Skip to main content
Log in

Feedback for General Practitioners in Training: Quality, Styles, and Preferences

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A General Practitioner (GP) is no longer a loner, but a team player in either a group practice or a care centre. This change has led to a concomitant growth in curricular interest in skills essential for successful collaboration and for enhancing critical reflection towards colleagues’ performance. Giving and receiving constructive feedback are examples of these skills. The aim of this study was to gain insight in the style and quality of feedback reports on consultation skills written by GPs-in-Training (GPiTs) and by their GP-trainers. Furthermore, the preferences of the GPiTs concerning feedback style were examined. Results show significant differences between GP-trainers and GPiTs in feedback style and quality. A ranking task indicated that GPiTs have a preference for reports characterised by a large number of reflective remarks. Questionnaire results indicate the added value of the use of peer feedback. Implications for the integration of peer feedback activities in the curriculum of GPiTs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.R. Anderson (1982) ArticleTitleAcquisition of cognitive skill Psychological Review 89 369–406 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Askew C. Lodge (2000) Gifts, ping-pong and loops – Linking feedback and learning S. Askew (Eds) Feedback for Learning Routledge/Falmer London 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In: V.S. Ramachaudran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Vol. 4, pp. 71–81. New York: Academic Press (Reprinted in H. Friedman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mental Health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)

  • P.M. Boendermaker J. Schulinga B. Meyboom-de Jong R.P. Zwierstrac J.C.M. Metz (2000) ArticleTitleWhat are the characteristics of the competent general practitioner trainer? Family Practice 7 IssueID6 547–553 Occurrence Handle10.1093/fampra/17.6.547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Butler P.H. Winne (1995) ArticleTitleFeedback and self regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis Review of Educational Research 65 245–281 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1170684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Calhoun J.D. Ten Haken J.O. Woolliscroft (1990) ArticleTitleMedical students’ development of self- and peer assessment skills: A longitudinal study Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2 25–29 Occurrence Handle10.1080/10401339009539423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBS (2003). Vademecum gezondheidsstatistiek Nederland 2003 [Vademecum health statistics 2003]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport

  • W. Cheng M. Warren (1997) ArticleTitleHaving second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise Studies in Higher Education 22 233–239 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079712331381064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Conway D. Kember A. Sivan M. Wu (1993) ArticleTitlePeer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International 32: 175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Fitts (1964) Perceptual-motor skill learning A.W. Melton (Eds) Categories of Human Learning Academic Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Flavell (1976) Metacognitive aspects of problem solving L.B. Resnick (Eds) The Nature of Intelligence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ 231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameGeneral Medical Council (2001) Good Medical Practice General Medical Council London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P.A. (1991). Practicals in Higher Science Education. Utrecht: Lemma

  • N.E. Lane (1987) Skill Acquisition Rates and Patterns: Issues and Training Implications Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Lane R.P. Gottlieb (2004) ArticleTitleImproving the interviewing and self-assessment skills of medical students: Is it time to readopt videotaping as an educational tool? Ambulatory Pediatrice 4 244–248 Occurrence Handle10.1367/A03-122R1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Lockhart P. Ng (1995) ArticleTitleAnalyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content Language Learning 45 IssueID4 605–655

    Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Mehrens W.J. Popham J.M. Ryan (1998) ArticleTitleHow to prepare students for performance assessments Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 17 IssueID1 18–22 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00617.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.H. Mory (1992) ArticleTitleThe use of informational feedback in instruction: Implications for future research Educational Technology Research and Development 40 5–20 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02296839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.H. Mory (2003) Feedback research revisited D.H. Jonassen (Eds) Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology Macmillan Library Reference New York 745–783

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Neves J.R. Anderson (1981) Knowledge compilation: Mechanisms for the automatization of cognitive skills J.R. Anderson (Eds) Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 57–84

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Norcini (2003) ArticleTitlePeer assessment of competence Medical Education 37 539–543 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01536.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Orsmond S. Merry K. Reiling (1996) ArticleTitleThe importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21 239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Prins D.M.A. Sluijsmans P. Kirschner J.W. Strijbos (2005) ArticleTitleFormative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30 417–444

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ram R. Grol J.J. Rethans B. Schouten C. Vleuten Particlevan der A. Kester (1999) ArticleTitleAssessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: Issues of validity, reliability and feasibility Medical Education 33 447–454 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00348.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Rudy M.C. Fejfar C.H. Griffith SuffixIII J.F. Wilson (2001) ArticleTitleSelf- and peer assessment in a first-year communication and interviewing course Evaluation & the Health Professions 24 436–445 Occurrence Handle10.1177/01632780122035000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluijsmans, D.M.A. (2002). Student Involvement in Assessment. The Training of Peer Assessment Skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen

  • Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel & Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(5): 443–454

  • D.M.A. Sluijsmans F. Dochy G. Moerkerke (1999) ArticleTitleCreating a learning environment by using self- peer- and co-assessment Learning Environments Research 1 293–319 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009932704458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.S. Snoddy (1926) ArticleTitleLearning and stability Journal of Applied Psychology 10 1–36 Occurrence Handle10.1037/h0075814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H.L. (June 1996). Lessons Learned from FIPSE Projects III. University of Wisconsin at Madison. An Ability-Based Assessment program at the Medical School. Project director: Howard L. Stone, Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706. http://www.ed.gov/offices/OPE/FIPSE/LessonsIII/madis.html

  • K. Topping (1998) ArticleTitlePeer assessment between students in colleges and universities Review of Educational Research 68 IssueID3 249–276 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1170598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Pennsylvania (2004). Department of Medicine Internal Medicine Residency Curriculum Academic Year 2004–2005

  • Van den Berg, I. (2003). Peer assessment in universitair onderwijs [Peer assessment in university education]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • J.J.G. Merriënboer ParticleVan (1997) Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training Educational Technology Publications Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • M.V.J. Veenman L. Kerseboom C. Imthorn (2000) ArticleTitleTest anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: Availablity versus production deficiencies Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 13 391–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams E. (1992). Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 17: 45–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frans J. Prins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prins, F.J., Sluijsmans, D.M.A. & Kirschner, P.A. Feedback for General Practitioners in Training: Quality, Styles, and Preferences. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 11, 289–303 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-3250-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-3250-z

Keywords

Navigation