Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Abdominal wall mesh infection: a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart proposal

  • review
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Since there is still no univocal codified treatment for mesh infection or fistulization following abdominal wall repair, the aim of this study is to propose a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart based on personal experience and literature review.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 12 patients who developed mesh infection or enterocutaneous fistulas after mesh implantation for abdominal wall hernias. Patients had had different types of mesh implanted: 6 polypropylene meshes, 3 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) meshes, 2 dual mesh, and 1 polyester mesh. Based on our experience and literature review, we extrapolated a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart.

Results

The clinical course and results of treatment were heterogeneous in this group of patients. Four patients (33%) underwent fistulectomy with excision of the fistulous canal in association with removal of the infected mesh. One patient (9%) underwent fistulectomy with partial removal of the polypropylene mesh and resection of the affected tract of the ileum. Five patients (42%) underwent excision of the infected mesh. Conservative treatment was resolutive in two cases (16%). Of the 10 cases with a surgical procedure, in two cases a conservative approach with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was initially adopted; this approach may have reduced the invasiveness of the surgical procedure. Three patients (25%) experienced a chronic fistula, nine patients (75%) healed and showed no recurrence after a mean follow-up of 18 months.

Conclusion

The approach to mesh fistulization should be tailored to every single patient. In the majority of cases, a multistep approach seems to be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mavros MN, Athanasiou S, Alexiou VG, Mitsikostas PK, Peppas G, Falagas ME. Risk factors for mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. World J Surg. 2011;35(11):2389–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1266-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung L, Tse GH, O’Dwyer PJ. Outcome of patients with chronic mesh infection following abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2014;18(5):701–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1277-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bueno-Lledó J, Torregrosa-Gallud A, Carreño-Saénz O, García-Pastor P, Carbonell-Tatay F, Bonafé-Diana S, et al. Partial versus complete removal of the infected mesh after abdominal wall hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2017;214(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pérez-Köhler B, Bayon Y, Bellón JM. Mesh infection and hernia repair: a review. Surg Infect. 2016;17(2):124–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2015.078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy S, Moszkowicz D, Poghosyan T, Beauchet A, Chandeze M‑M, Vychnevskaia K, et al. Comparison of complete versus partial mesh removal for the treatment of chronic mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2018;22(5):773–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1785-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Engelsman AF, Van Der MHC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ. Morphological aspects of surgical meshes as a risk factor for bacterial colonization. Br J Surg. 2008;95(8):1051–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stephenson BM. Complications of open groin hernia repairs. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(5):1255–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00128-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: Inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1561–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Birolini C, de Miranda JS, Utiyama EM, Rasslan S. A retrospective review and observations over a 16-year clinical experience on the surgical treatment of chronic mesh infection. What about replacing a synthetic mesh on the infected surgical field? Hernia. 2015;19(2):239–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1225-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tolino MJ, Tripoloni DE, Ratto R, García MI. Infections associated with prosthetic repairs of abdominal wall hernias: pathology, management and results. Hernia. 2009;13(6):631–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0541-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stremitzer S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gradl B, Gruenbeck M, Bachleitner-Hofmann B, Mittlboeck M, et al. Mesh graft infection following abdominal hernia repair: Risk factor evaluation and strategies of mesh graft preservation. A retrospective analysis of 476 operations. World J Surg. 2010;34(7):1702–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0543-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabbagh C, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, Browet F, Garriot B, Regimbeau JM. Partial removal of infected parietal meshes is a safe procedure. Hernia. 2012;16(4):445–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0931-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM, Aii L. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157(2):188–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Basile F, Biondi A, Donati M. Surgical approach to abdominal wall defects: history and new trends. Int J Surg. 2013;11(S1):S20–S3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1743-9191(13)60008-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schumpelick V, Klinge U. Prosthetic implants for hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1457–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1(2):70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN. Prosthetic mesh materials used in hernia surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9(2):159–79. https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.11.65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson TN, Clarke JH, Schoen J, Walsh MD. Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the food and drug administration. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2005;19(12):1556–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0120-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bilsel Y, Abci I. The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types. Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):317–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang Z, Ren F, Zhou J, Tian J. Biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. J Surg. 2015;85(12):910–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huntington CR, Cox TC, Blair LJ, Schell S, Randolph D, Prasad T, et al. Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis. Surgery. 2016;160(6):1517–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosen MJ, Bauer JJ, Harmaty M, Carbonell AM, Cobb WS, Matthews B, et al. Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: the COBRA study. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu Y, Fu S, Zhou S, Chen G, Zhu C, Li N, et al. Preparation and biocompatibility evaluation of polypropylene mesh coated with electrospinning membrane for pelvic defects repair. