Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prioritization of Evidence-Based and Evidence-Informed Interventions for Retention in Medical Care for Persons with HIV

  • Substantive Review
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up to 50% of those diagnosed with HIV in the U.S. are not retained in medical care. Care retention provides opportunity to monitor benefits of HIV therapy and enable viral suppression. To increase retention, there is a need to prioritize best practices appropriate for translation and dissemination for real-world implementation. Eighteen interventions from CDC’s Compendium of Evidence-Based Interventions were scored using the RE-AIM framework to determine those most suitable for dissemination. A CDC Division of HIV Prevention workgroup developed a RE-AIM scale with emphasis on the Implementation and Maintenance dimensions and less emphasis on the Efficacy dimension since all 18 interventions were already identified as evidence-based or evidence-informed. Raters referenced primary efficacy publications and scores were averaged for a ranked RE-AIM score for interventions. Of 18 interventions, four included care linkage and 7 included viral suppression outcomes. Interventions received between 20.6 and 35.3 points (45 maximum). Scores were converted into a percentage of the total possible with ranges between 45.8 and 78.4%. Top four interventions were ARTAS (78.4%); Routine Screening for HIV (RUSH) (73.2%); Optn4Life (67.4%) and Virology Fast Track (65.9%). All four scored high on Implementation and Maintenance dimensions. Select items within the scale were applicable to health equity, covering topics such as reaching under-served focus populations and acceptability to that population. Navigation-enhanced Case Management (NAV) scored highest on the health equity subscale. RE-AIM prioritization scores will inform dissemination and translation efforts, help clinical staff select feasible interventions for implementation, and support sustainability for those interventions.

Resumen

Hasta el 50% de las personas diagnosticadas con VIH en USA no son retenidos en cuidados médicos impactando su monitoreo y supresión viral. Dieciocho intervenciones de retención fueron evaluadas utilizando el marco RE-AIM para determinar su adecuación para la difusión. Evaluadores promediaron las intervenciones. Cuatro intervenciones incluyeron enlace de atención y 7 supresión viral. Las cuatro intervenciones principales fueron ARTAS, detección de rutina para el VIH, Optn4Life y Vía rápida de virología. Elementos del marco fueron usados para evaluar equidad en salud y cubrieron temas de cómo llegar a las poblaciones desatendidas y la aceptabilidad de esa población. La intervención gestión de casos para mejorar con navegación (NAV) obtuvo la puntuación más alta en la subescala de equidad. RE-AIM y los puntajes de priorización de equidad informarán los esfuerzos de difusión y traducción, ayudarán al personal clínico a seleccionar las intervenciones para la implementación y apoyarán la sostenibilidad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mugavero MJ, Lin HY, Willig JH, et al. Missed visits and mortality among patients establishing initial outpatient HIV treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(2):248–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/595705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ulett KB, Willig JH, Lin HY, et al. The therapeutic implications of timely linkage and early retention in HIV care. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23(1):41–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, et al. Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2428–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30418-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Crepaz N, Tang T, Marks G, et al. Durable viral suppression and transmission risk potential among persons with diagnosed HIV infection: United States, 2012–2013. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(7):976–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):830–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yehia BR, Kangovi S, Frank I. Patients in transition: avoiding detours on the road to HIV treatment success. AIDS. 2013;27(10):1529–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). HIV/AIDS bureau performance measures. United States Department of Health and Human Services. https://hab.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hab/clinical-quality-management/coremeasures.pdf (2017).

  8. Yehia BR, Stewart L, Momplaisir F, et al. Barriers and facilitators to patient retention in HIV care. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, et al. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(6):793–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Maulsby C, Enobun B, Batey DS, et al. A mixed-methods exploration of the needs of people living with HIV (PLWH) enrolled in access to care, a national HIV linkage, retention and re-engagement in medical care program. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(3):819–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Moitra E, LaPlante A, Armstrong ML, et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial of acceptance-based behavior therapy to promote HIV acceptance, HIV disclosure, and retention in medical care. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(9):2641–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bulsara SM, Wainberg ML, Newton-John TR. Predictors of adult retention in HIV care: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(3):752–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Knowlton AR, Hua W, Latkin C. Social support networks and medical service use among HIV-positive injection drug users: implications to intervention. AIDS Care-Psychol Socio-Med Asp AIDS/HIV. 2005;17(4):479–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data – United States and 6 dependent areas, 2019. National Profile | Volume 26 Number 2 | HIV Surveillance | Reports | Resource Library | HIV/AIDS | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance/vol-26-no-2/content/national-profile.html. Accessed February 7, 2022.

