Abstract
Clinicians’ purposeful improvement of practice is vital to maintaining excellence in patient care. This activity is understood as a core competency of adaptive expertise. As part of a broader program of research exploring adaptive expertise in healthcare, this study explored purposeful improvement in paediatric minimally invasive surgery. A cognitive ethnography was conducted, with the aim of identifying and elaborating distributed cognitive processes that occur when an individual enacts purposeful improvements in a clinical context. A saturation sample of data from weekly pre-operative meetings, 13 observed minimally invasive procedures and 12 semi-structured interviews was collected over 6 months. A concurrent analysis of field notes and transcribed interviews was done inductively to uncover emergent themes. An audit trail was maintained throughout the research. We analyzed the interview and observation data with particular attention to the ways in which the activity of purposeful improvement is distributed socially (e.g. patient families, health care team) and materially (e.g. procedure, patient position, instruments, OR equipment) as well as over time (i.e. before, during and after). These results made visible the distributed nature of purposeful improvement, building on our understanding of this important adaptive expert activity in clinical settings and suggesting implications for more effective training of future adaptive experts. In particular, our results inform how purposeful improvement can occur during daily work and highlight two related forms of integration that occur during this activity: integration of individual competencies and integration of individuals and their social and material context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2000). Putting ethnography to work: The case for a cognitive ethnography of design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53(1), 147–168.
Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281–300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.
Durning, S. J., Artino, A. R., Boulet, J. R., Dorrance, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Schuwirth, L. (2012). The impact of selected contextual factors on experts’ clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?). Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 65–79.
Fenwick, Tara. (2003). Innovation: Examining workplace learning in new enterprises. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(3), 123–132.
Fenwick, Tara. (2014). Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: Attuning to what matters. Medical Education, 48(1), 44–52. doi:10.1111/medu.12295.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gilchrist, V. J., & Williams, R. L. (1999). Key informant interviews. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Hammersley, Martyn, & Atkinson, Paul. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hammersly, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan. New York: W.H. freeman.
Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19(3), 265–288.
Hutchins, E. (2003). Cognitive ethnography. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the cognitive science society, Pts 1 and 2 (pp. 18–18).
Kelle, U. (1995). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc.
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 14(4), 595–621. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.
Moore, K., Lorenzo, A. J., Turner, S., Bagli, D. J., Pippi Salle, J. L., & Farhat, W. A. (2012). Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 24, 1–5.
Mylopoulos, M., Lohfeld, L., Norman, G. R., Dhaliwal, G., & Eva, K. W. (2012). Renowned physicians’ perceptions of expert diagnostic practice. Academic Medicine, 87(10), 1413–1417.
Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, Glenn. (2007). Cognitive metaphors of expertise and knowledge: Prospects and limitations for medical education. Medical Education, 41(12), 1159–1165. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02912.x.
Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, G. (2009). How student models of expertise and innovation impact the development of adaptive expertise in medicine. Medical Education, 43(2), 127–132.
Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, G. (2011). Putting the expert together again. Medical Education, 45(9), 920–926.
Mylopoulos, M., Regehr, G., & Ginsburg, S. (2011). Exploring residents’ perceptions of expertise and expert development. Academic Medicine, 86(10 Suppl), S46–S49.
Mylopoulos, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education, 42, 975–981.
Nardi, B.A. (1992). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Proceedings east–west conference on human–computer interaction (pp. 352–359). St. Petersburg: Russia, August 4–8.
Norman, G. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39(4), 418–427.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Rachlis, M. (2004). Prescription for excellence: How innovation is saving Canada’s healthcare system. Harper Collins Canada.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. United States: Information Age publishing.
Shojania, K. G., & Levinson, W. (2009). Clinicians in quality improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(7), 766–768.
Sklar, D. (2013). Integrating competencies. Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1049–1051.
Turner, R. M, 2nd, Fox, J. A., & Ost, M. C. (2012). Advances in the surgical pediatric urologic armamentarium. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 59(4), 927–941.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ms. Petra Breiner for her hard work and dedication during this project. This research was funded by the University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Dean’s Fund New Staff Grant.
Ethical standard
Ethical approval was granted for this research by the Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mylopoulos, M., Farhat, W. “I can do better”: exploring purposeful improvement in daily clinical work. Adv in Health Sci Educ 20, 371–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9533-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9533-5