007/s12667-011-0033-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeilikia, M., Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Govindan, K., Kumar, A., & Mo, J. (2014, in press). Tactical supply chain planning models with inherent flexibility: definition and review. Annals of Operations Research.

  • Fahimnia, B., Luong, L., & Marian, R. (2012). Genetic algorithm optimisation of an integrated aggregate production–distribution plan in supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 50(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia, B., Farahani, R. Z., Marian, R., & Luong, L. (2013a). A review and critique on integrated production–distribution planning models and techniques. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia, B., Farahani, R. Z., & Sarkis, J. (2013b). Integrated aggregate supply chain planning using memetic algorithm—a performance analysis case study. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5354–5373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garavelli, A. C. (2003). Flexibility configurations for the supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gen, M., & Syarif, A. (2005). Hybrid genetic algorithm for multi-time period production/distribution planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48(4), 799–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genin, P., Lamouri, S., & Thomas, A. (2008). Multi-facilities tactical planning robustness with experimental design. Production Planning & Control, 19(2), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis, M. C., Tsiakis, P., Longinidis, P., & Sofioglou, M. K. (2011). Optimal design of supply chain networks under uncertain transient demand variations. Omega, 39(3), 254–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giachetti, R. E., Martinez, L. D., Sáenz, O. A., & Chen, C.-S. (2003). Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Z. (2008). An economic evaluation model of supply chain flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(2), 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J., Purvis, L., & Naim, M. M. (2010). Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, G., Mele, F. D., Espuña, A., & Puigjaner, L. (2006). Addressing the design of chemical supply chains under demand uncertainty. In W. Marquardt & C. Pantelides (Eds.), Computer aided chemical engineering (Vol. 21, pp. 1095–1100). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson, H., & Rönnqvist, M. (2008). Solving a multi-period supply chain problem for a pulp company using heuristics—an application to Södra Cell AB. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson, H., Rönnqvist, M., & Carlsson, D. (2007). Integrated production and distribution planning for Södra Cell AB. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms, 6(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2000). A two-stage modeling and solution framework for multisite midterm planning under demand uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 39(10), 3799–3813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Maranas, C. D., & McDonald, C. M. (2000). Mid-term supply chain planning under demand uncertainty: customer demand satisfaction and inventory management. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24(12), 2613–2621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, Y.-J., Jang, S.-Y., Chang, B.-M., & Park, J. (2002). A combined model of network design and production/distribution planning for a supply network. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(1–2), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, V., & Pirkul, H. (2001). Planning and coordination of production and distribution facilities for multiple commodities. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolayemi, J. K., & Olorunniwo, F. O. (2004). A deterministic model for planning production quantities in a multi-plant, multi-warehouse environment with extensible capacities. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klibi, W., Martel, A., & Guitouni, A. (2010). The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopanos, G. M., Puigjaner, L., & Georgiadis, M. C. (2012). Simultaneous production and logistics operations planning in semicontinuous food industries. Omega, 40(5), 634–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lababidi, H. M. S., Ahmed, M. A., Alatiqi, I. M., & Al-Enzi, A. F. (2004). Optimizing the supply chain of a petrochemical company under uncertain operating and economic conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 43(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., & Kim, S. H. (2002). Production–distribution planning in supply chain considering capacity constraints. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(1–2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., Kim, S. H., & Moon, C. (2002). Production-distribution planning in supply chain using a hybrid approach. Production Planning & Control, 13(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, L., Liu, S., Ruszczynski, A., & Park, S. (2006). On the integrated production, inventory, and distribution routing problem. IIE Transactions, 38(11), 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, M. A. (2006). A variable neighborhood decomposition search method for supply chain management planning problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 959–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, M. A., & Ruszczyński, A. (2007). An efficient trajectory method for probabilistic production-inventory-distribution problems. Operations Research, 55(2), 378–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T.-F. (2008). Fuzzy multi-objective production/distribution planning decisions with multi-product and multi-time period in a supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(3), 676–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T.-F. (2011). Application of fuzzy sets to manufacturing/distribution planning decisions in supply chains. Information Sciences, 181(4), 842–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T.-F., & Cheng, H.-W. (2009). Application of fuzzy sets to manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multi-product and multi-time period in supply chains. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2, Part 2), 3367–3377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. J., Jeong, S. J., Kim, K. S., & Park, M. W. (2006). A simulation approach for production-distribution planning with consideration given to replenishment policies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(5), 593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-C., & Wang, T.-H. (2011). Build-to-order supply chain network design under supply and demand uncertainties. