Polymeric heart valves have the potential to reduce thrombogenic complications associated with current mechanical valves and overcome fatigue-related problems experienced by bioprosthetic valves. In this paper we characterize the in vitro velocity and Reynolds Shear Stress (RSS) fields inside and downstream of three different prototype trileaflet polymeric heart valves. The fluid dynamic differences are then correlated with variations in valve design parameters. The three valves differ in leaflet thickness, ranging from 80 to 120 μm, and commisural design, either closed, opened, or semi-opened. The valves were subjected to aortic flow conditions and the velocity measured using three-dimensional stereo Particle Image Velocimetry. The peak forward flow phase in the three valves was characterized by a strong central orifice jet of approximately 2 m/s with a flat profile along the trailing edge of the leaflets. Leakage jets, with principle RSS magnitudes exceeding 4,500 dyn/cm2, were observed in all valves with larger leaflet thicknesses and also corresponded to larger leakage volumes. Additional leakage jets were observed at the commissural region of valves with the open and the semi-open commissural designs. The results of the present study indicate that commissural design and leaflet thickness influence valve fluid dynamics and thus the thrombogenic potential of trileaflet polymeric valves.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bernacca, G. M., T. G. Mackay, M. J. Gulbransen, A. W. Donn, and D. J. Wheatley. Polyurethane heart valve durability: Effects of leaflet thickness and material. Int. J. Artif. Organs 20(6):327–331, 1997.
Bernacca, G. M., T. G. Mackay, R. Wilkinson, and D. J. Wheatley. Calcification and fatigue failure in a polyurethane heart value. Biomaterials 16(4):279–285, 1995.
Bernacca, G. M., B. O'Connor, D. F. Williams, and D. J. Wheatley. Hydrodynamic function of polyurethane prosthetic heart valves: Influences of Young's modulus and leaflet thickness. Biomaterials 23(1):45–50, 2002.
Bodnar, E., and R. Frater, eds. Replacement Cardiac Valves. New York: Pergamon press, 1991, p.482.
Chandran, K. B., R. Fatemi, R. Schoephoerster, D. Wurzel, G. Hansen, G. Pantalos, L. S. Yu, and W. J. Kolff. In vitro comparison of velocity profiles and turbulent shear distal to polyurethane trileaflet and pericardial prosthetic valves. Artif. Organs 13(2):148–154, 1989.
Daebritz, S. H., B. Fausten, B. Hermanns, J. Schroeder, J. Groetzner, R. Autschbach, B. J. Messmer, and J. S. Sachweh. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.. 25(6):946–952, 2004.
Daebritz, S. H., J. S. Sachweh, B. Hermanns, B. Fausten, A. Franke, J. Groetzner, B. Klosterhalfen, and B. J. Messmer. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for mitral position. Circulation 108 (Suppl 1):II134–II139, 2003.
Ellis, J. T., T. M. Healy, A. A. Fontaine, R. Saxena, and A. P. Yoganathan. Velocity measurements and flow patterns within the hinge region of a Medtronic Parallel bileaflet mechanical valve with clear housing. J. Heart Valve Dis. 5(6):591–599, 1996.
Ellis, J. T., and A. P. Yoganathan. A comparison of the hinge and near-hinge flow fields of the St Jude medical hemodynamic plus and regent bileaflet mechanical heart valves. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 119(1):83–93, 2000.
Goldsmith, I., S. Mukundan, A. Nugent, and M. D. Rosin. Early clinical experience with the Tissuemed porcine bioprosthesis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 66(Suppl 6 ):S259–S263, 1998.
Herold, M., H. B. Lo, H. Reul, H. Muckter, K. Taguchi, M. Giesiepen, G. Birkle, G. Hollweg, G. Rau, and B. J. Messmer. The Helmoltz-institute-tri-leaflet-polyurethane-heart valve prosthesis: Design, manufacturing and first in-vitro and in vivo results. In: Polyurethanes in Biomedical Engineering II, edited by H. E. A. Planck. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1987, pp. 231–268.
Hyde, J. A., J. A. Chinn, and R. E. Phillips Jr.. Polymer heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis. 8(3):331–339, 1999.
Jamieson, W. R., L. H. Burr, W. N. Anderson Jr., J. B. Chambers, J. P. Gams, and C. M. Dowd. Prosthesis-related complications: First-year annual rates. J. Heart Valve Dis. 11(6):758–763, 2002.
Jansen, J., S. Willeke, B. Reiners, P. Harbott, H. Reul, H. B. Lo, S. Dabritz, C. Rosenbaum, A. Bitter, and K. Ziehe. Advances in design principle and fluid dynamics of a flexible polymeric heart valve. ASAIO Trans. 37(3):M451–M453, 1991.
Leat, M. E., and J. Fisher. The influence of manufacturing methods on the function and performance of a synthetic leaflet heart valve. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H]. 209(1):65–69, 1995.
Leo, H. L., H. Simon, J. Carberry, S. C. Lee, and A. P. Yoganathan. A comparison of flow field structures of two tri-leaflet polymeric heart valves. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(4):429–443, 2005.
Lu, P. C., H. C. Lai, and J. S. Liu. A reevaluation and discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow. J. Biomech. 34(10):1361–1364, 2001.
Mackay, T. G., D. J. Wheatley, G. M. Bernacca, A. C. Fisher, and C. S. Hindle. New polyurethane heart valve prosthesis: Design, manufacture and evaluation. Biomaterials 17(19):1857–1863, 1996.
Sallam, A. M., and N. H. Hwang. Human red blood cell hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow: Contribution of Reynolds shear stresses. Biorheology 21(6):783–797, 1984.
Turitto, V. T., and C. L. Hall. Mechanical factors affecting hemostasis and thrombosis. Thromb. Res. 92(6 Suppl 2):S25–S31, 1998.
Vyavahare, N., M. Ogle, F. J. Schoen, R. Zand, D. C. Gloeckner, M. Sacks, and R. J. Levy. Mechanisms of bioprosthetic heart valve failure: Fatigue causes collagen denaturation and glycosaminoglycan loss. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 46(1):44–50, 1999.
Wheatley, D. J., G. M. Bernacca, M. M. Tolland, B. O'Connor, J. Fisher, and D. F. Williams. Hydrodynamic function of a biostable polyurethane flexible heart valve after six months in sheep. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 24(2):95–101, 2001.
Woo, Y. R., F. P. Williams, and A. P. Yoganathan. In-vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of the abiomed trileaflet heart valve prosthesis. J. Biomech. Eng. 105(4):338–345, 1983.
Woo, Y. R., F. P. Williams, and A. P. Yoganathan. Steady and pulsatile flow studies on a trileaflet heart valve prosthesis. Scand. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 17(3):227–236, 1983.
Yoganathan, A. P. Cardiac valve prostheses. In: The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. CRC Press LLC, pp. 127-1–127-23, 2000.
Yoganathan, A. P., Y. R. Woo, H. W. Sung, F. P. Williams, R. H. Franch, and M. Jones. In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 92(2):198–209, 1986.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partially supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (HL 720621). The authors wish to thank Aortech, Inc for providing the prototype valves.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leo, H.L., Dasi, L., Carberry, J. et al. Fluid Dynamic Assessment of Three Polymeric Heart Valves Using Particle Image Velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng 34, 936–952 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9117-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9117-5