Skip to main content
Log in

A dominance based rough set classification system for fault diagnosis in electrical smart grid environments

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, power grid monitoring systems are shifting towards more disseminating and distributive operations. The diagnosis of faults using knowledge discovery techniques has become an essential component of the process, accounting to the challenges faced by the electrical power monitoring systems. The system’s operators employ various energy management techniques which play important roles in the overall management, reliability and operational sustainability of smart grid utilities. Sometimes, these systems are disrupted by events like a short circuit in the system or any external incursion that could pose a threat to the public safety as well as to the critical infrastructure of the grid. This paper aims at providing a robust system for fault diagnosis using the status of an intelligent electronic device and circuit breakers which can be tripped by any kind of fault. To protect the system from vulnerabilities and different kinds of faults, a multilayered fault estimation classifier, based on the Dominance based rough set is proposed. This technique provides an effective solution to the system’s operator for the proper diagnosis of the faults and intrusions by classifying the state of the system. In addition to this, the operator can take preventative measures to protect the system from further damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander D, Erman M, Dunham W, Trot B (2014) US concerned power grid vulnerable to cyber-attack. http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/04/08/cyberattack-usa-idINN0853911920090408. Accessed 9 April 2014

  • Ali R, Siddiqi MH, Lee S (2015) Rough set-based approaches for discretization: a compact review. Artif Intell Rev 44:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves da Silva AP, Insfran AHF, da Silveira PM, Lambert-Torres G (1992) Neural networks for fault location in substations. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 7(2):986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham J, Gamez D, Ning Lu (2003) Safeguarding SCADA systems with anomaly detection. Comput Netw Secur 2776:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho MP, Lambert-Torres G, da Silva LEB, Lazarek H (2006) Detecting attacks in power system critical infrastructure using rough classification algorithm. Proc First Int Conf Forensic Comput Sci 1(1):93–99 Brazil

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1999) The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM, chapter 14. Adv Mult Criteria Decis Mak 21:397–455

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2001) Rough sets methodology for multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 129(1):1–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowiński R (2010) Dominance-based rough set approach to decision under uncertainty and time preference. Ann Oper Res 176(1):41–75

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2010) A summary and update of Granular computing and data mining for ordered data: the dominance-based rough set approach. In: IEEE international conference granular computing, pp 20–21

  • Hor CL, Crossley PA (2005) Extracting knowledge from substations for decision support. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(2):595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hor CL, Crossley PA (2006) Substation event analysis using information from intelligent electronic devices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 28(6):374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezunovic M, Rikalo I (1996) Detect and classify faults using neural nets. IEEE Comput Appl Power 9(4):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusunoki Y, Inuiguchi M (2010) A unified approach to reducts in dominance-based rough set approach. Soft Comput 14(5):507–515

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJ, Yen L, Tzeng GH (2010) Using decision rules to achieve mass customization of airline services. Eur J Oper Res 205(3):680–686

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJ (2011) Variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach to formulate airline service strategies. Appl Soft Comput 11(5):4011–4020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJ, Tzeng GH (2010) A dominance-based rough set approach to customer behavior in the airline market. Inf Sci 180(11):2230–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak B, Munakata T (2002) Rule extraction from expert heuristics: a comparative study of rough sets with neural networks and ID3. Eur J Oper Res 136(1):212–229

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli M, Tronci E, Dipoppa G, Balducelli C (2004) Electric power system anomaly detection using neural networks. Knowl Based Intell Inf Eng Syst 3213:1242–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Othman ML, Aris I, Abdullah SM, Ali M, Othman MR (2009) Discovering decision algorithm of numerical distance relay using rough-set-theory-based data mining. Eur J Sci Res 33(1):30–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel A, Taghavi M, Bakhtiyari K, Celestino J Jr (2013) An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: a systematic review. J Netw Comput Appl 36(1):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Inf Comput Sci 11(5):341–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rawat S, Rawat S (2016) Multi-sensor data fusion by a hybrid methodology—a comparative study. Comput Indus 75:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid N, Naqvi IH, Qaisar SB (2012) Characteristics and classification of outlier detection techniques for wireless sensor networks in harsh environments: a survey. Artif Intell Rev 43(2):193–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slowinski R, Greco S, Matarazzo B (2012) Rough set and rule-based multicriteria decision aiding. Pesqui Oper 32(2):213–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Q, Zhou J, Guerrero JM, Zhang H (2015) Hybrid three-phase/single-phase microgrid architecture with power management capabilities. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(10):5964–5977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu FF, Moslehi K, Bose A (2005) Power system control centers: past, present, and future. Proc IEEE 93(11):1890–1908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai LY, Khoo LP, Zhong ZW (2009) A dominance-based rough set approach to Kansei Engineering in product development. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Liang H, Liu D (2004) Two new operators in rough set theory with applications to fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 166(1):147–165

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Han Z, Wen F (1997) A new approach for fault diagnosis in power systems based on rough set theory. In: Proceedings of the 4th intemational conference on advances in power system control, operation and management, APSCOM-97, Hong Kong, pp 597–602

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarvesh Rawat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rawat, S., Patel, A., Celestino, J. et al. A dominance based rough set classification system for fault diagnosis in electrical smart grid environments. Artif Intell Rev 46, 389–411 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9468-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9468-8

Keywords

Navigation