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 45(8), 1162–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijboom, B., & Obel, B. (2007). Tactical coordination in a multi-location and multi-stage operations structure: a model and a pharmaceutical company case. Omega, 35(3), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merschmann, U., & Thonemann, U. W. (2011). Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: an empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S. M. J., Malekly, H., & Aryanezhad, M. B. (2011). A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulou, A., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2012). Hybrid simulation based optimization approach for supply chain management. Computers & Chemical Engineering. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H.-C., & Karimi, I. A. (2006). Global multiproduct production–distribution planning with duty drawbacks. AIChE Journal, 52(2), 595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouhimmou, M., D’Amours, S., Beauregard, R., Ait-Kadi, D., & Chauhan, S. S. (2008). Furniture supply chain tactical planning optimization using a time decomposition approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), 952–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, A., Chan, F. T. S., Mahanty, B., & Tiwari, M. K. (2011). Aggregate procurement, production, and shipment planning decision problem for a three-echelon supply chain using swarm-based heuristics. International Journal of Production Research, 49(10), 2873–2905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, F., & Nagi, R. (2010). Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Computers & Operations Research, 37(4), 668–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peidro, D., Mula, J., Poler, R., & Verdegay, J.-L. (2009). Fuzzy optimization for supply chain planning under supply, demand and process uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(18), 2640–2657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peidro, D., Mula, J., Jiménez, M., & del Mar Botella, M. (2010). A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peidro, D., Mula, J., Alemany, M. M. E., & Lario, F.-C. (2011). Fuzzy multi-objective optimisation for master planning in a ceramic supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3011–3020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujawan, I. N. (2004). Assessing supply chain flexibility: a conceptual framework and case study. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 1(1), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, R. (1997). Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(1), 89–112. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(96)00385-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, R. (1999). The cross-entropy method for combinatorial and continuous optimization. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 1(2), 127–190. doi:10.1023/a:1010091220143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, R., & Kroese, D. (2004). The cross-entropy method: a unified approach to combinatorial optimization, Monte-Carlo simulation and machine learning. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabri, E. H., & Beamon, B. M. (2000). A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design. Omega, 28(5), 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safaei, A. S., Moattar Husseini, S. M., Z.-Farahani, R., Jolai, F., & Ghodsypour, S. H. (2010). Integrated multi-site production-distribution planning in supply chain by hybrid modelling. International Journal of Production Research, 48(14), 4043–4069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa, M., Nishizaki, I., & Uemura, Y. (2001). Fuzzy programming and profit and cost allocation for a production and transportation problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, A. M., & Pérez, M. P. (2005). Supply chain flexibility and firm performance: a conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(7), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, R. (2006). Interplay between uncertainty and flexibility across the value-chain: towards a transformation model of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 476–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, P., & Tomasgard, A. (2011). The impact of flexibility on operational supply chain planning. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2), 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selim, H., Araz, C., & Ozkarahan, I. (2008). Collaborative production–distribution planning in supply chain: a fuzzy goal programming approach. Transportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(3), 396–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z.-J. M. (2006). A profit-maximizing supply chain network design model with demand choice flexibility. Operations Research Letters, 34(6), 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 685–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrazas-Moreno, S., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). A multiscale decomposition method for the optimal planning and scheduling of multi-site continuous multiproduct plants. Chemical Engineering Science, 66(19), 4307–4318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi, S. A., & Hassini, E. (2009). Multi-site production planning integrating procurement and distribution plans in multi-echelon supply chains: an interactive fuzzy goal programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47(19), 5475–5499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J.-F. (2007). An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), 982–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varthanan, P. A., Murugan, N., Kumar, G., & Parameswaran, S. (2012a). Development of simulation-based AHP-DPSO algorithm for generating multi-criteria production–distribution plan. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(1–4), 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varthanan, P. A., Murugan, N., & Kumar, G. M. (2012b). A simulation based heuristic discrete particle swarm algorithm for generating integrated production–distribution plan. Applied Soft Computing, 12(9), 3034–3050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. N., Calantone, R., & Dröge, C. (1999). Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, P., & Çatay, B. (2006). Strategic level three-stage production distribution planning with capacity expansion. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(4), 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, F., & Grossmann, I. E. (2008). Design of responsive supply chains under demand uncertainty. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(12), 3090–3111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Fahimnia.