  15. National Institutes of Health. Starting antiretroviral treatment early improves outcomes for HIV-infected individuals. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/starting-antiretroviraltreatment-early-improves-outcomes-hiv-infected-individuals.

  16. Skarbinski J, Rosenberg E, Paz-Bailey G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission at each step of the care continuum in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):588–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hull MW, Wu ZY, Montaner JSG. Optimizing the engagement of care cascade: a critical step to maximize the impact of HIV treatment as prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7(6):579–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundberg BE, Davidson AJ, Burman WJ. Epidemiology of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in an era of effective prophylaxis: the relative contribution of non-adherence and drug failure. AIDS. 2000;14(16):2559–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tripathi A, Youmans E, Gibson JJ, et al. The impact of retention in early HIV medical care on viro-immunological parameters and survival: a statewide study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27(7):751–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Samji H, Cescon A, Hogg RS, et al. Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12): e81355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mugavero MJ, Amico KR, Horn T, et al. The state of engagement in HIV care in the United States: from cascade to continuum to control. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(8):1164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mugavero MJ, Westfall AO, Cole SR, et al. Beyond core indicators of retention in HIV care: missed clinic visits are independently associated with all-cause mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(10):1471–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Higa DH, Marks G, Crepaz N, et al. Interventions to improve retention in HIV primary care: a systematic review of US studies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012;9(4):313–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liau A, Crepaz N, Lyles CM, et al. Interventions to promote linkage to and utilization of HIV medical care among HIV-diagnosed persons: a qualitative systematic review, 1996–2011. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):1941–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Higa DH, Crepaz N, Mullins MM. Identifying best practices for increasing linkage to, retention, and re-engagement in HIV medical care: findings from a systematic review, 1996–2014. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(5):951–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams WO, Uhl G, Eke A, et al. CDC’s community-based organization behavioral outcomes project: perspectives for researchers, implementers and funders. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(1):284–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1261–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2003;27:3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, et al. RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004;28(2):75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1323–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Glasgow RE, Battaglia C, McCreight M, et al. Making implementation science more rapid: use of the RE-AIM framework for mid-course adaptations across five health services research projects in the veterans health administration. Front Public Health. 2020;8:194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Project. Compendium of Evidence-Based Interventions and Best Practices for HIV Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap/prb/prs/index.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2022.

  33. Gardner L, Metsch LR, Anderson-Mahoney P, et al. Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care. AIDS. 2005;19:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Irvine MK, Chamberlin SA, Robbins RS, et al. Improvements in HIV care engagement and viral load suppression following enrollment in a comprehensive HIV care coordination program. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(2):298–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner LI, Marks G, Craw JA, et al. A low-effort, clinic-wide intervention improves attendance for HIV primary care. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1124–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gardner LI, Giordano TP, Marks G, et al. Enhanced personal contact with HIV patients improves retention in primary care: a randomized trial in 6 US HIV clinics. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(5):725–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gaglio B, Shoup A, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Flash CA, Pasalar S, Hemmige V, et al. Benefits of a routine opt-out HIV testing and linkage to care program for previously diagnosed patients in publicly funded emergency room departments in Houston, TX. JAIDS. 2015;69:S8–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. HIV Implementation Science Coordination Initiative (ISCI). HIV Implementation Outcomes Crosswalk & Data Collection Form. hivimpsci.northwestern.edu. Updated May 9, 2022. Accessed September 21, 2022. https://hivimpsci.northwestern.edu/implementation-outcomes-crosswalk/

