Skip to main content
Log in

Is the reduced incubation time for B-eggs in Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome linked to egg density variation?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crested penguins (genus Eudyptes) present a unique reversed egg-size dimorphism and hatching asynchrony, with the larger second-laid egg (B-egg) hatching before the smaller first-laid egg (A-egg). Both a higher water vapour conductance and parental favouritism during incubation could explain the shorter incubation period for the B-egg than for the A-egg. Because the incubation period is increased by the presence of a sibling for A-eggs, but not for B-eggs, and because both egg categories have the same incubation period when they are incubated alone, it has been suggested that the difference in incubation period was largely driven by the parental favouritism for B-eggs during incubation. We tested whether A- and B-eggs show a difference in laying density, density at the beginning of incubation and in density decrease during incubation according to the presence of a sibling. Although density at the start of incubation was significantly higher for B-eggs than for A-eggs, the decrease in density during incubation had the same slope for both egg categories. Moreover, the presence of a sibling did not influence densities. We additionally provide two equations that allow the back-dating of laying dates for a clutch of SouthernRockhopper Penguin (Eudyptes c. chrysocome) and we discuss the precision of the method (3.04 ± 2.29 days for A-eggs and 2.73 ± 2.10 days for B-eggs) for penguins which are increasingly being used as marine environmental sentinels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boersma PD (2008) Penguins as marine sentinels. Bioscience 58:597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge ES, Boughton RK, Aldredge R, Harrison TJE, Bowman R, Schoech SJ (2007) Measuring egg size using digital photography: testing Hoyt’s method using Florida scrub-jay eggs. J Field Ornithol 78:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger AE, Williams AJ (1979) Egg temperatures of the rockhopper penguin and some other penguins. Auk 96:100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians JK (2002) Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev 77:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demongin L, Poisbleau M, Raya Rey A, Schiavini A, Quillfeldt P, Eens M, Strange IJ (2010) Geographical variation in egg size dimorphism in rockhopper penguins. Polar Biol 33:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW, Furness BL (1981) A technique for estimating the hatching dates of eggs of unknown laying date. Ibis 123:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwynn AM (1953) The egg-laying and incubation periods of rockhopper, macaroni and gentoo penguins. ANARE Rep Ser B 1:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt DF (1976) The effect of shape on the surface-volume relationships of birds’ eggs. Condor 78:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamey TC (1990) Hatch asynchrony and brood reduction in penguins. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic, San Diego, pp 399–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro M, Davis LS (2004) Preferential incubation positions for different sized eggs and their influence on incubation period and hatching asynchrony in Snares crested (Eudyptes robustus) and yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro M, Davis LS (2005) Differences in egg size, shell thickness, pore density, pore diameter and water vapour conductance between first and second eggs of Snares penguins Eudyptes robustus and their influence on hatching asynchrony. Ibis 147:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J, Barbosa A, Potti J, Merino S (1997) The effects of hatching date and parental quality on chick growth and creching age in the chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica): a field experiment. Auk 114:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paganelli CV, Olszowka A, Ar A (1974) The avian egg: surface area, volume, and density. Condor 76:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Strange IJ, Otley H, Quillfeldt P (2008) Aspects of the breeding biology of the southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes c. chrysocome and new consideration on the intrinsic capacity of the A-egg. Polar Biol 31:925–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Angelier F, Dano S, Lacroix A, Quillfeldt P (2009a) What ecological factors can affect albumen corticosterone levels in the clutches of seabirds? Timing of breeding, disturbance and laying order in rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome). Gen Comp Endocrinol 162:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Trouvé C, Quillfeldt P (2009b) Maternal deposition of yolk corticosterone in clutches of southern rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome). Horm Behav 55:500–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahn H, Ar A (1974) The avian egg: incubation time and water loss. Condor 76:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahn H, Hammel HT (1982) Incubation water loss, shell conductance, and pore dimensions in Adélie penguin eggs. Polar Biol 1:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn H, Paganelli CV (1989) The initial density of avian eggs derived from the tables of Schönwetter. J Ornithol 130:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raya Rey A, Trathan P, Schiavini A (2007) Inter-annual variation in provisioning behaviour of southern rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome at Staten Island, Argentina. Ibis 149:826–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St Clair CC (1998) What is the function of first eggs in crested penguins? Auk 115:478–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse B (1966) Egg volumes from linear dimensions. Emu 65:227–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik YM, Seddon PJ, du Plessis CJ, Adams NJ (1993) Differential growth of king penguin chicks in relation to date of hatching. Colonial Waterbirds 16:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viñuela J, Moreno J, Carrascal LM, Sanz JJ, Amat JA, Ferrer M, Belliure J, Cuervo JJ (1996) The effect of hatching date on parental care, chick growth, and chick mortality in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. J Zool 240:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warham J (1975) The crested penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. Macmillan, London, pp 189–269

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD (1995) The penguins. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the New Island Conservation Trust for permission to work on the island. We thank Maria and Georgina Strange and Dan Birch for their support during the field season. Thanks also to Helen Otley, Falkland Islands Government and British Antarctic Survey for their logistic help. The manuscript benefited greatly from critical comments by David Carslake and two anonymous reviewers. Our study was funded by a grant provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Qu 148/1-ff) and by the FWO Flanders, Belgium. All work was approved by the Falkland Islands Government (Environmental Planning Office).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maud Poisbleau.

Additional information

Communicated by P. H. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poisbleau, M., Demongin, L., Strange, I.J. et al. Is the reduced incubation time for B-eggs in Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome linked to egg density variation?. J Ornithol 152, 137–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0558-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0558-0

Keywords

Navigation