Appendix: Parameters and decision variables

Appendix: Parameters and decision variables

Input parameters

d iet :

Demand for product i in end-user e at period t

f pt :

Fixed cost of opening and operating plant p at period t

\(f'_{wt}\) :

Fixed cost of opening and operating DC w at period t

\(a_{ipt}^{1st}\) :

Unit production cost in regular-time (in the first period of plant opening) for product i in plant p at period t

\(a_{\ ipt}^{' 1st}\) :

Unit production cost in overtime (in the first period of plant opening) for product i in plant p at period t

a ipt :

Unit production cost in regular-time (from the second period onward) for product i in plant p at period t

\(a'_{ipt}\) :

Unit production cost in overtime (from the second period onward) for product i in plant p at period t

r ipt :

Unit cost of outsourcing product i by plant p at period t

h cpt :

Unit holding cost of component c in plant p at period t

\(h'_{ipt}\) :

Unit holding cost of product i in plant p at period t

b iet :

Cost of backlogging product i in end-user e at period t

ϕ ci :

Quantity of component c used to produce one unit of product i

ω cpt :

Maximum holding capacity of component c in plant p at period t

\(\overline{\omega}_{ipt}\) :

Maximum holding capacity of product i in plant p at period t

ν iet :

Maximum allowed backlog for product i in end-user e at period t

ρ ipt :

Maximum capacity for regular-time production of product i in plant p at period t

\(\overline{\rho}_{ipt}\) :

Maximum capacity for overtime production of product i in plant p at period t

ζ ipt :

Maximum capacity for outsourcing product i in plant p at period t

pc cspt :

Base purchasing cost (highest rate at lowest quantity range) for the acquisition of component c from supplier s for plant p at period t

α cspt :

Discount multiplier for purchasing component c from supplier s for plant p at period t

\(pq_{cspt}^{low}\) :

Lower quantity break-point for component c offered by supplier s to plant p at period t

\(pq_{cspt}^{up}\) :

Upper quantity break-point for component c offered by supplier s to plant p at period t

π cspt :

Lower discount rate (for medium quantity range) for purchasing component c from supplier s for plant p at period t

ψ cspt :

Higher discount rate (for large quantity range) for purchasing component c from supplier s for plant p at period t

\(pq_{cspt}^{\min}\) :

Minimum allowed purchase quantity of component c from supplier s for plant p at period t

\(pq_{cspt}^{\max}\) :

Maximum capacity of supplier s for component c to supply plant p at period t

\(\varepsilon_{s}^{\min}\) :

Minimum purchase quantity from supplier s during the planning horizon

τ ipwlmt :

Unit transportation cost for the shipment of product i from plant p to DC w by logistics provider l using transport mode m at period t

\(\overline{\tau}_{iwelmt}\) :

Unit transportation cost for the shipment of product i from DC w to end-user e by logistics provider l using transport mode m at period t

\(\overline{\overline{\tau}}_{ipelmt}\) :

Unit transportation cost for the shipment of product i from plant p to end-user e by logistics provider l using transport mode m at period t

\(tq_{ipwlmt}^{\min}\) :

Minimum allowed shipping quantity of product i from plant p to DC w by logistics provider l using mode m at period t

\(tq_{ipwlmt}^{\max}\) :

Maximum allowed shipping quantity of product i from plant p to DC w by logistics provider l using mode m at period t

\(\overline{tq}_{iwelmt}^{\,\min}\) :

Minimum allowed shipping quantity of product i from DC w to end-user e by logistics provider l using mode m at period t

\(\overline{tq}_{iwelmt}^{\,\max}\) :

Maximum allowed shipping quantity of product i from DC w to end-user e by logistics provider l using mode m at period t

\(\overline{\overline{tq}}_{ipelmt}^{\,\min}\) :

Minimum allowed shipping quantity of product i from plant p to end-user e by logistics provider l using mode m at period t

\(\overline{\overline{tq}}_{ipelmt}^{\,\max}\) :

Maximum allowed shipping quantity of product i from plant p to end-user e by logistics provider l using mode m at period t

\(\overline{\varepsilon}_{l}^{\,\min}\) :

