Skip to main content
Log in

“I can do better”: exploring purposeful improvement in daily clinical work

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinicians’ purposeful improvement of practice is vital to maintaining excellence in patient care. This activity is understood as a core competency of adaptive expertise. As part of a broader program of research exploring adaptive expertise in healthcare, this study explored purposeful improvement in paediatric minimally invasive surgery. A cognitive ethnography was conducted, with the aim of identifying and elaborating distributed cognitive processes that occur when an individual enacts purposeful improvements in a clinical context. A saturation sample of data from weekly pre-operative meetings, 13 observed minimally invasive procedures and 12 semi-structured interviews was collected over 6 months. A concurrent analysis of field notes and transcribed interviews was done inductively to uncover emergent themes. An audit trail was maintained throughout the research. We analyzed the interview and observation data with particular attention to the ways in which the activity of purposeful improvement is distributed socially (e.g. patient families, health care team) and materially (e.g. procedure, patient position, instruments, OR equipment) as well as over time (i.e. before, during and after). These results made visible the distributed nature of purposeful improvement, building on our understanding of this important adaptive expert activity in clinical settings and suggesting implications for more effective training of future adaptive experts. In particular, our results inform how purposeful improvement can occur during daily work and highlight two related forms of integration that occur during this activity: integration of individual competencies and integration of individuals and their social and material context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2000). Putting ethnography to work: The case for a cognitive ethnography of design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53(1), 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281–300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, S. J., Artino, A. R., Boulet, J. R., Dorrance, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Schuwirth, L. (2012). The impact of selected contextual factors on experts’ clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?). Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, Tara. (2003). Innovation: Examining workplace learning in new enterprises. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(3), 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, Tara. (2014). Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: Attuning to what matters. Medical Education, 48(1), 44–52. doi:10.1111/medu.12295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, V. J., & Williams, R. L. (1999). Key informant interviews. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, Martyn, & Atkinson, Paul. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersly, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan. New York: W.H. freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19(3), 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2003). Cognitive ethnography. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the cognitive science society, Pts 1 and 2 (pp. 18–18).

  • Kelle, U. (1995). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 14(4), 595–621. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K., Lorenzo, A. J., Turner, S., Bagli, D. J., Pippi Salle, J. L., & Farhat, W. A. (2012). Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 24, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., Lohfeld, L., Norman, G. R., Dhaliwal, G., & Eva, K. W. (2012). Renowned physicians’ perceptions of expert diagnostic practice. Academic Medicine, 87(10), 1413–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, Glenn. (2007). Cognitive metaphors of expertise and knowledge: Prospects and limitations for medical education. Medical Education, 41(12), 1159–1165. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02912.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, G. (2009). How student models of expertise and innovation impact the development of adaptive expertise in medicine. Medical Education, 43(2), 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, G. (2011). Putting the expert together again. Medical Education, 45(9), 920–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., Regehr, G., & Ginsburg, S. (2011). Exploring residents’ perceptions of expertise and expert development. Academic Medicine, 86(10 Suppl), S46–S49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education, 42, 975–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B.A. (1992). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Proceedings eastwest conference on humancomputer interaction (pp. 352–359). St. Petersburg: Russia, August 4–8.

  • Norman, G. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39(4), 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlis, M. (2004). Prescription for excellence: How innovation is saving Canada’s healthcare system. Harper Collins Canada.

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. United States: Information Age publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shojania, K. G., & Levinson, W. (2009). Clinicians in quality improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(7), 766–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, D. (2013). Integrating competencies. Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1049–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. M, 2nd, Fox, J. A., & Ost, M. C. (2012). Advances in the surgical pediatric urologic armamentarium. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 59(4), 927–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ms. Petra Breiner for her hard work and dedication during this project. This research was funded by the University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Dean’s Fund New Staff Grant.

Ethical standard

Ethical approval was granted for this research by the Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Mylopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mylopoulos, M., Farhat, W. “I can do better”: exploring purposeful improvement in daily clinical work. Adv in Health Sci Educ 20, 371–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9533-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9533-5

Keywords

Navigation