Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal micro-incision versus small-incision cataract surgery

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We sought to examine changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the immediate period after clear corneal micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS) and after small-incision cataract surgery (SICS).

Methods

Sixty-eight eyes of 34 patients scheduled for coaxial phacoemulsification were randomized into one of two groups: (a) eyes that were to undergo a 2.0-mm MICS, and (b) a 2.65-mm SICS. At the conclusion of surgery, the IOP was adjusted to the range between 15–40 mmHg with stromal hydration. The IOP was measured using a rebound tonometer preoperatively, at the conclusion of surgery, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 min postoperatively. The Seidel test and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography were performed at 20 min postoperatively.

Results

Mean IOP at the conclusion of surgery was 27.7 ± 4.7 mmHg in the MICS group and 29.7 ± 5.1 mmHg in the SICS group (p = 0.1239). In both groups, mean IOP decreased to the preoperative level within 9 min postoperatively and did not change significantly for up to 15 min. Mean IOP was similar between the MICS and SICS groups throughout the observation period (p ≥ 0.1239). Hypotony (≤10 mmHg), positive Seidel test, and loss of wound coaptation were not detected in all eyes.

Conclusions

After adjusting the IOP to a relatively high level at the conclusion of surgery, the IOP decreased within 9 min and was stable within 15 min without hypotony. The IOP was comparable between eyes after MICS and SICS, and both incisions virtually closed within 20 min postoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper BA, Holekamp NM, Bohgian G, Thompson PA. Case-control study of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery comparing scleral tunnel and clear corneal wounds. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, Nobe MY, Saedi G, Sweet PM, et al. Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. West ES, Behrens A, McDonnell PJ, Tielsch JM, Schein OD. The incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery among the U.S. Medicare population increased between 1994 and 2001. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1388–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarayba MA, Taban M, Ignacio TS, Behrens A, McDonnell PJ. Inflow of ocular surface fluid through clear corneal cataract incisions: a laboratory model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herretes S, Stark WJ, Pirouzmanesh A, Reyes JM, McDonnell PJ, Behrens A. Inflow of ocular surface fluid into the anterior chamber after phacoemulsification through sutureless corneal wounds. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:737–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chawdhary S, Anand A. Early post-phacoemulsification hypotony as a risk factor for intraocular contamination: in vivo model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:609–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. May W, Castro-Combs J, Camacho W, Wittmann P, Behrens A. Analysis of clear corneal incision integrity in an ex vivo model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1013–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berdahl JP, DeStafeno JJ, Kim T. Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification: evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:510–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Behrens A, Stark WJ, Pratzer KA, McDonnell PJ. Dynamics of small-incision clear corneal wounds after phacoemulsification surgery using optical coherence tomography in the early postoperative period. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:46–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Calladine D, Packard R. Clear corneal incision architecture in the immediate postoperative period evaluated using optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calladine D, Tanner V. Optical coherence tomography of the effects of stromal hydration on clear corneal incision architecture. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1367–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McDonnell PJ, Taban M, Sarayba M, Rao B, Zhang J, Schiffman R, et al. Dynamic morphology of clear corneal cataract incisions. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ki-I Y, Yamashita T, Uemura A, Sakamoto T. Long-term intraocular pressure changes after combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shingleton BJ, Wadhwani RA, O’Donoghue MW, Baylus S, Hoey H. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate period after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:524–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhee DJ, Derano VA, Connolly BP, Blecher MH. Intraocular pressure trends after supranormal pressurization to aid closure of sutureless cataract wounds. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:546–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Yoshimura K. Effect of high pressurization versus normal pressurization on changes in intraocular pressure immediately after celar corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olson RJ. Clinical experience with 21-gauge manual microphacoemulsification using Sovereign WhiteStar technology in eyes with dense cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:168–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavallini GM, Campi L, Masini C, Pelloni S, Pupino A. Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:387–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dosso AA, Cottet L, Burgener ND, Di Nardo S. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:284–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alió J, Rodriquez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1997–2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1818–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yao K, Tang X, Ye P. Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:1079–82.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H. Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:233–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng B, Liu Y, Liu Y, Xie BB, Xi L, Yang Y. Early changes in morphology and intraocular pressure by size of clear corneal incision. Cornea. 2011;30:634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kontia AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:142–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:332–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Davies LN, Barlett H, Mallen EAH, Wolffsohn JS. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:206–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, Yildirim N. Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:185–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scuderi GL, Cascone NC, Regine F, Perdicchi A, Cerulli A, Recupero SM. Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21:251–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank SciTechEdit International (Highlands Ranch, CL, USA) for editorial assistance and Masahiro Toda, PhD (CMIC Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) for statistical assistance.

Conflicts of interest

K. Hayashi, Grants (Alcon Japan, Santen), Speakers bureau fee (Alcon); M. Yoshida, Grants (Alcon Japan, Santen), Speakers bureau fee (Alcon); K. Yoshimura, Grants (Alcon Japan, Santen).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Hayashi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi, K., Yoshida, M. & Yoshimura, K. Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal micro-incision versus small-incision cataract surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 58, 402–408 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0331-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0331-7

Keywords

Navigation