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;81:142–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leberfinger AN, Hospodiuk M, Pena-Francesch A, Ayan B, Ozbolat V, Koduru SV, et al. Squid ring teeth-coated mesh improves abdominal wall repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(8):e1881. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001881.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Tache-Leon CA, Hallowell PT, Sawyer RG, Yang Z. Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? Surg Endosc. 2018;32(4):2131–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5911-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhong C, Wu B, Yang Z, Deng X, Kang J, Guo B, et al. A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2013;20(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350612463444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boullenois H, Moszkowicz D, Poghosyan T. Surgical management of chronic mesh. J Visc Surg. 2016;153(6):461–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kao AM, Arnold MR, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Prevention and treatment strategies for mesh infection in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3S):149S–55S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiang S. Prevention of patch infection after abdominal external hernia repair. Infect. 2019;7(3):75–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/ii-2018-0024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Birolini C, de Miranda JS, Tanaka EY, Utiyama EM, Rasslan S, Birolini D. The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma—a long-term prospective clinical trial. Hernia. 2020;24(2):307–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02035-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Donati M, Brancato G, Grosso G, Volti LG, La Camera G, Cardì F, et al. Immunological reaction and oxidative stress after light or heavy polypropylene mesh implantation in inguinal hernioplasty: a CONSORT-prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Medicine. 2016;95(24):e3791. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Metcalf C. Considerations for the management of enterocutaneous fistula. Gastrointest Nurs. 2019;17(4):36–42. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.5.S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu X, Ren J, Wang G, Wang J, Wang F, Fan Y, et al. Evaluating the use of fibrin glue for sealing low-output enterocutaneous fistulas: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0966-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Delikoukos S, Tzovaras G, Liakou P, Mantzos F, Hatzitheofilou C. Late-onset deep mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2007;11(1):15–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0131-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bliziotis IA, Kasiakou SK, Kapaskelis AM, Falagas ME. Mesh-related infection after hernia repair: case report of an emerging type of foreign-body related infection. Infection. 2006;34(1):46–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-006-4140-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Genc V, Ensari C, Ergul Z, Kulacoglu H. A very late-onset deep infection after prosthetic inguinal hernia repair. Chirurgia. 2010;105(4):555–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gandolfo L, Donati M, Palmeri S, Brancato G, Donati A. Insorgenza tardiva di fistola cutanea dopo ernioplastica inguinale protesica. Caso clinico. Ann Ital Chir. 2006;77(5):447–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guillaume O, Pérez-Tanoira R, Fortelny R, Redl H, Moriarty TF, Richards RG, et al. Infections associated with mesh repairs of abdominal wall hernias: are antimicrobial biomaterials the longed-for solution? Biomaterials. 2018;167:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson HBG, Boling LR. The anachoretic effect in pulpitis I. bacteriologic studies. J Am Dent Assoc. 1941;28(2):268–82. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1941.0052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gutmann JL, Manjarrés V. Historical and contemporary perspectives on the microbiological aspects of endodontics. Dent J. 2018; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj6040049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rodriguez Cano AM. Nutrition therapy in enterocutaneous fistula; from physiology to individualized treatment. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2014.29.1.6891.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Amodeo C, Caglià P, Gandolfo L, Veroux M, Brancato G, Donati M. Role of nutritional support in the treatment of enteric fistulas. Chir Ital. 2002;54(3):379–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dárdai E, Pirityi S, Nagy L. Parenteral and enteral nutrition and the enterocutaneous fistula treatment. II. Factors influencing the outcome of treatment. Acta Chir Hung. 1991;32(4):305–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Candela G, Di Libero L, Varriale S, Manetta F, Giordano M, Lanza M, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for entero-cutaneous fistulas. Personal experience and literature review. Minerva Chir. 2007;62(4):293–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dárdai E, Pirityi S, Nagy L. Parenteral and enteral nutrition and the enterocutaneous fistula treatment. I. Investigations on fistula output, nutritional status complications. Acta Chir Hung. 1991;32(4):287–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Moreno-Serrano A, García-Díaz JJ, Ferrer-Márquez M, Alarcón-Rodríguez R, Álvarez-García A, Reina-Duarte Á. Using autologous platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of complex fistulas. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016;108(3):123–8. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2016.3946/2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Prof. Lynn Patricia Bulmer (Cambridge Assessor and Editor for the Oxford University Press) for the linguistic review and supervision of the present article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgical Clinic Unit. Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78 CT, 95123, Catania, Italy

    Michela Zanatta MD, Francesco Basile MD, PhD & Marcello Donati MD, PhD

  2. Emergency and Abdominal Surgery Unit. Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy

    Giovanna Brancato MD, PhD & Guido Basile MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Michela Zanatta MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanna Brancato MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guido Basile MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesco Basile MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcello Donati MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michela Zanatta MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Zanatta, G. Brancato, G. Basile, F. Basile, and M. Donati declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zanatta, M., Brancato, G., Basile, G. et al. Abdominal wall mesh infection: a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart proposal. Eur Surg 54, 6–16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00705-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00705-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation