Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The standard management for localized prostate cancer (PC) is radical treatment, such as radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy [1]. However, deterioration of urinary [2] and sexual function [3] is considered the main issue following radical treatment. With the development of diagnostic imaging technologies, individualization is being incorporated into cancer treatment, with each individual patient’s cancer condition being evaluated. The development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has contributed to the accurate diagnosis of localization of PC, and has contributed to tailor-made treatment such as “focal therapy” that cures PC while preserving the anatomical structures related to urinary and sexual function [4]. Recently, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has become a modality for focal therapy. HIFU is considered an attractive treatment modality for localized PC based on its long-term clinical results. HIFU is frequently used because it is appropriate for PC treatment in combination with three-dimensional millimeter-accurate planning in real-time trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) [5, 6] and MRI [7, 8], allowing for a distinct margin between the treated area and the adjacent untreated tissue without puncturing the prostate [9]. As no special construction work is required for installation, TRUS-guided HIFU is widely used as an ultrasound treatment device for localized PC, especially for focal therapy [10, 11].
History of high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer
The anti-cancer effect of HIFU was confirmed using rats with a subcutaneously implanted PC cell line [12, 13], and clinical application was evaluated using a canine prostate model [14,15,16]. Madersbacher et al. reported HIFU treatment for patients with PC as experimental focal ablation just before surgical resection of the prostate [9]. The temperature of the entire focal ablation area ranged from 70 to 98.6 °C during the ablation, as measured with a trans-peritoneal thermocouple, and the entire targeted area of the prostate was treated precisely [9]. Further, Beerlage et al. performed experimental hemi-ablation in nine patients 7–12 days before surgical resection of the prostate and confirmed the pathological changes (focal coagulation and necrosis) in the treated area [17].
Based on these preclinical studies, HIFU has been performed as a modality for whole-gland therapy for localized PC. Specifically, the 8-year disease-free survival rates for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer were 76–80.4%, 63–67.7%, and 57–69.6%, respectively, using the Phoenix American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) definition [5, 6]. Despite encouraging oncological outcomes, the occurrence of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in 6.5–41.1% [5, 18, 19] of patients who were treated with whole-gland HIFU was an issue that necessitated changing the treatment strategy with HIFU (Fig. 1).
In previous reports, MRI-trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion image-guided biopsy [20], a representative technique of MRI-based targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy achieved a high detection rate of PC, which was the largest or highest malignancy (Gleason scores) of PC in each patient. The development of localization of PC has contributed to tailor-made treatment such as “focal therapy” that cures PC while preserving the anatomical structures related to urinary and sexual function. HIFU has been reported as a representative modality for focal therapy. Five-year actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in patients in the low- and high-risk groups were 75% and 36%, respectively [21]. In a large multicenter prospective study with medium-term follow-up, the rates of failure-free survival (FFS)—which is defined as the avoidance of local salvage therapy with surgery or radiotherapy, systemic therapy, metastases, or PC-specific death—in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 96%, 88%, and 84% in the 5-year follow-up [22] and 88%, 68%, and 65% in the 7-year follow-up [23], respectively. Regarding urinary function, continence was preserved in 80%–100% of patients after treatment [8, 21, 22, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. ED occurred in 14%–30% of patients [8, 21, 24, 26,27,28,29,30]. Urethral stricture has been reported to be less than 5%. In a clinical study evaluating the risk factors for contemporary deterioration in urinary function after focal therapy, there was a greater risk of urinary dysfunction with treatment in the bilateral anterior transition portion of the prostate than in the other portions during the treatment [31]. In a clinical study evaluating the risk factors for severe ED after focal therapy, pre-procedural lower condition of erectile function and treatment of the edge of the peripheral zone of the prostate in proximity to the neurovascular bundle were significant risk factors [32]. The results of these clinical studies will contribute to improving the informed consent process in patients considering receiving focal therapy with HIFU as a treatment for localized PC.
Approval as advanced medical care and future outlook
Recently, a multicenter prospective study of focal therapy with HIFU has been initiated to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy in pair-matched patients. Based on the clinical results of focal therapy and study design development, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare approved focal therapy with HIFU as advanced medical care on February 1, 2023. Using the advanced medical care designation, a portion of medical expenses is covered by health insurance. This is the first approval for focal therapy in Japan. The clinical results of the multicenter prospective study will contribute to evaluation of the usefulness of focal therapy as one of the treatment options for patients with localized PC.
References
Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, Part i: introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022;208:10–8.
Shah M, Medina LG, Azhar RA, et al. Urine leak after robotic radical prostatectomy: not all urine leaks come from the anastomosis. J Robot Surg. 2022;16:247–55.
