Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Zoonotic Disease Exposure Risk and Rabies Vaccination Among Wildlife Professionals

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
EcoHealth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 March 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

More than 70% of zoonotic diseases are wildlife associated putting wildlife professionals at increased risk of occupational exposure. In 2008 and 2018, the Arizona Department of Health Services surveyed Arizona wildlife professionals from multiple agencies to assess the risk of disease exposure, rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) history, personal protective equipment (PPE) use, and zoonoses knowledge. In 2008, a 12-question survey was distributed at a state wildlife professional meeting using an anonymous email link. In 2018, a 20-question survey was distributed using an anonymous email link to wildlife agency employees. We received 164 and 81 complete responses in the 2008 and 2018 surveys, respectively. Bites from rabies reservoir or spillover species were higher in 2008 (42%) than in 2018 (16%). More respondents received PrEP in 2018 (53%) than in 2008 (45%). Among 43 respondents who performed necropsies or collected animal samples within the past 5 years (2014–2018), only 60% always wore latex or nitrile gloves, and 79% never wore a facemask. Respondents indicated lower awareness of certain zoonoses, including brucellosis (72%) and leptospirosis (60%). Results on zoonoses awareness and reasons for non-use of PPE highlighted targets for education to improve practices, including facilitation of PPE training to prevent future disease transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 19 March 2020

    The original version of the article unfortunately contained a typo error in second author name in the author group. The author name was incorrectly published as “Jesse Grewal” and the correct name is “Jessie Grewal”.

References

  • Arizona Department of Health Services (2018) Rabiesdata, publication, and maps. https://www.azdhs.gov/preparedness/epidemiology-disease-control/rabies/#data-publications-maps. Accessed August 15, 2018.

  • Arizona Department of Health Services (2019) Infectious disease epidemiology 20102015 report. https://www.azdhs.gov/documents/preparedness/epidemiology-disease-control/disease-data-statistics-reports/infectious-disease-epidemiology-report-2010-2015.pdf. Accessed January 17, 2019.

  • Baker WS, Gray GC (2009) A review of published reports regarding zoonotic pathogen infection in veterinarians. J Am Vet Med Assoc 234(10):1271–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch SA, Musgrave K, Wong D (2013) Zoonotic disease risk and prevention practices among biologists and other wildlife workers–results from a national survey, US National Park Service, 2009. J Wildl Dis 49(3):475–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan A, Ames NJ, Manning ML, Touchton-Leonard K, Yang L, Wallen R (2016) Factors Influencing Nurses’ Use of Hazardous Drug Safe-Handling Precautions. Oncol Nurs Forum 43(3):342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Preexposure vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/specific_groups/travelers/pre-exposure_vaccinations.html. Accessed January 10, 2019.

  • Garland-Lewis G, Whittier C, Murray S, Trufan S, Rabinowitz PM (2017) Occupational risks and exposures among wildlife health professionals. Ecohealth 14(1):20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanisch-Kirkbride SL, Riley SJ, Gore ML (2013) Wildlife disease and risk perception. J of Wildlife Diseases 49(4):841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JD, Eggett D, Johnson MJ, Reading JC (2014) The influence of risk perception on biosafety level-2 laboratory workers’ hand-to-face contact behaviors. J Occup Environ Hyg 11(9):625–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Daszak P (2008) Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451(7181):990–993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi DA, Verma SK, Brennan MJ, Perry MJ (2009) Factors influencing worker use of personal protective eyewear. Accid Anal Prev 41(4):755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauldin MR, Doty JB, Nakazawa Y, Emerson GL, Carroll DS (2016) The importance of mammalogy, infectious disease research, and biosafety in the field. Manter (Linc) 3.

  • Miller JM, Astles R, Baszler T, Chapin K, Carey R, Garcia L, Gray L, Larone D, Pentella M, Pollock A et al (2012) Centers for disease control and prevention. Guidelines for safe work practices in human and animal medical diagnostic laboratories. Recommendations of a CDC-convened, biosafety blue ribbon panel. MMWR Suppl 61(1):1–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service (2009) National park service occupational safety and health program; reference manual 50B. https://www.nps.gov/policy/RM50Bdoclist.htm.

  • Rupprecht CE, Briggs D, Brown CM, Franka R, Katz SL, Kerr HD, Lett SM, Levis R, Meltzer MI, Schaffner W, et al (2010) Use of a reduced (4-dose) vaccine schedule for postexposure prophylaxis to prevent human rabies: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 59(2):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitek CR, Ksiazek TG, Peters CJ, Breiman RF (1996) Evidence against infection with hantaviruses among forest and park workers in the southwestern United States. Clin Infect Dis 23(2):283–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CJ, Cheftel JM, Elchos BL, Hopkins SG, Levine JF, and National Association for State Public Health Veterinarians (2015) Compendium of veterinary standard precautions for zoonotic disease prevention in veterinary personnel. J Am Vet Med Assoc 247:1252–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong D, Wild MA, Walburger MA, Higgins CL, Callahan M, Czarnecki LA, Lawaczeck EW, Levy CE, Patterson JG, Sunenshine R, et al (2009) Primary pneumonic plague contracted from a mountain lion carcass. Clin Infect Dis 49(3):e33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Anne Justice-Allen, Chasa O’Briean, Lisa Shender, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department, David Bergman (USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services), Kenneth Komatsu, Sonya Shannon, Caleb Wiedeman, and the Arizona Department of Health Services, Brant Goode, John Gibbins, Jessica Rinsky, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Yue Qui and Arizona State University. This study was funded as part of normal routine activities by the Arizona Department of Health Services and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Venkat.

Additional information

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarrant, S., Grewal, J., Yaglom, H. et al. Zoonotic Disease Exposure Risk and Rabies Vaccination Among Wildlife Professionals. EcoHealth 17, 74–83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-020-01469-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-020-01469-w

Keywords

Navigation