Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Socioeconomic and environmental risk factors for urban rodent infestation in Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides analyses of data on the premises infestation by commensal rodents collected during the 2006 Urban Rodent Survey, in Sao Paulo city, Brazil. A two-stage cluster sample survey was used to visit 23,512 premises, and logistic regression models were estimated in order to understand the relationships among the risk factors and the infestation probability. The premises infestation rates were 23.1% for all rodents, 12.7% for roof rat, 9.4% for Norway rat and 1.7% for house mouse. Factors found to be related to infestation levels were: socioeconomic conditions (human development index and income), premises features (commercial, strictly residential and vacant lots), and environmental resources (access, harborage and food). The analysis of odds ratios showed that access by the building structure favours roof rat and access by the sewage system favours Norway rat. Harborage in ceiling cracks are determinant for roof rat, harborage in wall cracks and in dense bush for Norway rat, and harborage in waste or in building material for house mouse infestations. Available animal food favour all the three species, fruit trees favour Norway and roof rats, human food is important for house mouse: therefore a natural partition of the environmental resources among the species was observed. The results obtained in this article add some knowledge on the biology and behaviour of commensal rodents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves MCM (1990) The biology and control of Rattus rattus (Linneus, 1758). Dissertation, University of Reading

  • Amarasekare P (2003) Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Eco Lett 6:1109–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajomi D, Sasvari K (1986) Results of eight years’ examination of the habitats of residual urban Norway rat populations after eradication. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Available via DIALOG. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=vpc12. Accessed 20 Aug 2009

  • Battersby S, Parsons R, Webster JP (2002) Urban rat infestation and the risk to public health. J Environ Health Res 1(2):4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmain SR, Meyer AN, Penicela L, Xavier R (2002) Population management of rodent pests through intensive trapping inside rural households in Mozambique. Available via DIALOG. http://www.icup.org.uk/reports/ICUP247.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2008

  • Bevillacqua PD, Carmo RF, Silva JCP, Giudice GML (2004) Roedores inventariados em hospital veterinário e fragmento de mata nativa da Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais, Brasil: caracterização populacional e infecção por Leptospira sp. Ciênc Rural 34:1519–1523 (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradman A, Chevrier J, Tager I, Lipsett M, Sedgwick J, Macher J, Vargas AB, Cabrera EB, Camacho JM, Weldon R, Kogut K, Jewell NP, Eskenazi B (2005) Association of housing disrepair indicators with cockroach and rodent infestation in a cohort of pregnant Latina women and their children. Environ Health Perspect 113:1795–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2002) Demographic census 2000. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Camero CL, Gómez WE, Cáceres JL (2004) Infestación por roedores en inmuebles de Tumero, Estado Aragua, Venezuela, 2001. Bol Malariol Salud Ambient 44(1):29–33 (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavia R, Cueto GR, Suárez OV (2009) Changes in rodent communities according to the landscape structure in an urban ecosystem. Landsc Urban Plan 90:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control, Prevention (2006) Integrated pest management: conducting urban rodent surveys. US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Channon D, Channon E, Roberts T, Haines R (2006) Hotspots: are some areas of sewer network prone to re-infestation by rats (Rattus norvegicus) year after year? Epidemiol Infect 134:41–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Childs JE, McLafferty SL, Sadek R, Miller GL, Khan AS, Dupree ER, Advani R, Glass GE (1998) Epidemiology of rodent bites and prediction of rat infestation in New York City. Am J Epidemiol 148:78–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • COVISA (2006) Health surveillance coordination, Municipal health secretary. Municipal Government of Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Casta A, Schatz G (1977) Urban rat surveys. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Atlanta. Public Health Service. (CDC 77-8344)

  • DEFRA Department for Environmental Food and Rural Affairs (2005) Rodent infestation in domestic properties in England, 2001: a report arising from the 2001 English House Condition Survey, UK. Available via DIALOG. http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/englishhousesurveyrodentreport_tcm6-4624.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2006

