Abstract
The ability of new medical devices and technology to demonstrate safety and effectiveness, and consequently acquire regulatory approval, has been dependent on benchtop, in vitro, and in vivo evidence and experimentation. Regulatory agencies have recently begun accepting computational models and simulations as credible evidence for virtual clinical trials and medical device development. However, it is crucial that any computational model undergo rigorous verification and validation activities to attain credibility for its context of use before it can be accepted for regulatory submission. Several recently published numerical models of the human spine were considered for their implementation of various comparators as a means of model validation. The comparators used in each published model were examined and classified as either an engineering or natural comparator. Further, a method of scoring the comparators was developed based on guidelines from ASME V&V40 and the draft guidance from the US FDA, and used to evaluate the pertinence of each comparator in model validation. Thus, this review article aimed to score the various comparators used to validate numerical models of the spine in order to examine the comparator’s ability to lend credibility towards computational models of the spine for specific contexts of use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alizadeh, M., A. Aurand, G. G. Knapik, J. S. Dufour, E. Mendel, E. Bourekas, and W. S. Marras. An electromyography-assisted biomechanical cervical spine model: model development and validation. Clin. Biomech. 80:105169, 2020.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME V&V40 Assessing the Credibility of Computational Modeling Through Verification and Validation: Application to Medical Devices. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006.
Amiri, S., S. Naserkhaki, and M. Parnianpour. Modeling and validation of a detailed FE viscoelastic lumbar spine model for vehicle occupant dummies. Comput. Biol. Med. 99:191–200, 2018.
Anderson, A. E., B. J. Ellis, and J. A. Weiss. Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 10:171–184, 2007.
ASTM International. Standard Specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. Book Stand. 13(01):6, 2021.
Baumann, A. P., T. Graf, J. H. Peck, A. E. Dmitriev, D. Coughlan, and J. C. Lotz. Assessing the use of finite element analysis for mechanical performance evaluation of intervertebral body fusion devices. JOR Spine. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1137.
Beaucage-Gauvreau, E., W. S. P. Robertson, S. C. E. Brandon, R. Fraser, B. J. C. Freeman, R. B. Graham, D. Thewlis, and C. F. Jones. Validation of an OpenSim full-body model with detailed lumbar spine for estimating lower lumbar spine loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 22:451–464, 2019.
Bruno, A. G., M. L. Bouxsein, and D. E. Anderson. Development and validation of a musculoskeletal model of the fully articulated thoracolumbar spine and rib cage. J. Biomech. Eng. 137:081003, 2015.
Cristofolini, L., and M. Viceconti. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. J. Biomech. 33:279–288, 2000.
Dreischarf, M., T. Zander, A. Shirazi-Adl, C. M. Puttlitz, C. J. Adam, C. S. Chen, V. K. Goel, A. Kiapour, Y. H. Kim, K. M. Labus, J. P. Little, W. M. Park, Y. H. Wang, H. J. Wilke, A. Rohlmann, and H. Schmidt. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. J. Biomech. 47:1757–1766, 2014.
El Bojairami, I., K. El-Monajjed, and M. Driscoll. Development and validation of a timely and representative finite element human spine model for biomechanical simulations. Sci. Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77469-1.
Elfar, J., R. M. G. Menorca, J. D. Reed, and S. Stanbury. Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 22:111–120, 2014.
Erdemir, A., L. Mulugeta, J. P. Ku, A. Drach, M. Horner, T. M. Morrison, G. C. Y. Peng, R. Vadigepalli, W. W. Lytton, and J. G. Myers Jr. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective. J. Transl. Med. 18:369, 2020.
Fagan, M., S. Julian, and A. Mohsen. Finite element analysis in spine research. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 216:281–298, 2002.
Galbusera, F., and F. Niemeyer. Mathematical and finite element modeling. In: Biomechanics of the Spine, edited by F. Galbusera, and H.-J. Wilke. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2018, pp. 239–255.
Jones, A. C., and R. K. Wilcox. Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. Med. Eng. Phys. 30:1287–1304, 2008.
Kettler, A., L. Liakos, B. Haegele, and H. J. Wilke. Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests? Eur. Spine J. 16:2186–2192, 2007.
Mills, M. J., and N. Sarigul-Klijn. Validation of an in vivo medical image-based young human lumbar spine finite element model. J. Biomech. Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042183.
Newell, E., and M. Driscoll. The examination of stress shielding in a finite element lumbar spine inclusive of the thoracolumbar fascia. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 59:1621–1628, 2021.
Raabe, M. E., and A. M. W. Chaudhari. An investigation of jogging biomechanics using the full-body lumbar spine model: model development and validation. J. Biomech. 49:1238–1243, 2016.
Ramo, N. L., S. S. Shetye, F. Streijger, J. H. T. Lee, K. L. Troyer, B. K. Kwon, P. Cripton, and C. M. Puttlitz. Comparison of in vivo and ex vivo viscoelastic behavior of the spinal cord. Acta Biomater. 68:78–89, 2018.
Schwer, L. E. An overview of the ASME V&V-10 guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. In: 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. Espoo, Finland. 2009.
Schwer, L. E. Verification and validation in computational solid mechanics and the ASME Standards Committee. In: WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. Ashurst: WIT Press, 2005, pp. 109–117.
Sharif-Alhoseini, M., M. Khormali, M. Rezaei, M. Safdarian, A. Hajighadery, M. M. Khalatbari, M. Safdarian, S. Meknatkhah, M. Rezvan, M. Chalangari, P. Derakhshan, and V. Rahimi-Movaghar. Animal models of spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 55:714–721, 2017.
Szabo, B. A., and I. Babuska. Introduction. In: Introduction to Finite Element Analysis: Formulation, Verification, and Validation, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2011, pp. 1–15.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Assessing the credibility of computational modeling and simulation in medical device submissions: draft guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. 2021.
Wang, W., D. Wang, F. De Groote, L. Scheys, and I. Jonkers. Implementation of physiological functional spinal units in a rigid-body model of the thoracolumbar spine. J. Biomech. 98:109437, 2020.
Warren, J. M., A. P. Mazzoleni, and L. A. Hey. Development and validation of a computationally efficient finite element model of the human lumbar spine: application to disc degeneration. Int. J. Spine Surg. 14:502–510, 2020.
Weiss, J. A., J. C. Gardiner, B. J. Ellis, T. J. Lujan, and N. S. Phatak. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of ligaments: technical aspects. Med. Eng. Phys. 27:845–861, 2005.
Wilke, H. J., S. T. Krischak, K. H. Wenger, and L. E. Claes. Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data. Eur. Spine J. 6:129–137, 1997.
Xu, M., J. Yang, I. H. Lieberman, and R. Haddas. Lumbar spine finite element model for healthy subjects: development and validation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 20:1–15, 2017.
Funding
Funding was provided by NSERC (Grant No. 172632).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Associate Editor Joel Stitzel oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Stott, B., Afshari, P., Bischoff, J. et al. A Critical Comparison of Comparators Used to Demonstrate Credibility of Physics-Based Numerical Spine Models. Ann Biomed Eng 51, 150–162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03069-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03069-x