Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: educational and science-related outcomes

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomedical preparatory programs (pipeline programs) have been developed at colleges and universities to better prepare youth for entering science- and health-related careers, but outcomes of such programs have seldom been rigorously evaluated. We conducted a matched cohort study to evaluate the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program’s Summer Residential Program (SRP), a 25-year-old university-based biomedical pipeline program that reaches out to low-income and underrepresented ethnic minority high school students. Five annual surveys were used to assess educational outcomes and science-related experience among 96 SRP participants and a comparison group of 192 youth who applied but were not selected to participate in the SRP, using ~2:1 matching on sociodemographic and academic background to control for potential confounders. SRP participants were more likely than the comparison group to enter college (100.0 vs. 84.4 %, p = 0.002), and both of these matriculation rates were more than double the statewide average (40.8 %). In most areas of science-related experience, SRP participants reported significantly more experience (>twofold odds) than the comparison group at 1 year of follow-up, but these differences did not persist after 2–4 years. The comparison group reported substantially more participation in science or college preparatory programs, more academic role models, and less personal adversity than SRP participants, which likely influenced these findings toward the null hypothesis. SRP applicants, irrespective of whether selected for participation, had significantly better educational outcomes than population averages. Short-term science-related experience was better among SRP participants, although longer-term outcomes were similar, most likely due to college and science-related opportunities among the comparison group. We discuss implications for future evaluations of other biomedical pipeline programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2012). Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities. Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx.

  • Beck, P., Githens, J. H., Clinkscales, D., Yamamoto, D., Riley, C. M., & Ward, H. P. (1978). Recruitment and retention program for minority and disadvantaged students. Journal of Medical Education, 53(8), 651–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bediako, M. R., McDermott, B. A., Bleich, M. E., & Colliver, J. A. (1996). Ventures in education: A pipeline to medical education for minority and economically disadvantaged students. Academic Medicine, 71(2), 190–192.

  • Butler, W. T., Thomson, W. A., Morrissey, C. T., Miller, L. M., & Smith, Q. W. (1991). Baylor’s program to attract minority students and others to science and medicine. Academic Medicine, 66(6), 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education (CDE) (2009). College-going rates and student migration.

  • Campbell, P. B., Wahl, E., Slater, M., Her, E., Moeller, B., Ba, H., & Light, D. (1998). Paths to success: An evaluation of the gateway to higher education program. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 297–308.

  • Cregler, L. L. (1993). Enrichment programs to create a pipeline to biomedical science careers. Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians, 4(4), 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, P., & McKnight, B. (2004). Analysis of matched cohort data. The Stata Journal, 4(3), 274–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., & Davidson, C. P. (1982). The Med-COR study: Preparing high school students for health careers. Journal of Medical Education, 57(7), 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, D. A., Hertle, M. D., Conley, J. G., Washington, L. B., & Bruns, P. J. (2004). Assessing precollege science education outreach initiatives: A funder’s perspective. Cell Biology Education, 3(3), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F., & Flowers, J. C. (1990). New York’s statewide approach to increase the number of minority applicants to medical school. Academic Medicine, 65(11), 671–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. C. (1975). An experiment in health careers recruitment: A summer program at Indiana University. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 46(12), 1284–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendall, S. B., Simoyi, P., Chester, A. L., & Rye, J. A. (2000). The health sciences and technology academy: Utilizing pre-college enrichment programming to minimize post-secondary education barriers for underserved youth. Academic Medicine, 75(10 Suppl), S121–S123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2011). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2009, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) at Grades 4, 8, and 12 (NCES 2011-451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickens, H. W., Ready, T. P., & Petersdorf, R. G. (1994). Project 3000 by 2000. Racial and ethnic diversity in U.S. medical schools. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(7), 472–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, B. U., Mahan, J. M., & Perry, R. R. (1981). Minority recruitment to the health professions: A matched comparison 6-year follow-up. Journal of Medical Education, 56, 742–747.

  • Rohrbaugh, M. C., & Corces, V. G. (2011). Opening pathways for underrepresented high school students to biomedical research careers: The Emory University RISE program. Genetics, 189(4), 1135–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J. T., Martin, T. M., Farris, K. H., Rosenbaum, R. B., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2007). Can medical schools teach high school students to be scientists? FASEB J, 21, 1954–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikes, S. S., & Schwartz-Bloom, R. D. (2009). LEAP! Launch into Education About Pharmacology: Transforming students into scientists. Molecular Interventions, 9(5), 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, S. C., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S., & Loike, J. D. (2009). Teachers’ participation in research programs improves their students’ achievement in science. Science, 326(5951), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M., & Iler, E. (1991). A program to prepare minority students for careers in medicine, science, and other high-level professions. Academic Medicine, 66(4), 220–225.

  • StataCorp. (2013). Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W. A., Denk, J. P., Miller, L. M., Ochoa-Shargey, B., & Jibaja-Rusth, M. (1992). Results of a summer academy to increase minority student access to allied health and other health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 21(2), 79–93.

  • Thurmond, V. B., & Cregler, L. L. (1994). Career choices of minority high school student research apprentices at a health science center. Academic Medicine, 69(6), 507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tough, P. (2014). Who gets to graduate? The New York Times Magazine, May 15, 2014.

  • U.S. Department of Education (USDE) (2011). Statement by U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan on the Release of the NAEP Science Report Card. Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (2009). Pipeline programs to improve racial and ethnic diversity in the health professions: An inventory of federal programs, assessment of evaluation approaches, and critical review of the research literature. Washington, D.C.

  • Winkleby, M. A. (2007). The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: 18 years of a biomedical program for low-income high school students. Academic Medicine, 82(2), 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkleby, M., & Ned, J. (2010). Promoting science education. JAMA, 303(10), 983–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkleby, M. A., Ned, J., Ahn, D., Koehler, A., Fagliano, K., & Crump, C. (2014). A controlled evaluation of a high school biomedical pipeline program: Design and methods. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 138–144.

  • Winkleby, M. A., Ned, J., Ahn, D., Koehler, A. R., & Kennedy, J. (2009). Increasing diversity in science and health professions: A 21-year longitudinal study documenting college and career success. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, M. (2001). Participation in advanced mathematics: Do expectation and influence of students, peers, teachers, and parents matter? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 132–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by grant R25 OD011139 from the Science Educational Partnership Award (SEPA) from the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, a component of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Nell Curran, M.P.H., and Dale Lemmerick for leadership within the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program (SMYSP), Diana Rivera, Alana Koehler and Kathleen Fagliano for annual evaluation of students, members of the SMYSP advisory board, and the many foundations and individual donors that have helped sustain the program over the years. In-kind resources were provided by Stanford University, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 211 Quarry Road, Suite 405, MC 5985, Palo Alto, CA, 94304-1426, USA

    Casey Crump

  2. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Medical School Office Building, 251 Campus Drive, MC 5411, Stanford, CA, 94305-5411, USA

    Judith Ned & Marilyn A. Winkleby

Authors
  1. Casey Crump
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Judith Ned
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marilyn A. Winkleby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey Crump.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 40 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crump, C., Ned, J. & Winkleby, M.A. The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: educational and science-related outcomes. Adv in Health Sci Educ 20, 457–466 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9540-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9540-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation