Abstract
PrEP is an HIV prevention option that could benefit substance-involved women, a high-risk population with low PrEP uptake. Little is known about their interest in PrEP. This qualitative study used in-depth interviews to examine PrEP willingness, barriers, and facilitators among 16 women in outpatient psychosocial substance use treatment, methadone, and/or harm reduction/syringe programs in NYC. All expressed willingness to use PrEP, but only during periods of perceived risk. Women perceived themselves to be at high risk for HIV when engaging in active substance use and/or transactional sex. They perceived themselves to be at low risk and therefore unmotivated to take PrEP when abstinent from these activities. Paradoxically, a major barrier to using PrEP was anticipated interference from substance use and transactional sex, the very same activities that create a perception of risk. Facilitators of PrEP use included perceptions of it as effortless (as opposed to barrier methods during sex) and effective, safe, and accessible. Other barriers included fear of stigma and doubts about adhering daily. Recommendations for best PrEP implementation practices for substance-involved women included tailored and venue-specific PrEP information and messaging, PrEP discussion with trusted medical providers, and on-site PrEP prescription in substance use treatment and harm reduction programs.
Resumen
PrEP es una opción de prevención de VIH que puede beneficiar a las mujeres que consumen sustancias, una población de alto riesgo con baja aceptación de la PrEP, pero poco se sabe de su interés en la PrEP. Este estudio cualitativo utilizó entrevistas para examinar el interés en tomar la PrEP y las barreras y los facilitadores del uso de la PrEP entre 16 mujeres en tratamiento por el uso de sustancias en clínicas ambulatorias, clínicas metadonas, o programas de reducción de daños en la ciudad de Nueva York, Estados Unidos. Todas las participantes expresaron su disposición a usar PrEP, pero solo durante períodos de riesgo percibido (por ejemplo, tiempos de uso de sustancias activas y/o sexo transaccional). Paradójicamente, una barrera importante para el uso de PrEP fue la interferencia anticipada por el uso de sustancias y el sexo transaccional, las mismas actividades que crean una percepción de riesgo. Los facilitadores incluyeron percepciones de PrEP como sin esfuerzo durante las relaciones sexuales, efectiva, segura, y accesible. Otras barreras incluyeron el miedo del estigma y dudas sobre la adherencia diaria. Las recomendaciones para las mejores prácticas de implementar la PrEP para mujeres que consumen sustancias incluyeron información y mensajes de PrEP personalizados y específicos del lugar, discusión de PrEP con proveedores médicos confiables, y prescripción de PrEP en el sitio en programas de tratamiento y reducción de daños por uso de sustancias.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data and material can be made available on request as permitted by Institutional Review Board approval.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Spinner CD, Boesecke C, Zink A, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): A review of current knowledge of oral systemic HIV PrEP in humans. Infection. 2016;44(2):151–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0850-2.
Siegler AJ, Mouhanna F, Giler RM, et al. The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis-to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(12):841–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.005.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report,. 2019, vol. 32. 2021. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.
NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. HIV among women in New York City,. 2018. 2019. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/dires/hiv-aids-in-women.pdf.
Yun K, Xu J-J, Zhang J, et al. Female and younger subjects have lower adherence in PrEP trials: a meta-analysis with implications for the uptake of PrEP service to prevent HIV. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;94(3):163–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053217.
Zhang C, McMahon J, Simmons J, Brown LL, Nash R, Liu Y. Suboptimal HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness and willingness to use among women who use drugs in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(10):2641–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02573-x.
Auerbach JD, Smith LR. Theoretical foundations of research focused on HIV prevention among substance-involved women: A review of observational and intervention studies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Supplement 2):146–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000658.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV diagnoses.. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/group/gender/women/cdc-hiv-women.pdf.
El-Bassel N, Terlikbaeva A, Pinkham S. HIV and women who use drugs: Double neglect, double risk. Lancet. 2010;376(9738):312–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61026-4.
Cohen LR, Tross S, Pavlicova M, Hu M-C, Campbell AN, Nunes EV. Substance use, childhood sexual abuse, and sexual risk behavior among women in methadone treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35(5):305–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990903060127.
Patton R, Blow FC, Bohnert ASB, Bonar EE, Barry KL, Walton MA. Prevalence and correlates of transactional sex among an urban emergency department sample: Exploring substance use and HIV risk. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(2):625–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035417.
Hutton HE, Lesko CR, Li X, et al. Alcohol use patterns and subsequent sexual behaviors among women, men who have sex with men and men who have sex with women engaged in routine HIV care in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(6):1634–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2337-5.
