Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Agroforestry strategies to sequester carbon in temperate North America

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on carbon (C) sequestration potential of agroforestry practices (AP) is needed to develop economically beneficial and ecologically and environmentally sustainable agriculture management plans. The synthesis will provide a review of C sequestration opportunities for AP in temperate North America and the estimated C sequestration potential in the US. We estimated carbon sequestration potential for silvopasture, alley cropping, and windbreaks in the US as 464, 52.4, and 8.6 Tg C yr−1, respectively. Riparian buffers could sequester an additional 4.7 Tg C yr−1 while protecting water quality. Thus, we estimate the potential for C sequestration under various AP in the US to be 530 Tg yr−1. The C sequestered by AP could help offset current US emission rate of 1,600 Tg C yr−1 from burning fossil fuel (coal, oil, and gas) by 33 %. Several assumptions about the area under different AP in the US were used to estimate C sequestration potential: 76 million ha under silvopasture (25 million ha or 10 % of pasture land and 51 million ha of grazed forests), 15.4 million ha (10 % of total cropland) under alley cropping, and 1.69 million ha under riparian buffers. Despite data limitation and uncertainty of land area, these estimates indicate the important role agroforestry could play as a promising CO2 mitigation strategy in the US and temperate North America. The analysis also emphasizes the need for long-term regional C sequestration research for all AP, standardized protocols for C quantification and monitoring, inventory of AP, models to understand long-term C sequestration, and site-specific agroforestry design criteria to optimize C sequestration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailian E, Naiman RJ (2005) Abundance and production of dominant riparian trees in the lowland floodplain of the Queets River, Washington. Ecosystems 8:841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bambrick AD, Whalen JK, Bradley RL, Cogliastro A, Gordon AM, Olivier A, Thevathasan NV (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 79:343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs K, Weaver T (1994) Changes in vegetation and nutrient pools during riparian succession. Wetlands 14:98–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Wardle TD, Bratton GF (1992) Opportunities to increase tree planting in shelterbelts and the potential impacts on carbon storage and conservation. In: Sampson RN, Hair D (eds) Forest and Global Change, vol 1. Opportunities for increasing forest cover. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC, pp 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Tyndall J, Sudmeyer RA (2009) Windbreak practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agron, Madison, pp 75–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfapietra C, Gielen B, Karnosky D, Ceulemans R, Mugnozza S (2010) Response and potential of agroforestry crops under global change. Environ Pollut 159:1095–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAST (2004) Climate change and greenhouse gas mitigation: challenges and opportunities for agriculture. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clason TR, Sharrow SH (2000) Silvopastural practices. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WJ, Fisher RF (eds) North American Agroforestry: An integrated science and practice. Am Soc Agronomy, Madison, pp 119–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner WH, Gosselink JG, Parrondo RT (1981) Comparison of vegetation of three Lousiana swamp sites with different flooding regimes. Am J Botany 68:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JP, Wallace D, Larson DR (1997) Value of woody river corridors in levee protection along the Missouri River in 1993. J Am Water Res Assoc 33:481–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers A, Doraiswamy P (2007) Carbon sequestration and land degradation. In: Sivakumar MVK, Ndegwa N (eds) Climate and land degradation. Springer, Berlin, pp 343–358

  • Garrett HE, McGraw RL, Walter WD (2009) Alley cropping practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agronomy, Madison, pp 133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Giese LAB, Aust WM, Kolka RK, Trettin CC (2003) Biomass and carbon pools of disturbed riparian forests. For Ecol Manage 180:493–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA, Garrett HE (2009) Agroforestry nomenclature, concepts, and practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agron, Madison, pp 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Haile SG, Nair PKR, Nair VD (2008) Carbon storage of different soil-size fractions in Florida silvopastoral systems. J Environ Qual 37:1789–1797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haile SG, Nair VD, Nair PKR (2010) Contribution of trees to carbon storage in soils of silvopastoral systems in Florida, USA. Glob Change Biol 16:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harner MJ, Stanfoord JA (2003) Differences in cottonwood growth between a losing and a gaining reach of an alluvial floodplain. Ecology 84:1453–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett PW, Gordon AM, Sibley PK, Buttle JM (2005) Stand carbon stocks and soil carbon and nitrogen storage for riparian and upland foresests of boreal lakes in northeastern Ontario. For Ecol Manage 219:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath LS, Kimble JM, Birdsey RA, Lal R (2003) The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon. In: Heath JM, Linda S, Birdsey RA, Lal R (eds) The potential of US forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effects. CRC Press, pp 385–394

  • Hoover CM, Heath LS (2011) Potential gains in carbon storage on productive forestlands in northeastern USA through stocking management. Ecol Apps. doi:10.1890/10-0046.1

