Abstract
Hunting in Spain represents an imperfect market in which some hunters pay a price that is below what would be paid or they simply do not pay a market price. This article evidences the welfare that hunting activities provide to hunters in the forests of southern Spain. To do so, a contingent valuation survey of 557 hunters was conducted, and their maximum willingness to pay (WTP) to maintain their hunting activity over a hunting season was obtained. Bids were established according to the individual expenditure in the hunting market, thereby incorporating heterogeneity into the very design of the valuation exercise. The results show an additional WTP of 212 euros per hunter during the 2009–2010 hunting season, meaning 24% above their actual mean expenditure during that season. Likewise, the research shows how small game hunters are the ones who, in relative terms, would be willing to pay more for the hunting services.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
If we take the median as the reference, general expenses for hunting would be 385 euros per hunter.
If we take the median as the reference, recreational hunting expenses would amount to 400 euros per hunter.
Note that with the collected information, we cannot classify 30 hunters, given that they did not specify if they participated in small and/or big game hunting.
References
Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Özdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Bishop RC, Heberlein TA (1979) Measuring the values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased. Am J Agric Econ 61:926–930
Boman M, Mattsson L, Ericsson G, Kriström B (2011) Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: the Swedish hunters revisited. Environ Resour Econ 50(4):515–530
Delibes-Mateos M, Giergiczny M, Caro J, Viñuela J, Riera P, Arroyo B (2014) Does hunters’ willingness to pay match the best hunting options for biodiversity conservation? A choice experiment application for small-game hunting in Spain. Biol Conserv 177:36–42
Duffield J, Neher C (1991) A contingent valuation assessment of Montana waterfowl hunting: hunter attitudes and economic benefits. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Bioeconomics, Inc, Missoula
Goodwin BK, Offenback LA, Cable TT, Cook PS (1993) Discrete/continuous valuation of private hunting access in Kansas. J Environ Manag 39(1):1–12
Hanemann WM (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 66:332–341
Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M, Greene, W.H. (2015). Applied choice analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. 1188 pp
Kerr GN, Abell W (2016) What are they hunting for? Investigating heterogeneity among sika deer (Cervus nippon) hunters. Wildl Res 43(1):69–79
Kinnell J, Lazo JK, Epp DJ, Fisher A, Shortle JS (2002) Perceptions and values for preventing ecosystem change: Pennsylvania duck hunters and the Prairie Pothole Region. Land Econ 78(2):228–244
Lee HC, Chun HS (1999) Valuing environmental quality change on recreational hunting in Korea: a contingent valuation analysis. J Environ Manag 57(1):11–20
Loomis J, Pierce C, Manfredo M (2000) Using the demand for hunting licences to evaluate contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay. Appl Econ Lett 7(7):435–438
Loureiro ML, Loomis JB, Vázquez MX (2009) Economic valuation of environmental damages due to the Prestige oil spill in Spain. Environ Resour Econ 44(4):537–553
Martínez-Jauregui M, Herruzo C, Campos P (2015) What does hunting market price reflect? The role of species, landscape and management. Wildl Res 42:280–289
Martínez-Jauregui M, Herruzo AC, Campos P, Soliño M (2016) Shedding light on the self-consumption value of recreational hunting in European Mediterranean forests. Forest Policy Econ 63:83–89
Mattsson L (1990a) Moose management and the economic value of hunting: towards bioeconomic analysis. Scand J For Res 5(1–4):575–581
Mattsson L (1990b) Hunting in Sweden: extent, economic values and structural problems. Scand J For Res 5(1–4):563–573
Mingie JC, Poudval NC, Bowker JM, Mengak MT, Siry JP (2017a) Big game hunter preferences for hunting club attributes: a choice experiment. Forest Policy Econ 78:98–106
Mingie JC, Poudval NC, Bowker JM, Mengak MT, Siry JP (2017b) A hedonic analysis of big game hunting club dues in Georgia, USA. Hum Dimens Wildl 22(2):110–125
Munn I, Hussain A, Hudson D, West BC (2011) Hunter preferences and willingness to pay for hunting leases. For Sci 57(3):189–200
Soliño M, Farizo BA, Campos P (2016) Hunters’ preferences and willingness to pay for driven hunts in Southern Europe. Wildl Res 43(8):649–654
Acknowledgements
This article is the result of the RECAMAN project (Renta y Capital de los Montes de Andalucía). The authors would like to thank the Regional Government of Andalucía for the contributed financing (contract number NET165602) and for the information provided about hunting licenses. Likewise, various researchers cooperated on designing the questionnaire and the simulated markets. They include José L. Oviedo and Alejandro Caparrós (IPP-CSIC), Juan Carranza (CRCP), Casimiro Herruzo (ECSEN-UPM), and María Martínez-Jauregui (INIA-CIFOR). Moreover, assistance and advising were provided by experts. They include experts on social research techniques from IESA-CSIC (Carmela Gutiérrez, Sara Pasadas, Carlos Priego, and Marga Zarco), experts on hunting from AMAyA (Paulino Fandos and Luis Guzmán), and experts from the Regional Government of Andalucía (Rafael Cadenas).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soliño, M., Farizo, B.A. & Campos, P. Behind the economics of hunting in Andalusian forests. Eur J Wildl Res 63, 47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-017-1103-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-017-1103-8