  • Duplantier J-M, Catalan J, Orth A, Grolleau B, Briton-Davidian J (2003) Systematic of the black rat in Madagascar: consequences for the transmission and distribution of plague. Biol J Linn Soc 78:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook JD, Kaplan JB, Vanasco NB, Reeves WK, Purcell RH, Kosoy MY, Glass GE, Watson J, Klein SL (2007) A survey of zoonotic pathogens carried by Norway rats in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Epidemiol Infect 135:1192–1199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukeinen D (1994) Rodent control in practice: householders, pest control operators and municipal authorities. In: Buckle AP, Smith RH (eds) Rodent pests and their control. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 249–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish L (1965) Survey sampling. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambropoulos AS, Fine JB, Perbeck A, Torres D, Glass GE, McHugh P, Dorsey EA (1999) Rodent control in urban areas: an interdisciplinary approach. J Environ Health 61(6):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton SD, Cowan DP, Meyer AN (2001) The occurrence of commensal rodents in dwellings as revealed by the 1996 English House Conditions Survey. J Appl Ecol 38:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leirs H, Lodal J, Knorr M (2004) Factors correlated with the presence of rodents on outdoor pig farms in Denmark and suggestions for management strategies. NJAS 52:145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung LK–P, Clark NM (2005) Bait avoidance and habitat use by the roof rat, Rattus rattus, in a piggery. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 55:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund M (1994) Commensal rodents. In: Buckle AP, Smith RH (eds) Rodent pests and their control. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 23–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Masi E, Vilaça PJ, Razzolini MTP (2009) Environmental factors and rodent infestation in Campo Limpo District, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Int. J Environ Health Res 19:1–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire B, Pizzuto T, Bemis WE, Getz LL (2006) General ecology of a rural population of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) based on intensive live trapping. The Am Midl Nat 155:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan AP (1984) Rats and mice: their biology and control. Rentokil, Felcourt

    Google Scholar 

  • Moojen J (1952) Os roedores do Brasil. Ministério da Educação e Saúde, Instituto Nacional do Livro, Rio de Janeiro (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy RG, Marshall PA (2003) House conditions and the likelihood of domestic rodent infestation in an inner city area of Manchester. Available via DIALOG. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/events/past/2003/healthyhousing/papers/marshall.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2008

  • Nowak RM (1991) Walker’s mammals of the world, 5th edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranhos NT (2002) Estudo das populações canina e felina em domicílio, município de São Paulo, 2001. Dissertation, University of Sao Paulo (in Portuguese)

  • Parshad VR (2004) Rodent control in India. Integr Pest Manag Rev 4:97–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroso MM (2003) Desenvolvimento humano no município de São Paulo: uma cartografia socioeconômica como contribuição ao planejamento de políticas públicas. Dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (in Portuguese)

  • Pino FA (2007) Binary decision models: a review. J Agric Econ 54:43–57 (in Portuguese, ISSN 1981-4771)

    Google Scholar 

  • Promkerd P, Khoprasert Y, Virathavone P, Thoummabouth M, Sirisak O, Jäkel T (2008) Factors explaining the abundance of rodents in the city of Luang Prabang, Lao PDR, as revealed by field and household surveys. Integr Zool 3:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel JC, Clout MN (2004) Modelling the distribution and interaction of introduced rodents on New Zealand offshore island. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos MGS, Masi E, Ribeiro GC, Pregun MA, Dicezare BJ, Ribeiro AEF, Albuquerque JOM, Alves JCM, Garcia NO (2006) Índice de infestação predial por roedores na Cidade de São Paulo em 2005. In: Annals of VIII Brazilian Congress of Collective Health and XI World Congress of Collective Health. ABRASCO, Rio de Janeiro. CD-ROM—VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Saúde Coletiva (in Portuguese)

  • SAS Institute (2009). The LOGISTIC procedure. In: SAS/STAT user’s guide. Available http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/59654/HTML/default/logistic_toc.htm. Accessed 21 Jul 2009

  • Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Sci 185(4145):27–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shtatland ES, Moore S, Barton MB (2000) Why we need an R2 measure of fit (and not only one) in Proc Logistic and Proc Genmod. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual SAS® users group international conference, Indianapolis, IN. Available http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi25/25/st/25p256.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2009

  • Silva EA, Tsuyako YO, Matsuo M, Daud E, Villanova A (1992) Controle de roedores no Vale do Rio Aricanduva. Bol Inf Control Zoonoses Urbanas 15(1–2):25–35 (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ, Arntzen L, Hayter M, Iles M, Frean J, Belmain S (2008) Understanding and managing sanitary risks due to rodent zoonoses in an African city: beyond the Boston Model. Integr Zoolog 3:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traweger D, Slotta-Bachmayr L (2005) Introducing GIS-modelling into the management of a brown rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) (Mamm. Rodentia Muridae) population in an urban habitat. J Pest Sci 78:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traweger D, Travnitzky R, Moser C, Walzer C, Bernatzky G (2006) Habitat preferences and distribution of the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) in the city of Salzburg (Austria): implications for an urban rat management. J Pest Sci 79:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Municipal Health Department, Municipal Government of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Eduardo Masi, Maria das Graças S. Santos, Ludvig Genehr, José Olímpio M. Albuquerque, Andréa M. Bancher & Julio Cesar M. Alves

  2. Biological Institute, State Government of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Francisco A. Pino

Authors
  1. Eduardo Masi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco A. Pino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria das Graças S. Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ludvig Genehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. José Olímpio M. Albuquerque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andréa M. Bancher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Julio Cesar M. Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Masi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masi, E., Pino, F.A., Santos, M.d.G.S. et al. Socioeconomic and environmental risk factors for urban rodent infestation in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Pest Sci 83, 231–241 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-010-0290-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-010-0290-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation