Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landslides: A state-of-the art on the current position in the landslide research community

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The international journal Landslides (ISSN 1612-510X), launched in 2004 and published by Springer Verlag, soon gained international recognition as the only specialized scientific journal in the world dedicated to different aspects of landslides, and as one of the leading world journals in the field of geological engineering. After 7 years, seven published volumes with 28 issues and 290 published papers on 2,794 pages, there is time to make a comparison with other related journals that also cover the field of landslide risk mitigation. The critical review of these seven publishing years was done using ISI Journal Citation Reports produced by Thomson Reuters, and available scientometric data from the ISI Web of Knowledge and SCOPUS. The data presented in this paper and the analysis shown may help the Editorial Board to further improve the journal into the direction of a high quality scientific journal with even higher impact on the international research community in the field of landslide risk mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Andrade A, González-Jonte R, Campanario JM (2009) Journals that increase their impact factor at least fourfold in a few years: the role of journal self-citations. Scientometrics 80(2):515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks D, Younger PL, Arnesen RT, Iversen ER, Banks SB (1997) Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Environ Geol 32(3):157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswajeet P, Saied P (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Advances 3(3):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanario JM, Molina A (2009) Surviving bad times: the role of citations, self-citations and numbers of citable items in recovery of the journal impact factor after at least four years of continuous decreases. Scientometrics 81(3):859–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli M, Scavia C, Bonnard C, Laloui L (2009) Preface: mechanics and velocity of large landslides. Eng Geol 109(1–2):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox SC, Allen SK (2009) Vampire rock avalanches of January 2008 and 2003, Southern Alps, New Zealand. Landslides 6(2):161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fookes PG (1997) Geology for engineers: the geological model, prediction and performance. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 30(4):293–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund DG, Xing AQ (1994) Equations for the soil–water characteristic curve. Can Geotech J 31(4):521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Sezer E (2009) A statistical assessment on international landslide literature (1945–2008). Landslides 6:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo QL, Wang XD, Zhang HY, Li ZX, Yang SL (2009) Damage and conservation of the high cliff on the Northern area of Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes, China. Landslides 6(2):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1–4):181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46):16569–16572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Bovis MJ, Hutchinson JN (2001) A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environ Eng Geosci 7(3):221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • ISI Web of Knowledge, The Thomson Reuters. Available at: http://apps.isiknowledge.com/ (accessed July 2011)

  • Keller EA, Swanson FJ (1979) Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 4(4):361–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom K, Larsson R, Dahlin T (2009) Mapping of quick clay formations using geotechnical and geophysical methods. Landslides 6(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini F, Ceppi C, Ritrovato G (2010) GIS and statistical analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Daunia area, Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10(9):1851–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Jha VK, Rawat GS (2009) Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping and its validation in part of Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, India, using binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve method. Landslides 6(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrouli O, Corominas J (2010a) Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings to damage by rockfalls. Landslides 7(2):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrouli O, Corominas J (2010b) Rockfall vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10(10):2055–2066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Kreibich H, Thieken A, Schmidtke R (2004) Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 4(1):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikos M, Petkovsek A, Majes B (2009) Mechanisms of landslides in over-consolidated clays and flysch—activity scale and targeted region: national. Landslides 6(4):367–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geol 60(1–4):193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picarelli L, Zeni L (2009) Discussion on “Test on application of distributed fibre optic sensing technique into soil slope monitoring” by BJ Wang, K. Li, B. Shi and GQ Wei. Landslides 6(4):361–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010a) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 38(2):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010b) Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3(3):370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 7(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modeling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010a) A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 34(3):216–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010b) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(12):4164–4177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudovkin AI, Garfield E (2002) Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 53(13):1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Carmichael G (2008) Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat Geosci 1(4):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenmann D (1999) Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards 19(1):47–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) (2005) Landslides: risk analysis and sustainable disaster management. Springer Verlag, Berlin, p 385

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) (2007) Progress in landslide science. Springer Verlag, Berlin, p 378

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K, Tsuchiya S, Ugai K, Wakai A, Uchimura T (2009) Landslides: a review of achievements in the first 5 years (2004–2009). Landslides 6:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K (2009) Report of the 2008 First World Landslide Forum on 18–21 November 2008 at UNU, Tokyo. Landslides 6(3):167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K (2010) Aim, categories of articles and thematic issues of “landslides”. Landslides 7:215–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz WH, McKenna JP, Kibler JD, Biavati G (2009a) Relations between hydrology and velocity of a continuously moving landslide-evidence of pore-pressure feedback regulating landslide motion? Landslides 6(3):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz WH, Kean JW, Wang GH (2009b) Landslide movement in southwest Colorado triggered by atmospheric tides. Nat Geosci 2(12):863–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters (2011) Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_self_citation_jcr/ Accessed 4 July 2011

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Special report 176: landslides: analysis and control, TRB. National Research Council, Washington, pp 11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang BJ, Li K, Shi B, Wei GQ (2009a) Test on application of distributed fiber optic sensing technique into soil slope monitoring. Landslides 6(1):61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang BL, Paudel B, Li HQ (2009b) Retrogression characteristics of landslides in fine-grained permafrost soils, Mackenzie Valley, Canada. Landslides 6(2):121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willenberg H, Eberhardt E, Loew S, McDougall S, Hungr O (2009) Hazard assessment and runout analysis for an unstable rock slope above an industrial site in the Riviera valley, Switzerland. Landslides 6(2):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin YP, Wang FW, Sun P (2009) Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China. Landslides 6(2):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin YP, Wang HD, Gao YL, Li XC (2010) Real-time monitoring and early warning of landslides at relocated Wushan Town, the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Landslides 7(3):339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127(10):817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DX, Wang GH, Luo CY, Chen J, Zhou YX (2009) A rapid loess flowslide triggered by irrigation in China. Landslides 6(1):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang TT, Yan EC, Cheng JT, Zheng Y (2010) Mechanism of reservoir water in the deformation of Hefeng landslide. Journal of Earth Science 21(6):870–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper was substantially stimulated by personal talks to different board members of the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL) on several occasions when we met and were discussing the positioning of Landslides in the landslide research community.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matjaž Mikoš.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikoš, M. Landslides: A state-of-the art on the current position in the landslide research community. Landslides 8, 541–551 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0297-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0297-1

Keywords

Navigation