Skip to main content
Log in

Energetics, Scaling and Sexual Size Dimorphism of Spiders

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders has motivated studies for many years. In many species the male can be very small relative to the female. There are several hypotheses trying to explain this fact, most of them emphasizing the role of energy in determining spider size. The aim of this paper is to review the role of energy in sexual size dimorphism of spiders, even for those spiders that do not necessarily live in high foliage, using physical and allometric principles. Here we propose that the cost of transport or equivalently energy expenditure and the speed are traits under selection pressure in male spiders, favoring those of smaller size to reduce travel costs. The morphology of the spiders responds to these selective forces depending upon the lifestyle of the spiders. Climbing and bridging spiders must overcome the force of gravity. If bridging allows faster dispersal, small males would have a selective advantage by enjoying more mating opportunities. In wandering spiders with low population density and as a consequence few male–male interactions, high speed and low energy expenditure or cost of transport should be favored by natural selection. Pendulum mechanics show the advantages of long legs in spiders and their relationship with high speed, even in climbing and bridging spiders. Thus small size, compensated by long legs should be the expected morphology for a fast and mobile male spider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Aisenberg A, Viera C, Costa FG (2007) Daring females, devoted males, and reversed sexual size dimorphism in the sand-dwelling spider Allocosa brasiliensis (Araneae, Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RMN (2003) Principles of animal locomotion. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewener AA (2003) Animal locomotion. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt Y, Andrade MCB (2007a) Testing the gravity hypothesis of sexual size dimorphism: are small males faster climbers? Funct Ecol 21:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt Y, Andrade MCB (2007b) What is the matter with the gravity hypothesis? Funct Ecol 21:1182–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Marais E, Terblanche JS, Klok CJ, Lighton JRB, Blackburn TM (2007) Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model. Func Ecol 21:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson TE (1989) Sperm deplection in the orb-weaving spider Nephila clavipes (Araneae, Araneidae). J Arachnol 17:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson TE, Goist KC (1979) Cost and benefits of male–male competition in the orb-weaving spider, Nephila clavipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcobado G, Rodriguez-Girones MA, De Mas E, Moya-Laraño J (2010) Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual dimorphism. BMC Evol Biol 10:236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection in spiders and other arachnids. In: Birkhead TR, Moller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, New York, pp 307–339

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA, Fahey BF (1996) Sexual cannibalism, competition, and size dimorphism in the orb-weaving spider Nephila plumipes Latreille (Araneae: Araneoidea). Behav Ecol 7:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA, Schneider JM, Herberstein ME (2000) Female control of paternity in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope keyserlingi. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2439–2443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foelix RF (1996) Biology of spiders. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ (2005) Selection on male size, leg length and condition during mate search in a sexually highly dimorphic orb-weaving spider. Oecologia 142:653–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foellmer MW, Moya-Larraño J (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in spiders: pattern and processes. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 71–81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garland T, Losos JB (1994) Ecological morphology of locomotor performance in squamate reptiles. In: Wainwright PC, Reilly SM (eds) Ecological morphology. Integrative organismal biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 240–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiseling MT (1974) A radical solution to species problem. Syst Zool 23(4):536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossi B, Canals M (2010) Comparison of the morphology of the limbs of juvenile and adult horses (Equus caballus) and their implications on the locomotor biomechanics. J Exp Zool A 313:292–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarson B, Jhonson J (1990) Protandry and moulting to maturity in the spider Pityohyphantes phrygianus. Oikos 59:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther B, Morgado E (1996) Duality in physiological time: Euclidean and fractal. Biol Res 29:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther B, Morgado E (2003) Dimensional analysis revised. Biol Res 36:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Head G (1995) Selection on fecundity and variation in the degree of sexual size dimorphism among spider species (class Araneae). Evolution 49:776–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht T (1997) Physics, 2nd edn. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormiga G, Eberhard WG, Coddington JA (1995) Web-construction behavior in Australian Phonognatha and the phylogeny of nephiline and tetragnathid spiders (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Aust J Zool 43:313–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hormiga G, Scharff N, Coddington JA (2000) The phylogentic basis of sexual size dimorphism in orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Orbiculariae). Syst Biol 49:435–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR (1986) Cohabitation of males and juvenile females: a prevalent mating tactic of spiders. J Nat Hist 20:1193–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasumovic MM, Bruce MJ, Herberstein ME, Andrade MCB (2007) Risky mate search and mate preference in the golden orb-web spider (Nephila plumipes). Behav Ecol 18:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert R, Teissier G (1927) Théorie de la similitude biologique. Ann Physiol (Paris) 3:212–246

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand RS, Morse DH (2000) Factors driving extreme sexual size dimorphism of a sit and wait predator under low density. Biol J Linn Soc 71:643–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighton JRB, Brownell PH, Joos B, Turner RJ (2001) Low metabolic rate in scorpions: implications for population biomass and cannibalism. J Exp Biol 204:607–613

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA (1983) On size and life. Scientific American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Medler S (2002) Comparative trends in shortening velocity and force production in skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol Reg Int Comp Physiol 283:R368–R378

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Laraño J, Halaj J, Wise DH (2002) Climbing to reach females: Romeo should be small. Evolution 56:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Laraño J, Vinkovic D, De Mas E, Corcobado G, Moreno E (2008) Morphological evolution of spiders predicted by pendulum mechanics. PLoS One 3(3):e1841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Laraño J, Vinkovic D, Allard CM, Foellmer MW (2009) Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders. J Evol Biol 22:954–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven JE, Schaarlemann PW (2005) Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass? Biol Lett 1:346–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenter J, Perez-Staples D, Taylor PW (2010a) Functional relations between locomotor performance traits in spider and implications for evolutionary hypotheses. BMC Res Notes 3:306–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenter J, Perez-Staples D, Taylor PW (2010b) The effects of morphology and substrate diameter on climbing and locomotor performance in male spiders. Funct Ecol 24:400–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos M, Irschick DJ, Christenson TE (2004) Overcoming an evolutionary conflict: removal of a reproductive organ greatly increases locomotor performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:4883–4887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss MJ (1989) The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson MH, Robinson B (1976) The ecology and behavior of Nephila maculate: a supplement. Smithson Contrib Zool 218:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos AJ (2007) Evolucao do dimorfismo sexual de tamanho em aranhas. In: Gonzaga MO, Santos AJ, Japyassú HF (eds) Ecologia e Comportamento de Aranhas. Editora Interciencia, Rio de Janeiro, pp 137–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CR, Heglund NC, Maloiy MO (1982) Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. J Exp Biol 97:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Vollrath F (1998) Little evidence for size-selective sexual cannibalism in two species of Nephila (Araneae). Zoology 101:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath F, Parker GA (1992) Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders. Nature 360:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White C, Seymour R (2005) Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism. J Exp Biol 208:1611–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Lafayette Eaton for his useful comments on the manuscript. Funded by FONDECYT 1110058 grant to M.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Canals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grossi, B., Canals, M. Energetics, Scaling and Sexual Size Dimorphism of Spiders. Acta Biotheor 63, 71–81 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-014-9237-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-014-9237-5

Keywords

Navigation