Wechsberg WM, Deren S, Myers B, et al. Gender-specific HIV prevention interventions for women who use alcohol and other drugs: The evolution of the science and future directions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Suppl 2):128-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000627.
Stoner MCD, Haley DF, Golin CE, Adimora AA, Pettifor A. The relationship between economic deprivation, housing instability and transactional sex among women in North Carolina (HPTN 064). AIDS Behav. 2019;23(11):2946–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02611-8.
El-Bassel N, Strathdee SA. Women who use or inject drugs: An action agenda for women-specific, multilevel, and combination HIV prevention and research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(Suppl 2):182-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000628.
Felsher M, Ziegler E, Smith LR, et al. An exploration of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation among women who inject drugs. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(6):2205–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01684-0.
Walters SM, Reilly KH, Neaigus A, Braunstein S. Awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women who inject drugs in NYC: The importance of networks and syringe exchange programs for HIV prevention. Harm Reduct J 2017;14(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0166-x.
MacAfee LK, Harfmann RF, Cannon LM, et al. Substance use treatment patient and provider perspectives on accessing sexual and reproductive health services: Barriers, facilitators, and the need for integration of care. Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(1):95–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1656255.
Benning L, Mantsios A, Kerrigan D, et al. Examining adherence barriers among women with HIV to tailor outreach for long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01011-8.
Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications; 2014.
Golden SD, Earp JAL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: Twenty years of Health Education & Behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39:364–72.
Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. Health Behav Health Educ. 2008;4:465–85.
Becker MH. The health belief model and sick role behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):409–19.
Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):354–86.
Cousin G. New approaches to qualitative research. Routledge; 2010.
Hirschhorn LR, Brown RN, Friedman EE, et al. Black cisgender women’s PrEP knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and experience in Chicago. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;84(5):497–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000002377.
Calabrese SK. Understanding, contextualizing, and addressing PrEP stigma to enhance PrEP implementation. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(6):579–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00533-y.
Gwadz M, Leonard NR, Honig S, Freeman R, Kutnick A, Ritchie AS. Doing battle with “the monster”: How high-risk heterosexuals experience and successfully manage HIV stigma as a barrier to HIV testing. Int J Equity Health 2018;17(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0761-9.
Jaiswal J, Dunlap K, Griffin M, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, acceptability and potential stigma among medical and non-medical clinic staff in methadone treatment settings in northern New Jersey: The key role of non-medical staff in enhancing HIV prevention. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;129(108371):108371.
Bradley E, Forsberg K, Betts JE, et al. Factors affecting pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation for women in the United States: A systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(9):1272–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7353.
Jo Y, Bartholomew TS, Doblecki-Lewis S, et al. Interest in linkage to PrEP among people who inject drugs accessing syringe services; Miami, Florida. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231424.
Brooks RA, Landrian A, Lazalde G, Galvan FH, Liu H, Chen Y-T. Predictors of awareness, accessibility and acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among English- and Spanish-speaking Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles, California. J Immigr Minor Health. 2020;22(4):708–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00955-w.
Shah HS, Grieb SMD, Flores-Miller A, et al. Sólo Se Vive Una Vez: Evaluation of a social marketing campaign promoting HIV screening and prevention for immigrant Latinxs. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(9):3024–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03165-4.
Walters SM, Frank D, Van Ham B, Jaiswal J, Muncan B, Earnshaw V, Ompad DC. PrEP care continuum engagement among persons who inject drugs: Rural and urban differences in stigma and social infrastructure. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(4).
Funding
This work was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Center Grant (P30-MH43520; Remien, PI). Dr. Ertl was also supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Training Grant (T32-MH19139; Sandfort, PI) as well as a training grant funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R25DA050687-01A1; Valdez, PI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: ST, SH; Data collection: ST, SH, HB, ET; Data coding and analysis: ST, SH, ET, HB, AS, ME; Manuscript preparation, ST, SH, AS, ME. Manuscript review and editing: ET, HB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest/Competing interests
We the authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Ethics Approval
All study procedures and forms were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of New York State Psychiatric Institute at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
Consent to Participate
All participants received full informed consent prior to their voluntary participation.
Consent for Publication
All authors have contributed to this work and agree to submit it for publication in its current form. No data or images are reproduced in this submission without proper permissions.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tross, S., Spector, A.Y., Ertl, M.M. et al. A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators of PrEP Uptake Among Women in Substance Use Treatment and Syringe Service Programs. AIDS Behav 27, 1162–1172 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03853-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03853-9