Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators of PrEP Uptake Among Women in Substance Use Treatment and Syringe Service Programs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PrEP is an HIV prevention option that could benefit substance-involved women, a high-risk population with low PrEP uptake. Little is known about their interest in PrEP. This qualitative study used in-depth interviews to examine PrEP willingness, barriers, and facilitators among 16 women in outpatient psychosocial substance use treatment, methadone, and/or harm reduction/syringe programs in NYC. All expressed willingness to use PrEP, but only during periods of perceived risk. Women perceived themselves to be at high risk for HIV when engaging in active substance use and/or transactional sex. They perceived themselves to be at low risk and therefore unmotivated to take PrEP when abstinent from these activities. Paradoxically, a major barrier to using PrEP was anticipated interference from substance use and transactional sex, the very same activities that create a perception of risk. Facilitators of PrEP use included perceptions of it as effortless (as opposed to barrier methods during sex) and effective, safe, and accessible. Other barriers included fear of stigma and doubts about adhering daily. Recommendations for best PrEP implementation practices for substance-involved women included tailored and venue-specific PrEP information and messaging, PrEP discussion with trusted medical providers, and on-site PrEP prescription in substance use treatment and harm reduction programs.

Resumen

PrEP es una opción de prevención de VIH que puede beneficiar a las mujeres que consumen sustancias, una población de alto riesgo con baja aceptación de la PrEP, pero poco se sabe de su interés en la PrEP. Este estudio cualitativo utilizó entrevistas para examinar el interés en tomar la PrEP y las barreras y los facilitadores del uso de la PrEP entre 16 mujeres en tratamiento por el uso de sustancias en clínicas ambulatorias, clínicas metadonas, o programas de reducción de daños en la ciudad de Nueva York, Estados Unidos. Todas las participantes expresaron su disposición a usar PrEP, pero solo durante períodos de riesgo percibido (por ejemplo, tiempos de uso de sustancias activas y/o sexo transaccional). Paradójicamente, una barrera importante para el uso de PrEP fue la interferencia anticipada por el uso de sustancias y el sexo transaccional, las mismas actividades que crean una percepción de riesgo. Los facilitadores incluyeron percepciones de PrEP como sin esfuerzo durante las relaciones sexuales, efectiva, segura, y accesible. Otras barreras incluyeron el miedo del estigma y dudas sobre la adherencia diaria. Las recomendaciones para las mejores prácticas de implementar la PrEP para mujeres que consumen sustancias incluyeron información y mensajes de PrEP personalizados y específicos del lugar, discusión de PrEP con proveedores médicos confiables, y prescripción de PrEP en el sitio en programas de tratamiento y reducción de daños por uso de sustancias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data and material can be made available on request as permitted by Institutional Review Board approval.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Spinner CD, Boesecke C, Zink A, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): A review of current knowledge of oral systemic HIV PrEP in humans. Infection. 2016;44(2):151–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0850-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegler AJ, Mouhanna F, Giler RM, et al. The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis-to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(12):841–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report,. 2019, vol. 32. 2021. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.

  4. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. HIV among women in New York City,. 2018. 2019. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/dires/hiv-aids-in-women.pdf.

  5. Yun K, Xu J-J, Zhang J, et al. Female and younger subjects have lower adherence in PrEP trials: a meta-analysis with implications for the uptake of PrEP service to prevent HIV. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;94(3):163–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang C, McMahon J, Simmons J, Brown LL, Nash R, Liu Y. Suboptimal HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness and willingness to use among women who use drugs in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(10):2641–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02573-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Auerbach JD, Smith LR. Theoretical foundations of research focused on HIV prevention among substance-involved women: A review of observational and intervention studies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Supplement 2):146–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV diagnoses.. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/group/gender/women/cdc-hiv-women.pdf.

