Abstract
The study aims to analyze the agroforestry system and its eco-efficiency, mainly from regulatory mechanisms and partnerships. We chose the stakeholder theory lenses to analyze the complex scenario of the relationship among different social actors. The contexts of Brazilian and Bulgaria agroforestry systems have been selected for our case study research. Twenty-four agroforestry experts/farmers working across 24 organizations and operating in Brazil and Bulgaria have been interviewed through semi-structured interviews. As a result, a comprehensive framework was created, which illustrates the key findings from the research divided into five directions: (i) key social actors in the agroforestry system, (ii) types of partnerships and cooperation between social actors; (iii) regulatory mechanisms for the agroforestry system, (iv) challenges of working with the agroforestry system, and (v) recommendations for future agroforestry entrepreneurs. Our comprehensive framework and findings will further support agroforestry farmers and policymakers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atta-Krah K, Kindt R, Skilton JN, Amaral W (2004) Managing biological and genetic diversity in tropical agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61–62:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028998.32732.65
Bardin L (2016) Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70 Brasil, São Paulo
Botos S, Pancsira J, Lengyel P, Burriel C, Várallyai L, Herdon M (2016) Collaborative working environment and knowledge databank for agroforestry training and education. Int J Sustain Agric Manag Inform 2:222. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2016.10002895
Brasil (2019). Projeto de Lei 6529/2019: Programa de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas Agroflorestais de Base Agroecológica. Available at: https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra;jsessionid=node014bwl6hga17qr34ixxoolmv3l10279.node0?codteor=1848593&filename=PL+6529/2019
Brewerton P, Millward L (2001) Organisational research methods. Sage, California
Burgess PJ, Rosati A (2018) Advances in European agroforestry: results from the AGFORWARD project. Agroforest Syst 92:801–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0261-3
Callo-Concha D, Denich M, Ul Hassan MM et al (2017) Lessons for research, capacity development and policy in agroforestry for development. Agrofor Syst 91:795–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0085-6
Cardoso IM, Guijt I, Franco FS et al (2001) Continual learning for agroforestry system design: university, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agric Syst 69:235–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00028-2
Chavan SB, Keerthika A, Dhyani SK et al (2015) National Agroforestry policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr Sci 108:1826–1834. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v108/i10/1826-1834
Costa MP, Schoeneboom JC, Oliveira SA, Viñas RS, de Medeiros GA (2018) A socio-eco-efficiency analysis of integrated and non-integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems in the Brazilian Cerrado based on LCA. J Clean Prod 171:1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.063
Espada ALV, Sobrinho MV (2019) Logging community-based forests in the amazon: an analysis of external influences, multi-partner governance, and resilience. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060461
Ewert M, Venturieri GA, Steenbock W, Seoane CES (2016) Agroforestry multistrata systems and the Brazilian environmental law: challenges and solutions. Desenvolv. Meio Ambiente 36:95–114
FAO (2016) Climate change, agriculture and food security. FAO, Rome. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/i6030e/i6030e.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2017). The future of food and agriculture—Trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf
Franzel S, Denning GL, Lillesø JPB, Mercado AR (2004) Scaling up the impact of agroforestry: lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia. Agrofor Syst 61–62:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029008.71743.2d
Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business
Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53(1–2):51–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
Götsch E (1992) Natural Succession of Species in Agroforestry and in Soil Recovery. Available at: https://adam.nz/2019/syntropic-resources/
Herder M, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada RM et al (2017) Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agric Ecosyst Environ 241:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005
Herdon M, Burriel C, Tamás J, Várallyai L, Lengyel P, Pancsira J (2014) AgroFE—Collaborative environment and building learning knowledge base for agroforestry trainings. In: World Conference on Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. pp. 1–8. http://journals.sfu.ca/cigrp/index.php/Proc/article/view/154
IBGE (2018) Censo agropecuário 2017: resultados preliminares. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geográfica e Estatística (IBGE). Available at: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/3093/agro_2017_resultados_preliminares.pdf
Joyce A, Paquin RL (2016) The triple layered business model canvas: a tool to design more sustainable business models. J. Clean. Prod. 135:1474–1486.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
Kachova V, Hinkov G, Popov E, Trichkov L, Mosquera-Losada R (2018) Agroforestry in Bulgaria: history, presence status and prospects. Agrofor Syst 92:655–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0029-6
Keeley KO, Wolz KJ, Adams KI et al (2019) Multi-party agroforestry: emergent approaches to trees and tenure on farms in the Midwest USA. Sustain 11:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082449
Lindgreen A, Maon F, Vanhamme J, Florencio B, Vallaster C, Strong C (2018) Engaging with stakeholders a relational perspective on responsible business, 1st edn. Routledge, England
Marinova V (2017) Main characteristics and perspectives for the development of ideal forms of agriforestry in Bulgaria. New Knowl J Sci 6:45–52
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Montes O, Uribe M, Castro R et al (2020) Policy forum: proposal of a Mexican precision agroforestry policy. For Policy Econ 119:102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102292
Negash M, Kanninen M (2015) Modeling biomass and soil carbon sequestration of indigenous agroforestry systems using CO2FIX approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 203:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.004
Pasini FS (2017) A Agricultura Sintrópica de Ernst Götsch: história, fundamentos e seu nicho no universo da Agricultura Sustentável. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Conservação. Available at:http://ppgciac.macae.ufrj.br/images/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%B5es/FELIPE_DOS_SANTOS_PASINI_ok.pdf
Pretty J (2008) Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363(1491):447–465. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
Rahman SA, Jacobsen JB, Healey JR et al (2017) Finding alternatives to swidden agriculture: does agroforestry improve livelihood options and reduce pressure on existing forest? Agrofor Syst 91:185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9912-4
Reppin S, Kuyah S, de Neergaard A et al (2020) Contribution of agroforestry to climate change mitigation and livelihoods in Western Kenya. Agrofor Syst 94:203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00383-7
Sachs I (2002) Caminhos para o desenvolvimento sustenta´vel, 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond
Soler R, Peri PL, Bahamonde H et al (2018) Assessing Knowledge production for agrosilvopastoral systems in South America. Rangel Ecol Manag 71:637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.12.006
Stancheva J, Bencheva S, Petkova K, Piralkov V (2007) Possibilities for agroforestry development in Bulgaria: outlooks and limitations. Ecol Eng 29:382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.013
Steurer R (2013) Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. Policy Sci 46:387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9177-y
Strauss A (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tantalo C, Priem RL (2016) Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strateg Manag J 37(2):314–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337
Trichkov L, Kachova V (2016) Necessity, opportunities and priorities for development of agroforestry in Bulgaria. For Ideas 22:3–15
Velten S, Leventon J, Jager N, Newig J (2015) What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability 7(6):7833–7865
Yin RK (2014) Case study research design and methods, 5th edn. Sage, California
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our gratitude to all our respondents that agreed to participate in our study and for the information, time, and collaboration provided. We are very grateful for the constructive comments and suggestions of the anonymous reviewers.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macke, J., Bozhikin, I. & Sarate, J.A.R. Feeding a growing population without deforestation: agroforestry system partnerships and mechanisms. Agroforest Syst 95, 687–706 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00621-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00621-x