Skip to main content
Log in

Impact Mitigation Properties of Women’s Lacrosse Headgear

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, protective headgear has been released for women’s lacrosse despite the fact that contact to the head is illegal. The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the linear and rotational impact attenuation properties of 2 brands of lacrosse headgear at 4 different locations during laboratory pendulum impacts and (2) determine impact dissipation of new and used lacrosse headgear. We measured peak rotational acceleration (PRA; rad/s2) and linear acceleration (PLA; g) at 4 impact locations (side, rear boss non-centric (NC), front boss, and front) in two headgear brands (Cascade LX, Hummingbird). Two headgear service lives (new headgear, used headgear) were included for the second analysis. During the slower speed, there was a significant interaction between impact location and helmet brand (p = 0.002) for PLA. No other findings were significant. While the Hummingbird headgear reduced linear and rotational accelerations of the headform better than the Cascade headgear during slow velocity impacts to the front and front boss locations, it did so due to extreme motion of the helmet upon impact that we believe may compromise protection of the head and face from lacerations and other injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM International. ASTM International Standardizes Headgear for Women’s Lacrosse.

  2. Bowman, T. G., K. M. Breedlove, E. L. Breedlove, T. M. Dodge, and E. A. Nauman. Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets. J. Biomech. 48:3782–3787, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breedlove, K. M., E. L. Breedlove, T. G. Bowman, and E. A. Nauman. Impact attenuation capabilities of football and lacrosse helmets. J. Biomech. 49:2838–2844, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caswell, S. V., A. E. Lincoln, J. L. Almquist, R. E. Dunn, and R. Y. Hinton. Video incident analysis of head injuries in high school girls’ lacrosse. Am. J. Sport Med. 40:756–762, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, J. M., and T. B. Hoshizaki. The ability of men’s lacrosse helmets to reduce the dynamic impact response for different striking techniques in women’s field lacrosse. Am. J. Sport Med. 44:1047–1055, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, J. M., T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. Protective capacity of an ice hockey goaltender helmet for three events associated with concussion. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 20:1299–1311, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, J. M., A. Post, T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. Protective capacity of ice hockey helmets against different impact events. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44:3693–3704, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cortes, N., A. E. Lincoln, G. D. Myer, L. Hepburn, M. Higgins, M. Putukian, and S. V. Caswell. Video analysis verification of head impact events measured by wearable sensors. Am. J. Sport Med. 45:2379–2387, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DiMasi, F. P. Transformation of nine-accelerometer-package (NAP) data for replicating headpart kinematics and dynamic loading. Washington: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fan, X. Statistical significance and effect size: two sides of a coin. J. Educ. Res. 94:275–282, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoshizaki, T. B., A. Post, R. A. Oeur, and S. E. Brien. Current and future concepts in helmet and sports injury prevention. Neurosurgery 75:S136–S148, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Inside Lacrosse. US Lacrosse Issues Statement on Florida’s Latest Mandate for Girls’ Lacrosse. Inside Lacrosse: Baltimore, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karton, C. M., T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. The influence of impactor mass on the dynamic response of the hybrid III headform and brain tissue deformation. In: Mechanism of Concussion in Sports, edited by A. Ashare, and M. Ziejewski. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2014, pp. 23–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelshaw, P. M., T. E. Gould, M. Jesunathadas, N. Cortes, A. Caswell, E. D. Edwards, and S. V. Caswell. Laboratory performance evaluation of pristine and used headgear for girls’ lacrosse. J. Appl. Biomech., In press.

  15. Kerr, Z. Y., A. E. Lincoln, S. V. Caswell, D. A. Klossner, N. Walker, and T. P. Dompier. Epidemiology of National Collegiate Athletic Association women’s lacrosse injuries, 2009–10 through 2014–15. J. Sport Rehabil. 27:118–125, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kieffer, E. E., M. L. Bland, and S. Rowson. Assessing the ability of women’s lacrosse helmets to reduce risk of head injury. Biomed. Sci. Instrum.: RMBS Special Issue 51:340–346, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Le, R. K., S. D. Saunders, K. M. Breedlove, D. A. Bradney, J. M. Lucas, and T. G. Bowman. Differences in the mechanism of head impacts measured between men’s and women’s intercollegiate lacrosse athletes. Orthop. J. Sport Med. 6:2325967118807678, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lincoln, A. E., S. V. Caswell, J. L. Almquist, R. E. Dunn, M. V. Clough, R. W. Dick, and R. Y. Hinton. Effectiveness of the women’s lacrosse protective eyewear mandate in the reduction of eye injuries. Am. J. Sport Med. 40:611–614, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marar, M., N. M. McIlvain, S. K. Fields, and R. D. Comstock. Epidemiology of concussions among United States high school athletes in 20 sports. Am. J. Sport Med. 40:747–755, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, P. G., G. W. Hall, J. R. Crandall, and W. D. Pilkey. Measuring the acceleration of a rigid body. Shock Vib. 5:211–224, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCallum, B. Helmets mandatory for girls lacrosse next year. Florida Today, April 3, 2017.

  22. NOCSAE. Standard linear impactor test method and equipment used in evaluating the performance characteristics of protective headgear and face guards; NOCSAE DOC (ND) 081-04m04, 2006.

  23. NOCSAE. Standard test method and equipment used in evaluating the performance characteristics of protective headgear/equipment; NOCSAE DOC (ND) 001-11m13, 2013.

  24. Pennington, B. As concussion worries rise, girls’ lacrosse turns to headgear. New York Times, 2017.

  25. Rousseau, P., A. Post, and T. Hoshizaki. The effects of impact management materials in ice hockey helmets on head injury criteria. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P: J. Sports Eng. Technol. 223:159–165, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowson, B., S. Rowson, and S. Duma. Hockey STAR: a methodology for assessing the biomechanical performance of hockey helmets. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43:2429–2443, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwarz, A. A case against helmets in lacrosse. New York Times, 2011.

  28. US Lacrosse. Why women’s lacrosse is not played with additional protective equipment.

  29. US Lacrosse. US Lacrosse 2016 Participation Survey. Sparks: US Lacrosse, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walsh, E. S., P. Rousseau, and T. B. Hoshizaki. The influence of impact location and angle on the dynamic impact response of a hybrid III headform. Sports Eng. 13:135–143, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiang, J., C. L. Collins, D. Liu, L. B. McKenzie, and R. D. Comstock. Lacrosse injuries among high school boys and girls in the United States: academic years 2008–2009 through 2011–2012. Am. J. Sport Med. 42:2082–2088, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funded in part by a grant from the Center for Sport Science at US Lacrosse and a Mednick Fellowship from the Virginia Foundation for Independent Colleges. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of US Lacrosse or the Virginia Foundation for Independent Colleges.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas G. Bowman.

Additional information

Associate Editor Joel D Stitzel oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowman, T.G., Breedlove, K.M., Lininger, M.R. et al. Impact Mitigation Properties of Women’s Lacrosse Headgear. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 1491–1498 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02467-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02467-3

Keywords

Navigation