Marchioni M, De Francesco P, Castellucci R, et al. Management of erectile dysfunction following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72:543–54.
Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Kirkham A, et al. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Urol. 2011;185:1246–54.
Crouzet S, Chapelon JY, Rouviere O, et al. Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol. 2014;65:907–14.
Shoji S, Uchida T, Hanada I, et al. Analysis of oncological outcomes of whole-gland therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer in clinical and technical aspects: a retrospective consecutive case-series analysis with a median 5-year follow-up. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38:1205–16.
Ghai S, Perlis N, Lindner U, et al. Magnetic resonance guided focused high frequency ultrasound ablation for focal therapy in prostate cancer—phase 1 trial. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:4281–7.
Ehdaie B, Tempany CM, Holland F, et al. MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:910–8.
Madersbacher S, Pedevilla M, Vingers L, et al. Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on human prostate cancer in vivo. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3346–51.
Shoji S, Koizumi N, Yuzuriha S, et al. Development and future prospective of treatment for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Med Ultrason. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01183-2.
Shoji S, Naruse J, Oda K, et al. Current status and future outlook of ultrasound treatment for prostate cancer. J Med Ultrason. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01368-x.
Chapelon JY, Margonari J, Vernier F, et al. In vivo effects of high-intensity ultrasound on prostatic adenocarcinoma Dunning R3327. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6353–7.
Oosterhof GO, Cornel EB, Smits GA, et al. Influence of high-intensity focused ultrasound on the development of metastases. Eur Urol. 1997;32:91–5.
Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Margonari J, et al. Prostatic tissue destruction by high-intensity focused ultrasound: experimentation on canine prostate. J Endourol. 1993;7:249–53.
Foster RS, Bihrle R, Sanghvi N, et al. Production of prostatic lesions in canines using transrectally administered high-intensity focused ultrasound. Eur Urol. 1993;23:330–6.
Kincaide LF, Sanghvi NT, Cummings O, et al. Noninvasive ultrasonic subtotal ablation of the prostate in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1996;57:1225–7.
Beerlage HP, van Leenders GJ, Oosterhof GO, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed after one to two weeks by radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective study. Prostate. 1999;39:41–6.
Blana A, Brown SC, Chaussy C, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: comparative definitions of biochemical failure. BJU Int. 2009;104:1058–62.
Uchida T, Tomonaga T, Kim H, et al. Improved outcomes with advancements in high intensity focused ultrasound devices for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2015;193:103–10.
Shoji S, Hiraiwa S, Ogawa T, et al. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. Int J Urol. 2017;24:288–94.
van Velthoven R, Aoun F, Marcelis Q, et al. A prospective clinical trial of HIFU hemiablation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016;19:79–83.
Guillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M, et al. A multicentre study of 5-year outcomes following focal therapy in treating clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2018;74:422–9.
Reddy D, Peters M, Shah TT, et al. Cancer control outcomes following focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound in 1379 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a multi-institute 15-year experience. Eur Urol. 2022;81:407–13.
Ahmed HU, Dickinson L, Charman S, et al. Focal ablation targeted to the index lesion in multifocal localised prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Eur Urol. 2015;68:927–36.
Feijoo ER, Sivaraman A, Barret E, et al. Focal high-intensity focused ultrasound targeted hemiablation for unilateral prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016;69:214–20.
Rischmann P, Gelet A, Riche B, et al. Focal high intensity focused ultrasound of unilateral localized prostate cancer: a prospective multicentric hemiablation study of 111 patients. Eur Urol. 2017;71:267–73.
Ganzer R, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, et al. Prospective multicenter phase II study on focal therapy (Hemiablation) of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound. J Urol. 2018;199:983–9.
Johnston MJ, Emara A, Noureldin M, et al. Focal high-intensity focussed ultrasound partial gland ablation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a report of medium-term outcomes from a single-center in the United Kingdom. Urology. 2019;133:175–81.
Shoji S, Hiraiwa S, Uemura K, et al. Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for the localized prostate cancer for Asian based on the localization with MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided transperineal biopsy and 12-cores transperineal systematic biopsy: prospective analysis of oncological and functional outcomes. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:1844–53.
Ghai S, Finelli A, Corr K, et al. MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Localized Intermediate-risk prostate cancer: early results of a phase II Trial. Radiology. 2021;298:695–703.
Hanada I, Shoji S, Takeda K, et al. Significant impact of the anterior transition zone portion treatment on urinary function after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer. J Endourol. 2021;35:951–60.
Shoji S, Kuroda S, Uemura K, et al. Risk factors for severe erectile dysfunction after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2876.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Shoji, S. Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer: approval as advanced medical care and future outlook. J Med Ultrasonics 51, 1–3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01401-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01401-z