  9. El-Bassel N, Terlikbaeva A, Pinkham S. HIV and women who use drugs: Double neglect, double risk. Lancet. 2010;376(9738):312–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61026-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen LR, Tross S, Pavlicova M, Hu M-C, Campbell AN, Nunes EV. Substance use, childhood sexual abuse, and sexual risk behavior among women in methadone treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35(5):305–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990903060127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Patton R, Blow FC, Bohnert ASB, Bonar EE, Barry KL, Walton MA. Prevalence and correlates of transactional sex among an urban emergency department sample: Exploring substance use and HIV risk. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(2):625–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hutton HE, Lesko CR, Li X, et al. Alcohol use patterns and subsequent sexual behaviors among women, men who have sex with men and men who have sex with women engaged in routine HIV care in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(6):1634–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2337-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wechsberg WM, Deren S, Myers B, et al. Gender-specific HIV prevention interventions for women who use alcohol and other drugs: The evolution of the science and future directions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Suppl 2):128-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoner MCD, Haley DF, Golin CE, Adimora AA, Pettifor A. The relationship between economic deprivation, housing instability and transactional sex among women in North Carolina (HPTN 064). AIDS Behav. 2019;23(11):2946–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02611-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Bassel N, Strathdee SA. Women who use or inject drugs: An action agenda for women-specific, multilevel, and combination HIV prevention and research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Suppl 2):182-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Felsher M, Ziegler E, Smith LR, et al. An exploration of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation among women who inject drugs. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(6):2205–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01684-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Walters SM, Reilly KH, Neaigus A, Braunstein S. Awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women who inject drugs in NYC: The importance of networks and syringe exchange programs for HIV prevention. Harm Reduct J 2017;14(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0166-x.

  18. MacAfee LK, Harfmann RF, Cannon LM, et al. Substance use treatment patient and provider perspectives on accessing sexual and reproductive health services: Barriers, facilitators, and the need for integration of care. Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(1):95–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1656255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Benning L, Mantsios A, Kerrigan D, et al. Examining adherence barriers among women with HIV to tailor outreach for long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01011-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications; 2014.

  21. Golden SD, Earp JAL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: Twenty years of Health Education & Behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39:364–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. Health Behav Health Educ. 2008;4:465–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Becker MH. The health belief model and sick role behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):354–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cousin G. New approaches to qualitative research. Routledge; 2010.

  26. Hirschhorn LR, Brown RN, Friedman EE, et al. Black cisgender women’s PrEP knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and experience in Chicago. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;84(5):497–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000002377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Calabrese SK. Understanding, contextualizing, and addressing PrEP stigma to enhance PrEP implementation. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(6):579–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00533-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gwadz M, Leonard NR, Honig S, Freeman R, Kutnick A, Ritchie AS. Doing battle with “the monster”: How high-risk heterosexuals experience and successfully manage HIV stigma as a barrier to HIV testing. Int J Equity Health 2018;17(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0761-9.

  29. Jaiswal J, Dunlap K, Griffin M, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, acceptability and potential stigma among medical and non-medical clinic staff in methadone treatment settings in northern New Jersey: The key role of non-medical staff in enhancing HIV prevention. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;129(108371):108371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bradley E, Forsberg K, Betts JE, et al. Factors affecting pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation for women in the United States: A systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(9):1272–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jo Y, Bartholomew TS, Doblecki-Lewis S, et al. Interest in linkage to PrEP among people who inject drugs accessing syringe services; Miami, Florida. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Brooks RA, Landrian A, Lazalde G, Galvan FH, Liu H, Chen Y-T. Predictors of awareness, accessibility and acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among English- and Spanish-speaking Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles, California. J Immigr Minor Health. 2020;22(4):708–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00955-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah HS, Grieb SMD, Flores-Miller A, et al. Sólo Se Vive Una Vez: Evaluation of a social marketing campaign promoting HIV screening and prevention for immigrant Latinxs. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(9):3024–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03165-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Walters SM, Frank D, Van Ham B, Jaiswal J, Muncan B, Earnshaw V, Ompad DC. PrEP care continuum engagement among persons who inject drugs: Rural and urban differences in stigma and social infrastructure. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(4).

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Center Grant (P30-MH43520; Remien, PI). Dr. Ertl was also supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Training Grant (T32-MH19139; Sandfort, PI) as well as a training grant funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R25DA050687-01A1; Valdez, PI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: ST, SH; Data collection: ST, SH, HB, ET; Data coding and analysis: ST, SH, ET, HB, AS, ME; Manuscript preparation, ST, SH, AS, ME. Manuscript review and editing: ET, HB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Tross.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing interests

We the authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethics Approval

All study procedures and forms were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of New York State Psychiatric Institute at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.

Consent to Participate

All participants received full informed consent prior to their voluntary participation.

Consent for Publication

All authors have contributed to this work and agree to submit it for publication in its current form. No data or images are reproduced in this submission without proper permissions.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tross, S., Spector, A.Y., Ertl, M.M. et al. A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators of PrEP Uptake Among Women in Substance Use Treatment and Syringe Service Programs. AIDS Behav 27, 1162–1172 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03853-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03853-9

Keywords

Navigation