  • Hou Q, Young LJ, Brandle JR, Schoeneberger MM (2011) A spatial model approach for assessing windbreak growth and carbon stock. J Environ Qual 40:842–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA, Hackler JL (2000) Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. 1. The role of agriculture and forestry. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 9:125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007. Synthesis Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2011

  • Jones RH, Lockaby BG, Somers GL (1996) Effects of micro-topography and disturbance on fine root dynamics in wetland forests of low-order stream floodplains. Am Midl Nat 136:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR, Seifert JR, Pope PE (2001) Comparison of minirhizotron and soil core methods for quantifying root biomass in a temperate alley cropping system. Agrofor Syst 52:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiley DK, Schneider RL (2005) Riparian roots through time, space and disturbance. Plant Soil 269:259–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Isenhart TM, Parkin TB, Schultz RC, Loynachan TE (2010) Methane flux in cropland and adjacent riparian buffers with different vegetation covers. J Environ Qual 39:97–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kort J, Turnock R (1999) Carbon reservoir and biomass in Canadian prairie shelterbelts. Agrofor Syst 44:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH (2010) Root length density and carbon content of agroforestry and grass buffers under grazed pasture systems in a Hapludalf. Agrofor Syst 80:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Cole CV (1998) The potential for U.S. crop land to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea

  • Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Cole CV (1999) Managing U.S. cropland to sequester carbon in soils. J Soil Water Conserv 54:374–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JL, Dodson R (1996) Potential carbon sequestration by afforestation of pasture in south-central United States. Agroclimatology 88:381–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Jose S (2003) Soil respiration and microbial biomass in a pecan-cotton alley cropping system in southern USA. Agrofor Syst 58:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R, Leonard R, Sheridan J (1985) Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint source pollution. J Soil Water Conserv 40:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubowski RN, Vesterby M, Bucholtz S, Baez A, Roberts MJ (2006) Major uses of land in the United States, 2002. Econ Inf Bull EIB-14. USDA Economic Research Service. 54 pp

  • Marquez CO, Cambardella CA, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (1999) Assessing soils quality in a riparian buffer by testing organic matter fractions in central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 44:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metting FB, Jacobs GK, Amthor JS, Dahlman R (2002) Terrestrila carbon sequestration potential. Fuel Chem Div Prepr 47:5–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JA, Follett RF, Allen LH, Grosso SD, Derner JD, Dijkstra F, Franzluebbers A, Fry R, Paustian K, Schoeneberger MM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agricultural land of the United States. J Soil Water Conserv 65:6A–13A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H, McClain ME (2005) Structural patterns. In: Naiman RJ et al (eds) Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities. Elsevier, New York, pp 79–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD (2003) Carbon storage in North American agroforestry systems. In: Kimble JM et al (eds) The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 333–346

  • Nair PKR, Gordon AM, Mosquera-Losada MR (2008) Agroforestry. In: Jorgenson SE, Faith BD (eds) Encyclopedia of Ecology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 101–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyakatawa EZ, Mays D, Naka K, Bukenya JO (2011) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in a loblolly pine-goat silvopasture system in the southeast USA. Agrofor Syst. doi:10.1007/s10457-011-9431-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M (2002) Linking carbon inputs to sustainable agriculture in Canadian and Costa Rican agroforestry systems. Dept Land Res Sci Univ of Guelph, Canada, Ph.D. Dissertation 208 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Kass DCL, Schlönvoigt AM (2006a) Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics using stable isotopes in 19- and 10-yr old tropical agroforestry systems. Geoderma 130:356–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Kass DCL, Schlönvoigt AM (2006b) Soil carbon dynamics and residue stabilization in a Costa Rican and southern Canadian alley cropping system. Agroforest Syst 68:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudel BR, Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Anderson SH (2011) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on soil quality parameters for grazed pasture and row-crop systems. Appl Soil Ecol 48:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems. Southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedade MTF, Worbes W, Junk WJ (2001) Geological controls of elemental fluxes in communities of higher plants in Amazonian floodplanes. In: McClain ME et al (eds) The Biogeochemistry of Amazonian Basin. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 209–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Z, Prato T (2001) Physical determinants of economic value of riparian buffers in an agricultural watershed. J Am Water Res Assoc 37:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raeker G, Moser WK, Butler BJ, Fleming J, Gormanson DD, Hansen MH, Kurtz CM, Miles PD, Morris M, Treiman TB (2011) Missouri’s forests 2008. Res Bull NRS-54. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station. 55 pp

