Skip to main content
Log in

Anisotropic Diffusive Transport in Annulus Fibrosus: Experimental Determination of the Diffusion Tensor by FRAP Technique

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The annulus fibrosus (AF) of the intervertebral disc (IVD) exhibits a fiber-organized structure which is responsible for anisotropic and inhomogeneous mechanical and transport properties. Due to its particular morphology, nutrient transport within AF is regulated by complex transport kinetics. This work investigates the diffusive transport of a small solute in the posterior and anterior regions of AF since diffusion is the major transport mechanism for low molecular weight nutrients (e.g., oxygen and glucose) in IVD.

Diffusion coefficient (D) of fluorescein (332 Da) in bovine coccygeal AF was measured in the three major (axial, circumferential, and radial) directions of the IVD by means of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) technique. It was found that the diffusion coefficient was anisotropic and inhomogeneous. In both anterior and posterior regions, the diffusion coefficient in the radial direction was found to be the lowest. Circumferential and axial diffusion coefficients were not significantly different in both posterior and anterior regions and their values were about 130% and 150% the value of the radial diffusion coefficient, respectively. The values of diffusion coefficients in the anterior region were in general higher than those of corresponding diffusion coefficients in the posterior region.

This study represents the first quantitative analysis of anisotropic diffusion transport in AF by means of FRAP technique and provides additional knowledge on understanding the pathways of nutritional supply into IVD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson G. B., H. S. An, T. R. Oegema, L. A. Setton. Directions for future research. J. Bone Joint Surg. 88:110–114, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod D., D. E. Koppel, J. Schlessinger, E. Elson, W. W. Webb. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys. J. 16:1055–1069, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayotte D. C., K. Ito, S. M. Perren, S. Tepic. Direction-dependent constriction flow in a poroelastic solid: the intervertebral disc valve. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:587–593, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belloulata K., J. Konrad. Fractal image compression with region-based functionality. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11:351–362, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berk D. A., F. Yuan, M. Leunig, R. K. Jain. Fluorescence photobleaching with spatial Fourier analysis: measurement of diffusion in light-scattering media. Biophys. J. 65:2428–2436, 1993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berk D. A., F. Yuan, M. Leunig, R. K. Jain. Direct in vivo measurement of targeted binding in a human tumor xenograft. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1785–1790, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berlemann U., N. C. Gries, R. J. Moore. The relationship between height, shape and histological changes in early degeneration of the lower lumbar discs. Eur. Spine J. 7:212–217, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bibby S. R., J. C. Fairbank, M. R. Urban, J. P. Urban. Cell viability in scoliotic discs in relation to disc deformity and nutrient levels. Spine 27:2220–2228, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blonk J. C. G., A. Don, H. van Aalst, J. J. Birmingham. Fluorescence photobleaching recovery in the confocal scanning light microscope. J. Microsc. 169:363–374, 1993

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Braeckmans K., L. Peeters, N. N. Sanders, S. C. De Smedt, J. Demeester. Three-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with the confocal scanning laser microscope. Biophys. J. 85:2240–2252, 2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Braga J., J. M. Desterro, M. Carmo-Fonseca. Intracellular macromolecular mobility measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with confocal scanning laser microscope. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:4749–4760, 2004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buckwalter J. A. Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 20:1307–1314, 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassidy J. J., A. Hiltner, E. Baer. Hierarchical structure of the intervertebral disc. Connect. Tissue Res. 23:75–88, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chary S. R., R. K. Jain. Direct measurement of interstitial convection and diffusion of albumin in normal and neoplastic tissues by fluorescence photobleaching. PNAS 86:5385–5389, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiu E. J., D. C. Newitt, M. R. Segal, S. S. Hu, J. C. Lotz, S. Majumdar. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of relaxation and water diffusion in the human lumbar intervertebral disc under compression in vitro. Spine 26:E437–E444, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elliott D. M., L. A. Setton. Anisotropic and inhomogeneous tensile behavior of the human anulus fibrosus: experimental measurement and material model predictions. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:256–263, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eyre D. R., P. Benya, J. Buckwalter, B. Caterson, D. Heinegard, T. Oegema, R. Pearce, M. Pope, J. Urban. Intervertebral disk: basic science perspectives. In: New Perspectives on Low Back Pain, J. W. Frymoyer, S. L. Gordon (eds) Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1989, pp. 147–207

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson S. J., K. Ito, L. P. Nolte. Fluid flow and convective transport of solutes within the intervertebral disc. J. Biomech. 37:213–221, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujita Y., D. R. Wagner, A. A. Biviji, N. A. Duncan, J. C. Lotz. Anisotropic shear behavior of the annulus fibrosus: effect of harvest site and tissue prestrain. Med. Eng. Phys. 22:349–357, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gruber H. E., E. J. Hanley. Recent advances in disc cell biology. Spine 28:186–193, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu W. Y., M. A. Justiz. Apparatus for measuring the swelling dependent electrical conductivity of charged hydrated soft tissues. J. Biomech. Eng. 124:790–793, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gu W. Y., X. G. Mao, R. J. Foster, M. Weidenbaum, V. C. Mow, B. A. Rawlins. The anisotropic hydraulic permeability of human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Influence of age, degeneration, direction, and water content. Spine 24:2449–2455, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayat, M. A. Fixation for Electron Microscope. Academic Press, pp. 501, 1982

  24. Holm S., A. Maroudas, J. P. Urban, G. Selstam, A. Nachemson. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: solute transport and metabolism. Connect. Tissue Res. 8:101–119, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Holm S., Nachemson A. (1982) Nutritional changes in the canine intervertebral disc after spinal fusion. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 169:243–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Horner H. A., J. P. Urban. Volvo Award Winner in Basic Science Studies: effect of nutrient supply on the viability of cells from the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc. Spine 26:2543–2549, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsu E. W., L. A. Setton. Diffusion tensor microscopy of the intervertebral disc anulus fibrosus. Magn. Reson. Med. 41:992–999, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Iatridis J. C., I. ap Gwynn. Mechanisms for mechanical damage in the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus. J. Biomech. 37:1165–1175, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jackson A. R., H. Yao, M. D. Brown, W. Y. Gu. Anisotropic ion diffusivity in intervertebral disc: an electrical conductivity approach. Spine 31:2783–2789, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacobson K., Z. Derzko, E. S. Wu, Y. Hou, G. Poste. Measurement of the lateral mobility of cell surface components in single, living cells by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. J. Supramol. Struct. 5:565–576, 1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leddy H. A., F. Guilak. Site-specific molecular diffusion in articular cartilage measured using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31:753–760, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leddy H. A., M. A. Haider, F. Guilak. Diffusional anisotropy in collagenous tissues: fluorescence imaging of continuous point photobleaching. Biophys. J. 91:311–316, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lopez A., L. Dupou, A. Alitibelli, J. Trotard, J. F. Tocanne. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments under conditions of uniform disk illumination. Critical comparison of analytical solutions, and a new mathematical method for calculation of diffusion coefficient D. Biophys. J. 53:963–970, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mullineaux C. W. FRAP analysis of photosynthetic membranes. J. Exp. Bot. 55:1207–1211, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nachemson A., T. Lewin, A. Maroudas, M. A. Freeman. In vitro diffusion of dye through the end-plates and the annulus fibrosus of human lumbar inter-vertebral discs. Acta Orthop. Scand. 41:589–607, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ohshima H., H. Tsuji, N. Hiarano, H. Ishihara, Y. Katoh, H. Yamada. Water diffusion pathway, swelling pressure, and biomechanical properties of the intervertebral disc during compression load. Spine 14:1234–1244, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Peters R., U. Kubitscheck. Scanning microphotolysis: three-dimensional diffusion measurement and optical single-transporter recording. Methods 18:508–517, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Peters R., J. Peters, K. H. Tews, W. Bahr. A microfluorimetric study of translational diffusion in erythrocyte membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 367:282–294, 1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pluen A., P. A. Netti, R. K. Jain, D. A. Berk. Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: comparison of linear and globular configuration. Biophys. J. 77:542–552, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Selard E., A. Shirazi-Adl, J. Urban. Finite element study of nutrient diffusion in the human intervertebral disc. Spine 28:1945–1953, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith B. A., W. R. Clark, H. M. McConnell. Anisotropic molecular motion on cell surfaces. PNAS 76:5641–5644, 1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Soukane D. M., A. Shirazi-Adl, J. Urban. Analysis of nonlinear coupled diffusion of oxygen and lactic acid in intervertebral discs. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:1121–1126, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sprague B. L., R. L. Pego, D. A. Stavreva, J. G. McNally. Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys. J. 86:3473–3495, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stolpen A. H., J. S. Pober, C. S. Brown, D. E. Golan. Class I major histocompatibility complex proteins diffuse isotropically on immune interferon-activated endothelial cells despite anisotropic cell shape and cytoskeletal organization: application of fluorescence photobleaching recovery with an elliptical beam. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:1844–1848, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor J. R. Growth of human intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies. J. Anat. 120:49–68, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsay T. T., K. Jacobson. Spatial Fourier analysis of video photobleaching measurements. Principles and optimization. Biophys. J. 60:360–368, 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tseng K. C., N. J. Turro, C. J. Durning. Molecular mobility in polymer thin films. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip.Topics. 61:1800–1811, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Urban J. P. The role of the physicochemical environment in determining disc cell behaviour. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 30:858–864, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Urban J. P., S. Holm, A. Maroudas. Diffusion of small solutes into the intervertebral disc: as in vivo study. Biorheology 15:203–221, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Urban J. P. G., S. Holms, A. Maroudas, A. Nachemson. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: an in vivo study of solute transport. Clin. Orthop. 129:101–114, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Urban J. P., S. Smith, J. C. Fairbank. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine 29:2700–2709, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yao H., W. Y. Gu. Physical signals and solute transport in cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression: finite element analysis. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32:380–390, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yao H., W. Y. Gu. Physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc during compressive stress relaxation: 3D finite element analysis. Biorheology 43:323–335, 2006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yao, H., and W. Y. Gu. Three-dimensional inhomogeneous triphasic finite-element analysis of physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc under axial compression. J. Biomech. 40:2071–2077, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by Grant Number AR050609 from NIH/NIAMS. The authors wish to thank Dr. Weizhao Zhao and Tai Yi Yuan for their assistance in imaging analysis and specimen preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Yong Gu.

Appendix

Appendix

When a tissue sample is bleached over its whole thickness in a FRAP test, the diffusive transport of fluorescent probes occurs within the focal plane of the microscope objective and diffusion is 2D phenomenon. This condition is practically achievable when the thickness of the sample is comparable to the optical slice of the microscope objective (e.g., in membranes or polymeric films). In a FRAP test with CLSM on bulk samples, the bleached region does not extend over the entire thickness of the specimen. Therefore, the presence of a gradient of concentration of fluorescent solute in the direction orthogonal to the focal plane (z-direction) causes fluorescence recovery to be a 3D diffusion phenomenon.9,10,37 If 2D SFA is adopted in the analysis of FRAP test data, the contribution of the diffusive flux in the z-direction is neglected. Consequently, the calculated diffusion coefficient (D) is overestimated. The error in the estimation of D depends on two factors: (1) the ratio of the bleached size (d), in the focal plane, to the thickness (L) of the bleached volume (Fig. 7); and (2) the ratio of the diffusion coefficient in the z-direction to the averaged diffusion coefficient in the focal plane (D/D).

Figure 7
figure 7

Schematic of the computational domain: (a) the three-dimensional sample is confined between two glass slides (top and bottom) with a cylinder representing bleached volume, obtained by multi-layer bleaching; (b) Cross-sectional view of the sample and the applied boundary conditions

In order to quantify the error in the estimation of the diffusion coefficient by using the 2D SFA approach presented in this work, a numerical analysis was performed to simulate 3D diffusive transport of fluorescent molecules within a bulk sample using finite element method (COMSOL® 3.2, COMSOL Inc., Burlington, MA).

Figure 7a represents a schematic of the computational domain. A cubic sample of 460 μm side is placed between two glass slides. The initial fluorescent solute concentration within the cubic domain was assumed to be uniform with exception for a cylindrical volume, representing the bleached region, in which fluorescent probe concentration is zero. The diameter d of the cylinder was set equal to 28.75 μm in order to simulate the experimental conditions, see Materials and Methods. The height of the cylinder L varied according to the number of the planes being bleached in the simulation.

Since the domain is confined between to glass slides, on the bottom and top surfaces of the cube, an impermeable boundary condition (diffusive flux J = 0) was imposed. Besides, since the cube is large enough with respect to the diameter of the cylinder, the solute concentrations on the lateral surfaces of the cube were assumed to be constant (c = c*), see Fig. 7b.

Numerical simulations were performed using ∼35,000 quadratic Lagrange tetrahedral elements. The degree of anisotropy in diffusion was simulated with the ratio of diffusion coefficient in the z-direction to that in the x–y plane (D/D) varying from one (isotropy) to two. From each simulation a time series of 200 frames, representing the images on the focal plane of the microscope objective (7 μm from the bottom of the sample, see Materials and Methods), were extracted and analyzed by custom-made SFA software (see Materials and Methods).

Figure 8 shows the relative error in the estimation of D av by Eq. (7) as a function of L/d for different degrees of anisotropy. The relative error increases with the ratio D/D but decreases with L/d. By increasing the height of the bleached volume (cylinder), the relative error decreases (less than 7% for D/D = 2, when L/d = 2) and, theoretically, it could be reduced to zero for sufficiently large values of L/d (or small values of D/D). This indicates that the diffusive flux in the z-direction could be negligible under certain conditions.

Figure 8
figure 8

Relative error in the estimation of D av as a function of L/d for different degrees of anisotropy in diffusion (D/D)

In practice only a few layers can be sequentially bleached within the bulk sample before fluorescence recovery occurs in the earlier bleached planes. According to the testing protocol used in this work, four layers were sequentially bleached, generating a cylindrical bleach region of 28 μm diameter and 47 μm height (see Materials and Methods). By measuring the intensity of the fluorescence emission within the bleached volume (cylinder), three regions were identified (measured from the bottom glass slide): (1) from 0 to 17 μm, the fluorescence was completely depleted; (2) from 17 to 27 μm, the fluorescence linearly increased (i.e., recovered) to 50% of the intensity of the surrounding unbleached tissue (I o ); (3) from 27 to 47 μm, the fluorescence intensity was approximately 50% of the value of I o (data not shown). Since the light intensity is proportional to the concentration of fluorescent molecules,5 the above information was used as an initial condition for probe concentration in the numerical simulation on mass transport of fluorescent solute, in order to evaluate the relative error committed in the determination of D av using 2D SFA. Our simulation showed that the highest relative error (in the case D/D = 2) is approximately 18%.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Travascio, F., Gu, W.Y. Anisotropic Diffusive Transport in Annulus Fibrosus: Experimental Determination of the Diffusion Tensor by FRAP Technique . Ann Biomed Eng 35, 1739–1748 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9346-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9346-2

Keywords

Navigation