Skip to main content
Log in

Associations between endoscopic findings and functional assessment via multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring in patients with non-erosive reflux disease refractory to proton-pump inhibitors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim

The clinical significance of minimal changes in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is controversial. Multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII-pH) monitoring enables classification of NERD. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between endoscopic findings and functional assessment via MII-pH monitoring in patients with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory NERD.

Methods

Thirty-four PPI-refractory NERD patients were retrospectively analyzed. On the basis of the MII-pH monitoring results, cases were classified as acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and functional heartburn. Minimal changes such as white turbidity, erythema, loss of fine vascular network pattern at the esophagogastric junction, hyperplasia of vascular network at the middle esophagus, hernia, flap valve grade, and atrophic gastritis were evaluated endoscopically.

Results

Among 34 patients, 8 were categorized with acid reflux, 17 with non-acid reflux, and 9 with functional heartburn. There were no differences in the prevalence of minimal changes among the groups, but all cases showing white turbidity of the entire esophageal circumference involved non-acid reflux. The prevalence of hiatal hernia and abnormal flap valve did not differ among the three groups, but the presence of atrophic gastritis was significantly more common in patients with functional heartburn than in those with acid and non-acid reflux. The prevalence of hyperplasia of the vascular network at the middle esophagus was significantly higher in patients with proximal migration than in those without.

Conclusion

There are associations between endoscopic findings and functional assessment via MII-pH monitoring. Future studies should pay more attention to the endoscopic findings at the middle esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujiwara Y, Arakawa T. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of GERD in the Japanese population. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:518–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fass R, Shapiro M, Dekel R, Sewell J. Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—where next? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:79–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dean BB, Gano AD Jr, Knight K, Ofman JJ, Fass R. Effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:656–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fass R. Proton pump inhibitor failure—what are the therapeutic options? Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(Suppl 2):S33–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hongo M. Minimal changes in reflux esophagitis: red ones and white ones. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:95–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, Lundell L, Margulies M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoshihara Y, Hashimoto M. Endoscopic classification of reflux esophagitis (in Japanese). Nippon Rinsho. 2000;58:1808–12 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amano Y, Ishimura N, Furuta K, Okita K, Masaharu M, Azumi T, Ose T, Koshino K, Ishihara S, Adachi K, Kinoshita Y. Interobserver agreement on classifying endoscopic diagnoses of nonerosive esophagitis. Endoscopy. 2006;38:1032–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miwa H, Yokoyama T, Hori K, Sakagami T, Oshima T, Tomita T, Fujiwara Y, Saita H, Itou T, Ogawa H, Nakamura Y, Kishi K, Murayama Y, Hayashi E, Kobayashi K, Tano N, Matsushita K, Kawamoto H, Sawada Y, Ohkawa A, Arai E, Nagao K, Hamamoto N, Sugiyasu Y, Sugimoto K, Hara H, Tanimura M, Honda Y, Isozaki K, Noda S, Kubota S, Himeno S. Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:355–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manabe N, Haruma K, Hoshihara Y, Kinoshita Y, Hongo M, Makuchi H. Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade reflux esophagitis, including minimal changes. Esophagus. 2012;9:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takubo K, Honma N, Aryal G, Sawabe M, Arai T, Tanaka Y, Mafune K, Iwakiri K. Is there a set of histologic changes that are invariably reflux associated? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:159–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, Kahrilas PJ. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut. 2004;53:1024–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zerbib F, Duriez A, Roman S, Capdepont M, Mion F. Determinants of gastro-oesophageal reflux perception in patients with persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2008;57:156–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohata Y, Fujiwara Y, Machida H, Okazaki H, Yamagami H, Tanigawa T, Watanabe K, Watanabe T, Tominaga K, Arakawa T. Pathogenesis of proton-pump inhibitor-refractory non-erosive reflux disease according to multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(Suppl 3):58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kogure T, Akiyama H, Itai Y, Okayama Y, Kimura K, Dochi K. Diagnosis and clinical course of esophagitis—criteria for endoscopic diagnosis as compared with histological findings. Stomach and Intestine. 1972;7:1293–304 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Makuuchi H. Clinical study of sliding esophageal hernia—with special reference to the diagnostic criteria and classification of the severity of the disease. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1982;79:1557–67 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, Aye RW, Mercer CD, Low DE, Pope 2nd CE. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:541-7.