  • Rhoades CC, Nissen TM, Kettler JS (1998) Soil nitrogen dynamics in alley cropping and no-till systems on ultisols of Georgia Piedmont, USA. Agrofor Syst 39:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruark G, Schoeneberger M, Nair PK (2003) Agroforestry helping to achieve sustainable forest management. In the role of planted forests in sustainable forest management report and papers of the UNFF intersessional experts meeting, March 25–27, 2003, Wellington, NZ (www.maf.gov.nz/mafnet/unff-planted-forestry-meeting/conference-papers/roles-for-agroforestry.htm), pp 240–253

  • Sanchez PA (2000) Linking climate change research with food security and poverty reduction in the tropics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer TJ, Cambardella CA, Brandle JR (2007) Soil carbon and litter dynamics in a red cedar-scotch pine shelterbelt. Agrofor Syst 71:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger MM (2009) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agrofor Syst 75:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder P (1994) Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 27:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Colletti JP, Simpkins WW, Udawatta RP, Schultz PL (2009) Riparian and upland buffer practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agron, Madison, pp 163–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agrofor Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Brauer D, Clason TR (2009) Silvopastural practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agron, Madison, pp 105–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Martono D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Olge S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O (2007) Agriculture. In B Metz et al (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 497–540

  • Steinbeiss S, Beβler H, Engels C, Temperton VM, Buchmanns N, Roscher C, Kreutziger Y, Baade J, Habekost M, Gleixner G (2008) Plant diversity positively affects short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Glob Clim Biol 14:2937–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (1997) Poplar leaf biomass distribution and nitrogen dynamics in a poplar-barley intercropped system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 37:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the north temperate region: experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 61:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (1999) Fine root dynamics, coarse root biomass, root distribution, and soils respiration in a multispecies riparian buffer in Central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 44:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2001) Soil respiration within riparian buffers and adjacent crop fields. Plant Soil 229:117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Biomass, carbon and nitrogen dynamics of multi-species riparian buffers within an agricultural watershed in Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 57:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Godsey LD (2010) Agroforestry comes of age: putting science into practice. Agrofor Syst 79:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Jose S (2011) Carbon sequestration of agroforestry practices in temperate North America. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry Systems. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 17–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Nygren PO, Garrett HE (2005) Growth of three oak species during establishment in an agroforestry practice for watershed protection. Can J For Res 35:602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Adamson BW, Anderson SH (2008) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Appl Soil Ecol 39:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA ERS (2011) Major land uses. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/MajorLandUses. Accessed 2 August 2012

  • USDA NAC (2000) Working trees for carbon: windbreaks in the US. USDA Forest Service, National Agroforestry Center, and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. 2 pp. Available on (www.unl.edu/nac/brochures/wbcrarbon/wbcarbon.pdf)

  • USDA NASS (2008) Crop production historical records. USDA National Agricultural Statistical Service, Washington DC. http://www.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed 20 July 2012

  • USDA NRCS (2002) Buffers, common-sense conservation. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/feature/buffers/BufrsPub.html#InitiativeBuff_7Anchor. Accessed 15 January 2011

  • USDA NRCS (2007) Riparian forest buffer code 391 Conservation Practice Standard. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

  • USDA NRCS (2009) Summary report: 2007 national resources inventory. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 123 pp. Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/2007/2007_NRI_Summary.pdf

  • USEPA (2006) Representative carbon sequestration rates and saturation periods for key agricultural and forestry practices.US Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/sequestration/rates.html. Accessed 30 June 2012

  • USEPA (2010) Water quality assessment and total maximum daily loads information: national summery of state information. US Environmental Protection Agency. http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control. Accessed 28 May 2010

  • Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranathan NR, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) IPCC special report on land use, land use change, and forestry. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. http://www.rida.no/climate/ipcc/land_use/. Accessed 30 July 2012

  • Welsh DJ (1991) Riparian forest buffers: function and design for protection and enhancement of water resources. NA-PR-07-91. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, PA. 20 pp

  • Young A (1997) Agroforestry for sSoil Management. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 297 pp

  • Zhang P (1999) Nutrient inputs from trees via throughfall, stemflow and litterfall in an intercropping system. M.Sc. Thesis. Dept. Environ. Univ. of Guelph, Guelph 111 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is an improved and updated version of Udawatta and Jose (2011) cited in the references. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jerry Van Sambeek for his thoughtful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 302 ABNR, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Ranjith P. Udawatta

  2. The Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Ranjith P. Udawatta & Shibu Jose

Authors
  1. Ranjith P. Udawatta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shibu Jose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjith P. Udawatta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Udawatta, R.P., Jose, S. Agroforestry strategies to sequester carbon in temperate North America. Agroforest Syst 86, 225–242 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9561-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9561-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation