Abstract
Variability of movement reflects important information for the maintenance of the health of the system. For pathological populations, changes in variability during gait signal the presence of abnormal motor control strategies. For persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), extensive gait problems have been reported including changes in gait variability. While previous studies have focused on footfall variability, the present study used accelerometers on the trunk to measure variability during walking. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the variability of the acceleration pattern of the upper and lower trunk in PwMS compared to healthy controls. We extracted linear and nonlinear measures of gait variability from 30 s of steady state walking for 15 PwMS and 15 age-matched healthy controls. PwMS had altered variability compared to controls with greater Lyapunov exponent in the ML (p < 0.001) and AP (p < 0.001) directions, and greater frequency dispersion in the ML direction (p = 0.034). PwMS also demonstrated greater mean velocity in the ML direction (p = 0.045) and lower root mean square of acceleration in the AP direction (p = 0.040). These findings indicate that PwMS have altered structure of variability of the trunk during gait compared to healthy controls and agree with previous findings related to changes in gait variability in PwMS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauby, C. E., and A. D. Kuo. Active control of lateral balance in human walking. J. Biomech. 33:1433, 2000.
Benedetti, M. G., R. Piperno, L. Simoncini, P. Bonato, A. Tonini, and S. Giannini. Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 5:363, 1999.
Bowen, J., L. Gibbons, A. Gianas, and G. H. Kraft. Self-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test. Mult. Scler. 7:201–206, 2001.
Cameron, M. H., F. B. Horak, R. R. Herndon, and D. Bourdette. Imbalance in multiple sclerosis: a result of slowed spinal somatosensory conduction. Somatosensory Mot. Res. 25:113, 2008.
Cattaneo, D., and J. Jonsdottir. Sensory impairments in quiet standing in subjects with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 15:59, 2009.
Cattaneo, D., C. De Nuzzo, T. Fascia, M. Macalli, I. Pisoni, and R. Cardini. Risks of falls in subjects with multiple sclerosis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 83:864, 2002.
Cavanaugh, J. T., K. M. Guskiewicz, C. Giuliani, S. Marshall, V. S. Mercer, and N. Stergiou. Recovery of postural control after cerebral concussion: new insights using approximate entropy. J. Athl. Train. 41:305, 2006.
Chiari, L., L. Rocchi, and A. Cappello. Stabilometric parameters are affected by anthropometry and foot placement. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 17:666, 2002.
Chung, L. H., J. G. Remelius, R. E. Van Emmerik, and J. A. Kent-Braun. Leg power asymmetry and postural control in women with multiple sclerosis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40:1717, 2008.
Cowan, J. M., J. C. Rothwell, J. P. Dick, P. D. Thompson, B. L. Day, and C. D. Marsden. Abnormalities in central motor pathway conduction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2:304, 1984.
Crenshaw, S.J., T.D. Royer, J.G. Richards, and D.J. Hudson. Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 12:613, 2006.
Frohman, E. M. Multiple sclerosis. Med. Clin. North Am. 87:867, 2003.
Gehlsen, G., K. Beekman, N. Assmann, D. Winant, M. Seidle, and A. Carter. Gait characteristics in multiple sclerosis: progressive changes and effects of exercise on parameters. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 67:536, 1986.
Harbourne, R. T., and N. Stergiou. Nonlinear analysis of the development of sitting postural control. Dev. Psychobiol. 42:368, 2003.
Harbourne, R. T., and N. Stergiou. Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tools: principles to guide physical therapist practice. Phys. Ther. 89:267, 2009.
Hausdorff, J. M., P. L. Purdon, C. K. Peng, Z. Ladin, J. Y. Wei, and A. L. Goldberger. Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations. J. Appl. Physiol. (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 80:1448, 1996.
Henriksen, M., H. Lund, R. Moe-Nilssen, H. Bliddal, and B. Danneskiod-Samsoe. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 19:288–297, 2004.
Hong, S. L., B. Manor, and L. Li. Stance and sensory feedback influence on postural dynamics. Neurosci. Lett. 423:104, 2007.
Huisinga, J. M., M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Supervised resistance training results in changes in postural control in multiple sclerosis patients. Mot. Control 16:50–63, 2011.
Huisinga, J. M., K. K. Schmid, M. L. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Persons with multiple sclerosis show altered joint kinetics during walking after participating in elliptical exercise. J. Appl. Biomech. 28:249–257, 2012.
Huisinga, J. M., J. M. Yentes, M. L. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Postural control strategy during standing is altered in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosci. Lett. 524:124–128, 2012.
Iosa, M., A. Fusco, G. Morone, L. Pratesi, P. Coiro, V. Venturiero, D. De Angelis, M. Bragoni, and S. Paolucci. Assessment of upper-body dynamic stability during walking in patients with subacute stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 49:439–450, 2012.
Iosa, M., C. Mazza, F. Pecoraro, I. Aprile, E. Ricci, and A. Cappozzo. Control of the upper body movements during level walking in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Gait Posture 31:68–72, 2010.
Kaipust, J. P., J. M. Huisinga, M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Gait variability measures reveal differences between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Mot. Control 16:229–244, 2012.
Kavanagh, J. J., R. S. Barrett, and S. Morrison. Upper body accelerations during walking in healthy young and elderly men. Gait Posture 20:291–298, 2004.
Kavanagh, J. J., and H. B. Menz. Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait Posture 28:1–15, 2008.
Kuo, A. Stabilization of lateral motion in passive dynamic walking. Int. J. Robot. Res. 18:917–930, 1999.
Kurtzke, J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444, 1983.
Lamoth, C. J., O. G. Meijer, P. I. Wuisman, J. H. van Dieen, M. F. Levin, and P. J. Beek. Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during walking in persons with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 27:E92–E99, 2002.
Lance, J. W. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology 30:1303–1313, 1980.
Lipsitz, L. A., and A. L. Goldberger. Loss of ‘complexity’ and aging. Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. JAMA 267:1806–1809, 1992.
Marigold, D. S., and A. E. Patla. Age-related changes in gait for multi-surface terrain. Gait Posture 27:689–696, 2008.
Mazza, C., M. Iosa, F. Pecoraro, and A. Cappozzo. Control of the upper body accelerations in young and elderly women during level walking. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 5:30, 2008.
Mazza, C., M. Iosa, P. Picerno, and A. Cappozzo. Gender differences in the control of the upper body accelerations during level walking. Gait Posture 29:300–303, 2009.
Mazza, C., M. Zok, and A. Cappozzo. Head stabilization in children of both genders during level walking. Gait Posture 31:429–432, 2010.
Moe-Nilssen, R., M. K. Aaslund, C. Hodt-Billington, and J. L. Helbostad. Gait variability measures may represent different constructs. Gait Posture 32:98–101, 2010.
Moe-Nilssen, R., and J. L. Helbostad. Trunk accelerometry as a measure of balance control during quiet standing. Gait Posture 16:60–68, 2002.
Moe-Nilssen, R. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 2: gait analysis. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 13:328–335, 1998.
Newell, K. M. Applications of nonlinear dynamics to developmental process modeling. In: Degrees of Freedom and the Development of Center of Pressure Profiles, edited by K. M. Newell and P. M. C. Molenaar. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997, p. 63.
Noseworthy, J. H., C. Lucchinetti, M. Rodriguez, and B. G. Weinshenker. Multiple sclerosis. New Engl. J. Med. 343:938, 2000.
O’Connor, S. M., and A. D. Kuo. Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing. J. Neurophysiol. 102:1411, 2009.
Pincus, S. M., I. M. Gladstone, and R. A. Ehrenkranz. A regularity statistic for medical data analysis. J. Clin. Monit. 7:335, 1991.
Pincus, S. M. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 88:2297, 1991.
Prieto, T. E., J. B. Myklebust, R. G. Hoffmann, E. G. Lovett, and B. M. Myklebust. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Eng. 43:956, 1996.
Remelius, J. G., S. L. Jones, J. D. House, M. A. Busa, J. L. Averill, K. Sugumaran, J. A. Kent-Braun, and R. E. Van Emmerik. Gait impairments in persons with multiple sclerosis across preferred and fixed walking speeds. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93:1637–1642, 2012.
Rizzo, M. A., O. C. Hadjimichael, J. Preiningerova, and T. L. Vollmer. Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 10:589–595, 2004.
Rocchi, L., L. Chiari, and F. B. Horak. Effects of deep brain stimulation and levodopa on postural sway in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 73:267, 2002.
Shumway-Cook, A., and M. H. Woollacott. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. New York, NY: Lippincott Willliams & Wilkins, 2001.
Sosnoff, J. J., M. D. Goldman, and R. W. Motl. Real-life walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: preliminary comparison of four methods for processing accelerometry data. Mult. Scler. 16:868–877, 2010.
Sosnoff, J. J., B. M. Sandroff, and R. W. Motl. Quantifying gait abnormalities in persons with multiple sclerosis with minimal disability. Gait Posture 2012.
Spain, R. I., R. J. St George, A. Salarian, M. Mancini, J. M. Wagner, F. B. Horak, and D. Bourdette. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture 2012.
Stergiou, N., U. H. Buzzi, M. J. Kurz, and J. Heidel. Nonlinear tools in human movement. In: Innovative analyses for human movement, edited by N. Stergiou. Human Kinetics, Champaign: IL, 2004, pp. 63–90.
Stergiou, N., R. Harbourne, and J. Cavanaugh. Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 30:120, 2006.
Van Emmerik, R. E., J. G. Remelius, M. B. Johnson, L. H. Chung, and J. A. Kent-Braun. Postural control in women with multiple sclerosis: effects of task, vision and symptomatic fatigue. Gait Posture 32:608, 2010.
Wilhelmsen, K., S. H. Nordahl, and R. Moe-Nilssen. Attenuation of trunk acceleration during walking in patients with unilateral vestibular deficiencies. J. Vestib. Res. Equilib. Orientat. 20:439–446, 2010.
Wolf, A., J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, and J. A. Vastano. Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Phys. D 16:285–317, 1985.
Wurdeman, S. R., J. M. Huisinga, M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Multiple sclerosis affects the frequency content in the vertical ground reaction forces during walking. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 26:207–212, 2011.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society’s Rehabilitation Research Training Grant and the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon’s Early Clinical Investigator Award.
Conflict of interest
The authors certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0868-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huisinga, J.M., Mancini, M., St. George, R.J. et al. Accelerometry Reveals Differences in Gait Variability Between Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Controls. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 1670–1679 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0697-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0697-y