Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public–private comparative study of the quality of implementation of the school health programme in a metropolitan city in Nigeria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Nigerian National School Health Policy (NSHPo) was adopted more than a decade ago, yet its quality of implementation (QoI) remains poor. Diverse variations exist between public and private schools yet most studies in Nigeria did not consider this in their evaluation. This study was conducted to assess the QoI of the School Health Programme (SHP) in public and private primary schools in Ibadan metropolis, using the NSHPo framework as a guide.

Subjects and methods

The study utilized a comparative-descriptive cross-sectional design. A two-stage sampling technique was used to select one of five local government areas in a Metropolitan city and 68 primary schools. An observational checklist was used to assess the five domains of the SHP, namely: Healthful School Environment [HSE]; School Health Services [SHS]; Skills Based Health Education [SBHE]; School Feeding Services [SFS], and School, Home, and Community Relationship [SHCR]), as listed in the Nigerian SHPo framework. QoI was assessed by exploring availability, suitability, adequacy, and functionality of the domains measured.

Results

About half of the primary schools (38.5% public; 75.9% private) had first-aid boxes, but they were empty in 66.7% of public and 20.7% of private schools. A few (19.1%) had hand-washing facilities. Almost all the schools (97.1%) did not perform medical examination for school vendors. Only 35.3% of the schools had waste-disposal facilities, of which a significantly higher proportion were in private schools (72.4%) (P < 0.001). None of the schools had counselling schedule or record of counselling sessions. Overall, QoI of the SHP was significantly poor in 36.8% of the schools, with a higher proportion (46.2%) in public schools compared with private schools (24.1%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The School Health Programme in selected urban private and public primary schools had poor quality of implementation but private schools had a better quality of implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Head Teachers for the permission given and for their time.

Funding

The study was sponsored by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayodeji Matthew Adebayo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The procedures of this study, as they involve human participants, were in line with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the principal of each school.

Disclosure

Ayodeji Adebayo has no conflict of interest to declare, Oluyinka Dania has no conflict of interest to declare, Akinwumi Akindele has no conflict of interest to declare, and Temidayo Fawole has no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adebayo, A.M., Dania, O., Akindele, A. et al. Public–private comparative study of the quality of implementation of the school health programme in a metropolitan city in Nigeria. J Public Health (Berl.) 29, 829–837 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01178-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01178-x

Keywords

Navigation