Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of different neem preparations in comparison to synthetic insecticides on the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia sophia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on cotton under laboratory conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contact and feeding toxicity of NeemAzal T/S (EID Parry, Chennai, India) to the parasitoid Encarsia sophia (Girault & Dodd) was compared with three synthetic insecticides (chlorpyriphos, endosulfan and triazophos) against immatures and adult emergence. NeemAzal T/S (1.0%) at lower dose (200 mg/l) did not cause any effect on the emergence of E. sophia adults, but there was a significant reduction in emergence at higher doses (800 mg/l). Also, it did not show contact toxicity to adults of E. sophia, but there was a significantly high feeding mortality in a dosage dependant manner, whereas chlorpyriphos, endosulfan and triazophos showed high toxicity both by contact and feeding method. Three neem preparations registered in India, NeemAzal T/S, Nimbecidine (T. Stains, Coimbatore) and Godrej Achook (Godrej Agrovet, Mumbai) were tested against egg and larval stages of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) at three dosages, using a synthetic insecticide, triazophos 40 EC (200 mg/l), for comparison under laboratory conditions. The three biorationals did not induce any adverse effect on the hatchability of C. carnea eggs. The mortality of the first instars of C. carnea was not affected by any of the azadirachtin enriched formulations; however, at higher dosage of 800 mg/l these neem based products resulted in increased mortality of the first and second instar larvae of C. carnea relative to the untreated controls. Whereas, triazophos induced very high mortality rates (85.0, 89.0 and 81.5%) of all the three larval instars. The neem based insecticides showed a dosage-dependant effect on the larval instars of C. carnea. Thus, these biorationals show that there is a potential to use them in an IPM system, being safe for natural enemies of B. tabaci in cotton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrihotri NP, Walia S, Gajbhiye VT (1999) Green pesticides, crop protection and safety evaluation. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, p 253

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad G, Malik SA, Mamood Z, Iqbal MZ, Ahmad S, Ahmad S (2002) Effect of cotton leaf curl virus disease on morphology, yield and fibre characteristics of susceptible lines/cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Asian J Plant Sci 1:705–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Oßiewatsch HR, Basedow Th (2003) Effects of Neem-treated aphids as food/hosts on their predators and parasitoids. J Appl Ent 127:458–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antony B, Palaniswami MS (2003) Encarsia transvena (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) development on different Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) instars. Environ Entomol 32:584–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Basedow Th, Oßiewatsch HR, Bernal Vega JA, Kollmann S, El Shafie HAF, Nicol CMY (2002) Control of aphids and whiteflies (Homoptera: Aphididae and Aleyrodidae) with different neem preparations in laboratory, greenhouse and field: effects and limitations. J Plant Dis Prot 109:612–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Beevi SP, Balasubramanian M (1992) Relative safety of Buprofezin and insecticides to Encarsia shafeei a parasite of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). J Biol Control 6:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollhalder F, Zuber M (1996) NeemAzal T/S against Myzus persicae. In: Kleeberg H, Zebitz CPW (eds) Practice oriented results on use and production of neem-ingredients and pheromones. Proceedings of the 5th workshop, Wetzlar, Germany, 22–25 January 1996, pp 141–145

  • Briddon RW, Markham PG (2000) Cotton leaf virus disease. Virus Res 71:151–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema HS, Singh B (1990) A user’s manual to CPCS1. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudriet DL, Prabhakar N, Meyerdirk DE (1985) Sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): effects of neem-seed extract on oviposition and immature stages. Environ Entomol 14:776–779

    Google Scholar 

  • El Shafie HAF, Basedow Th (2003) The efficacy of different neem preparations for the control of insects damaging potatoes and eggplants in the Sudan. Crop Prot 22:1015–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Elling K, Borgemeister C, Sétamou M, Poehling H-M (2002) The effect of NeemAzal-T/S®, a commercial neem product, on different developmental stages of the common greenhose whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Hom., Aleyrodidae). J Appl Ent 126:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkegaard A (1993) Encarsia formosa parasitizing the poinsettia-strain of the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, on poinsettia; bionomics in relation to temperature. Entomol Exp Appl 63:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhege M, Schmutterer H (1993) Investigations on side effects of Margosan- O on Encarsia formosa Gah. (Hym., Aphelenidae), parasitoid of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westw. Hom., Aleyrodidae). J Appl Ent 115:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p 680

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelmer KA, Osborne LS, Yokomi RK (1990) Effect of neem extracts on beneficial insects in greenhouse culture. In: USDA neem workshop on neem’ s potential in pest management programs. USDA, Beltsville pp 100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi BG, Ramaprasad G, Sitaramaiah (1982) Effect of a neem based kernel suspension on Telenomus remus, an egg parasite of Spodoptera litura. Phytoparasitica 10:61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccloskey C, Arnason J T, Donskov N, Chenier R, Kaminski J, Philogene BJR (1993) Third trophic level effects of azadirachtin. Can Entomol 125:163–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medina P, Budia F, Tirry L, Smagghe G, Vinuela E (2001) Compatability of Spinosad, Tebufenozide and Azadirachtin with eggs and pupae of the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) under laboratory conditions. Biocontrol Sci Technol 11:597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra KN (1991) Current status of pesticide resistance in insect pest in India. J Insect Sci 4:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmutterer H (1990) Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachtin indica. Ann Rev Entomol 35:271–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster DJ, Stansly PA (2000) Response of two lacewing species to biorational and broad-spectrum insecticides. Phytoparasitica 28:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansly PA, Liu T-X (1997) Selectivity of insecticides to Encarsia pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), endoparasitoid of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull Entomol Res 87:525–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Völlinger M, Schmutterer H (2002) Development of resistance to azadirachtin and other neem ingredients. In: Schmutterer H (eds) The neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) and other meliaceous plants. Sources of unique natural products for integrated pest management, medicine, industry and other purposes, 2nd edn. Neem Foundation, Mumbai, pp 598–606

  • Wilkinson JD, Biever KD Ignoffo CM (1975) Contact toxicity of some chemical and biological pesticides to several insect parasitoids and predators. Entomophaga 20:113–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav DN, Patel AR (1990) Effect of some botanical insecticides on oviposition of Chrysoperla sceletes and their ovicidal action. In: Chari MS, Ramaprasad G (eds) Botanical pesticides in integrated pest management. Proceedings of Symposium Central Tobacco Research Institute, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India, June 1989, pp 166–169

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the research associates working in this research study, the staff of the Regional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Bathinda for their co-operation and technical assistance and also the industry representatives for supplying the chemicals. The manuscript was written during a stay of the first author at the Institute of Phytopathology and Applied Zoology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen (Germany). The authors are grateful to Professor Thies Basedow for reading the manuscript and for valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Aggarwal.

Additional information

Communicated by Jürgen Gross

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aggarwal, N., Brar, D.S. Effects of different neem preparations in comparison to synthetic insecticides on the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia sophia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on cotton under laboratory conditions. J Pest Sci 79, 201–207 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-006-0134-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-006-0134-9

Keywords

Navigation