  40. Zurlo DP, Haynos A, et al. OPT-In for Life: a mobile technology-based intervention to improve HIV care continuum for young adults living with HIV. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(5):727–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Robbins GK, Lester W, Johnson KL, et al. Efficacy of a clinical decision-support system in an HIV practice: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:757–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Myers JJ, Dufour MK, Koeste KA, et al. The effect of patient navigation on the likelihood of engagement in clinical care for HIV-infected individuals leaving jail. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:385–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lucas GM, Chaudrhy A, Hsu J, et al. Clinic-based treatment of opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients versus referral to an opioid treatment program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:704–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Tanner AE, Song EY, Mann-Jackson L, et al. Preliminary impact of the weCare social media intervention to support health for young men who have sex with men and transgender women with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32:450–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tanner AE, Mann L, Song E, et al. weCare: a social media-based intervention designed to increase HIV care linkage, retention, and health outcomes for racially and ethnically diverse young MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(3):216–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Davila JA, Miertschin N, Sansgiry S, et al. Centralization of HIV services in HIV-positive African American and Hispanic youth improves retention in care. AIDS Care. 2013;25:202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hightow-Weidman LB, Smith JC, Valera E, et al. Keeping them in “STYLE”: finding, linking, and retaining young HIV-positive black and Latino men who have sex with men in care. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011;25:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Dillingham R, Ingersoll K, Flickinger TE, et al. PositiveLinks: a mobile health intervention for retention in HIV care and clinical outcomes with 12-month follow-up. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32(6):241–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bouris A, Jaffe K, Eavou R, et al. Project nGage: results from a randomized controlled trial of a dyadic network support intervention to retain young black men who have sex with men in HIV care. AIDS Behav. 2017;47:3618–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cunningham WE, Weiss RE, Nakazono T. Effectiveness of a peer navigation intervention to sustain viral suppression among HIV-positive men and transgender women released from jail: the LINK LA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(4):542–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. El-Sadr WM, Donnell D, Beauchamp G, et al. Financial incentives for linkage to care and viral suppression among HIV-positive patients: a randomized clinical trial (HPTN 065). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(8):1083–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. El-Sadr WM, Beauchamp G, Hall HI, et al. Durability of the effect of financial incentives on HIV viral load suppression and continuity in care: HPTN 065 study. JAIDS. 2019;81(3):300–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Enriquez M, Farnan R, Cheng AL, et al. Impact of a bilingual/bicultural care team on HIV-related health outcomes. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2008;19:295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Byrd KK, Hardnett F, Clay PG, et al. Retention in HIV care among participants in the patient-centered HIV care model: a collaboration between community-based pharmacists and primary medical providers. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019;33(2):58–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Byrd KK, Hou JG, Bush T, et al. Adherence and viral suppression among participants of the patient-centered HIV care model project—a collaboration between community-based pharmacists and HIV clinical providers. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;70(5):789–97.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Byrd KK, Hardnett F, Hou JG, et al. Improvements in retention in care and HIV viral suppression among persons with HIV and comorbid mental health conditions: patient-Centered HIV Care Model. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(12):3522–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Shrestha RK, Schommer JC, Taitel MS, et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of the Patient-Centered HIV Care Model: a collaboration between community-based pharmacists and primary medical providers. JAIDS. 2020;85(3):e48–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Disclaimer required by the CDC: The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Funding

Funding was provided by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CBC, Jr., MP, KHM, YG, JT, CW, JA, JA, DH and CL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CBC, Jr. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors whose names appear on the submission: (1) made substantial contributions to the design of the RE-AIM instrument used in the analysis and interpretation of data; (2) drafted sections of the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; (3) approved the version to be cleared by the CDC and then submitted for publication; and (4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. As a review article, Charles B Collins, Jr. and Cindy Lyles had the initial idea for the article, Darrel Higa performed the literature search, data analysis was conducted by all listed authors, Charles B. Collins, Jr. wrote the first draft, and all other authors critically revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles B. Collins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collins, C.B., Higa, D., Taylor, J. et al. Prioritization of Evidence-Based and Evidence-Informed Interventions for Retention in Medical Care for Persons with HIV. AIDS Behav 27, 2285–2297 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03958-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03958-1

Keywords

Navigation