  18. Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its siginificance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy. 1969;3:87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohara S, Kouzu T, Kawano T, Kusano M. Nationwide epidemiological survey regarding heartburn and reflux esophagitis in Japanese. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2005;102:1010–24 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura T, Shirakawa K, Masuyama H, Sugaya H, Hiraishi H, Terano A. Minimal change oesophagitis: a disease with characteristic differences to erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(Suppl 2):19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JH, Kim N, Chung IK, Jo YJ, Seo GS, Kim SW, Im EH, Kim HR, Park SH, Lee SY, Cha HM, Lee KS, Hyun DH, Kim HY, Kim SM, Shin JE, Park SH, Chung HC, Chung IS. Clinical significance of minimal change lesions of the esophagus in a healthy Korean population: a nationwide multi-center prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1153–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JB, Shin SR, Shin WG, Choi MH, Jang HJ, Kim KO, Park CH, Baek IH, Baik GH, Kim KH, Park SH, Kae SH, Lee MS, Kim HY. Prevalence of minimal change lesions in patients with non-erosive reflux disease: a case–control study. Digestion. 2012;85:288–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiesslich R, Kanzler S, Vieth M, Moehler M, Neidig J, Thanka Nadar BJ, Schilling D, Burg J, Nafe B, Neurath MF, Galle PR. Minimal change esophagitis: prospective comparison of endoscopic and histological markers between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and normal controls using magnifying endoscopy. Dig Dis. 2004;22:221–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kusano M, Shirai N, Yamaguchi K, Hongo M, Chiba T, Kinoshita Y. It is possible to classify non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients into endoscopically normal groups and minimal change groups by subjective symptoms and responsiveness to rabeprazole—a report from a study with Japanese patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:3082–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JH, Park H, Lee YC. Is minimal change esophagitis really part of the spectrum of endoscopic findings of gastroesophageal reflux disease? A prospective, multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:190–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, Vakil N, Halling K, Wernersson B, Lind T. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1030–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Joh T, Miwa H, Higuchi K, Shimatani T, Manabe N, Adachi K, Wada T, Sasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Hongo M, Chiba T, Kinoshita Y. Validity of endoscopic classification of nonerosive reflux disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:444–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lei WY, Liu TT, Yi CH, Chen CL. Disease characteristics in non-erosive reflux disease with and without endoscopically minimal change esophagitis: are they different? Digestion. 2012;85:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sifrim D, Zerbib F. Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2012;61:1340–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kouzu T, Yamada H, Miyazaki S, Yoshimura K, Hishikawa E, Arima M, Harada N, Ichinose M, Ninomiya E, Isono K. A proposed classification of reflux esophagitis with special references to the endoscopic aspects. Stomach Intest. 1992;27:1003–8 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yoshikawa I, Yamasaki M, Yamasaki T, Kume K, Otsuki M. Lugol chromoendoscopy as a diagnostic tool in so-called endoscopy-negative GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:698–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma P, Wani S, Bansal A, Hall S, Puli S, Mathur S, Rastogi A. A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:454–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Banerjee R, Reddy DN. Minimal-change esophagitis on narrow-band imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:A26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical Statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Conflict of interest

All authors, Y. Fujiwara, Y. Kohata, T. Tanigawa, H. Yamagami, M. Shiba, K. Tominaga, T. Watanabe, T. Arakawa, declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiro Fujiwara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujiwara, Y., Kohata, Y., Tanigawa, T. et al. Associations between endoscopic findings and functional assessment via multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring in patients with non-erosive reflux disease refractory to proton-pump inhibitors. Esophagus 12, 244–250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-014-0480-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-014-0480-2

Keywords

Navigation