Minimum allowed shipment quantity delegated to logistics provider l during the planning horizon

k iwt :

Unit storage cost for holding product i in self-owned DC w at period t

\(k'_{iwt}\) :

Unit storage cost for holding product i in rental warehouse w at period t

γ iwt :

Storage multiplier for holding product i in self-owned DC and/or rental warehouse w at period t

η iwt :

Maximum capacity of self-owned DC w for storing product i at period t

\(\overline{\eta}_{iwt}\) :

Maximum capacity of rental warehouse w for storing product i at period t

Independent decision variables

Q cspt :

Quantity of component c purchased from supplier s for plant p at period t

A ipt :

Quantity of product i produced in regular-time in plant p at period t

\(A'_{ipt}\) :

Quantity of product i produced in overtime in plant p at period t

R ipt :

Quantity of product i outsourced by plant p at period t

X cpt :

Quantity of component c stored in plant p at period t

\(X'_{ipt}\) :

Quantity of product i stored in plant p at period t

J ipwlmt :

Quantity of product i shipped from plant p to DC w by logistics provider l using transport mode m at period t

\(J'_{iwelmt}\) :

Quantity of product i shipped from DC w to end-user e by logistics provider l using transport mode m at period t

\(J'_{ipelmt}\) :

Quantity of product i shipped from plant p to end-user e by logistics provider l using transport mode m at period t

Y iwt :

Quantity of product i stored in the self-owned DC w and the linked rental warehouse w at period t

B iet :

Quantity of product i backlogged in end-user e at period t

G pt =:

\( \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad }l} 1, &\mbox{if plant}\ p\ \mbox{is open at period}\ t\\ 0, &\mbox{otherwise} \end{array} \right .\)

\(G'_{wt} =\) :

\( \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, &\mbox{if DC}\ w\ \mbox{is open at period}\ t \\ 0, &\mbox{otherwise} \end{array} \right .\)

U cspt =:

\( \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, &\mbox{if component}\ c\ \mbox{is purchased form supplier}\ s\ \mbox{for plant}\ p\ \mbox{at period}\ t\\ 0, &\mbox{otherwise} \end{array} \right .\)

V ipwlmt =:

\( \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, &\mbox{if product}\ i\ \mbox{is shipped from plant}\ p\ \mbox{to DC}\ w\ \mbox{by logistics}\ \mbox{provider}\ l \\ & \mbox{using transport mode}\ m\ \mbox{at period}\ t \\ 0, &\mbox{otherwise} \end{array} \right .\)

\(V'_{iwelmt} =\) :

\( \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, &\mbox{if product}\ i\ \mbox{is shipped from DC}\ w\ \mbox{to}\ \mbox{end-user}\ e\ \mbox{by}\ \mbox{logistics}\ \mbox{provider}\ l \\ & \mbox{using}\ \mbox{transport}\ \mbox{mode}\ m\ \mbox{at period}\ t \\ 0, &\mbox{otherwise} \end{array} \right .\)

\(V''_{ipelmt} =\) :

\( \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, &\mbox{if product}\ i\ \mbox{is shipped from plant}\ p\ \mbox{to end-user}\ e\ \mbox{by logistics provider}\ l\\ & \mbox{using transport mode}\ m\ \mbox{at period}\ t\\ 0, &\mbox{otherwise} \end{array} \right .\)

Dependent decision variables

\(\alpha_{cspt} = \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1 & pq_{cspt}^{\min} \leq Q_{cspt} \leq pq_{cspt}^{low} \\[3pt] \pi_{cspt} & pq_{cspt}^{low} < Q_{cspt} \leq pq_{cspt}^{up} \\[3pt] \psi_{cspt} & pq_{cspt}^{up} < Q_{cspt} \leq pq_{cspt}^{\max} \end{array} \right . \quad \forall c, s,p, t \)

\(\gamma_{iwt} = \left \{ \begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, &Y_{iwt} \leq \eta_{iwt} \\[3pt] 0, &\eta_{iwt} < Y_{iwt} \leq \eta_{iwt} + \overline{\eta}_{iwt} \end{array} \right . \quad \forall i, w, t \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esmaeilikia, M., Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. et al. A tactical supply chain planning model with multiple flexibility options: an empirical evaluation. Ann Oper Res 244, 429–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1513-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1513-2

Keywords

Navigation