Abstract
We conducted a 6-month acceptability study of diaphragms as a potential HIV/STI prevention method among Zimbabwean women. We examined partner involvement in diaphragm use, and importance of discreet use (use without partner awareness). Of the 181 women who completed the study, 45% said discreet use was “very or extremely important” and in multivariate logistic regression, women were more likely to value discretion if their partners: had other partners; drank alcohol; or were believed to prefer condoms to diaphragms. Qualitative data confirmed these findings. Both women and their partners reported that diaphragms can be used discreetly and saw this as advantageous, for both sexual pleasure and female control. However, many were concerned that use without partner approval could lead to marital problems. Discreet use should be considered in development of barrier methods and in diaphragm promotion, if proven effective against HIV/STI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R. E. (2004). Diaphragm fitting. American Family Physician, 69(1), 97–100.
Bentley, M. E., Fullem, A. M., Tolley, E. E., Kelly, C. W., Jogelkar, N., Srirak, N., Mwafulirwa, L., Khumalo-Sakutukwa, G., & Celentano, D. D. (2004). Acceptability of a microbicide among women and their partners in a 4-country phase I trial. American Journal of Public Health, 94(7), 1159–1164.
Bounds, W., Guillebaud, J., Dominik, R., & Dalberth, B. T. (1995). The diaphragm with and without spermicide. A randomized, comparative efficacy trial. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 40(11), 764–774.
Buck, J., Kang, M., van der Straten, A., Khumalo-Sakutukwa, G., Posner, S., & Padian, N. (2005). Barrier method preferences and perceptions among Zimbabwean women and their partners. AIDS and Behavior, 9(4) 415–422.
Bulut, A., Ortayli, N., Ringheim, K., Cottingham, J., Farley, T. M., Peregoudov, A., Joanis, C., Palmore, S., Brady, M., Diaz, J., Ojeda, G., & Ramos, R. (2001). Assessing the acceptability, service delivery requirements, and use-effectiveness of the diaphragm in Colombia, Philippines, and Turkey. Contraception, 63(5), 267–275.
El-Sadr, W. M., Mayer, K. H., Maslankowski, L., Hoesley, C., Justman, J., Gai, F., Mauck, C., Absalon, J., Morrow, K., Masse, B., Soto-Torres, L., & Kwiecien, A. (2006). Safety and acceptability of cellulose sulfate as a vaginal microbicide in HIV-infected women. AIDS, 20(8), 1109–1116.
Elias, C., & Coggins, C. (2001). Acceptability research on female-controlled barrier methods to prevent heterosexual transmission of HIV: Where have we been? Where are we going? Journal of Women’s Health and Gender Based Medicine, 10(2), 163–173.
Ferreira, A. E., Araujo, M. J., Regina, C. H., Diniz, S. G., & Faundes, A. (1993). Effectiveness of the diaphragm, used continuously, without spermicide. Contraception, V48(N1), 29–35.
Gollub, E. L. (2000). The female condom: Tool for women’s empowerment. American Journal of Public Health, 90(9), 1377–1381.
Green, G., Pool, R., Harrison, S., Hart, G. J., Wilkinson, J., Nyanzi, S., & Whitworth, J. A. (2001). Female control of sexuality: Illusion or reality? Use of vaginal products in south west Uganda. Social Science and Medicine, 52(4), 585–598.
Hart, G. J., Pool, R., Green, G., Harrison, S., Nyanzi, S., & Whitworth, J. A. (1999). Women’s attitudes to condoms and female-controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. AIDS Care, 11(6), 687–698.
Hatcher, R. A., Trussell, J., Stewart, F., Stewart, G. K., Kowal, D., Guest, F., Cates, W., & Policar, M. S. (1994). The diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, cervical cap and female condom. In Contraceptive technology (16th revised edition ed., pp. 191–222). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Heise, L. L. (1997). Beyond acceptability: Reorienting research on contraceptive choice. In Beyond acceptability: users’ perspectives on contraception, [compiled by] World Health Organization [WHO], Reproductive Health Matters (pp. 6–14). London, England, Reproductive Health Matters.
Mantell, J. E., Dworkin, S. L., Exner, T. M., Hoffman, S., Smit, J. A., & Susser, I. (2006). The promises and limitations of female-initiated methods of HIV/STI protection. Social Science and Medicine, 63(8), 1998–2009.
Mason, T. H., Foster, S. E., Finlinson, H. A., Morrow, K. M., Rosen, R., Vining, S., Joanis, C. L., Hammett, T. M., & Seage, G. R. 3rd. (2003). Perspectives related to the potential use of vaginal microbicides among drug-involved women: focus groups in three cities in the United States and Puerto Rico. AIDS and Behavior, 7(4), 339–351.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.
Minnis, A. M., & Padian, N. S. (2005). Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81(3), 193–200.
Moench, T., Chipato, T., & Padian, N. (2001). Preventing disease by protecting the cervix: The unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS, 15(13), 1595–1602.
Morrow, K., Rosen, R., Richter, L., Emans, A., Forbes, A., Day, J., Morar, N., Maslankowski, L., Profy, A. T., Kelly, C., Abdool Karim, S. S., & Mayer, K. H. (2003). The acceptability of an investigational vaginal microbicide, PRO 2000 Gel, among women in a phase I clinical trial. Journal of Women’s Health, 12(7), 655–666.
Pool, R., Hart, G., Green, G., Harrison, S., Nyanzi, S., & Whitworth, J. (2000a). Men’s attitudes to condoms and female controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. Culture Health and Sexuality, 2(2), 197–211.
Pool, R., Whitworth, J. A., Green, G., Mbonye, A. K., Harrison, S., Wilkinson, J., & Hart, G. J. (2000b). An acceptability study of female-controlled methods of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 11(3), 162–167.
Ray, S., van de Wijgert, J., Mason, P., Ndowa, F., & Maposhere, C. (2001). Constraints faced by sex workers in use of female and male condoms for safer sex in urban Zimbabwe. Journal of Urban Health, 78(4), 581–592.
Severy, L. J., & Spieler, J. (2000). New methods of family planning: Implications for intimate Behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 37(3), 258–265.
Stein, Z. A. (1995). More on women and the prevention of HIV infection [Editorial]. American Journal of Public Health, 85(11), 1485–1488.
Stewart, F. (1998). Chapter 18: Vaginal barriers: The diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, cervical cap and female condom. In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. Stewart, J. C. Willard, G. K. Stewart, F. Guest & D. Kowal (Eds.), Contraceptive technology (pp. Chapter 18): Arcent Media Inc.
Trussell, J., Strickler, J., & Vaughan, B. (1993). Contraceptive efficacy of the diaphragm, the sponge and the cervical cap. Family Planning Perspectives, 25(3), 100–105, 135.
UNAIDS (2000). Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS estimates and data.
UNAIDS (2005). Evidence for HIV Decline in Zimbabwe.
van der Straten, A., Kang, M. S., Posner, S. F., Kamba, M., Chipato, T., & Padian, N. S. (2005). Predictors of diaphragm use as a potential sexually transmitted disease/HIV prevention method in Zimbabwe. Sexually Transmitted Disease, 32(1), 64–71.
WHO/CONRAD (2001). Technical consultation on nonoxynol-9 (summary report). Geneva: WHO.
Woodsong, C. (2004). Covert use of topical microbicides: Implications for acceptability and use. International Family Planning Perspectives, 30(2), 94–98.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Contraceptive Research and Development (CONRAD) Program (contract # CSA-99-269). We would like to gratefully acknowledge the participants without whom this study would not have been possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, MS., Buck, J., Padian, N. et al. The Importance of Discreet Use of the Diaphragm to Zimbabwean Women and their Partners. AIDS Behav 11, 443–451 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9190-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9190-7