Abstract
Crested penguins (genus Eudyptes) present a unique reversed egg-size dimorphism and hatching asynchrony, with the larger second-laid egg (B-egg) hatching before the smaller first-laid egg (A-egg). Both a higher water vapour conductance and parental favouritism during incubation could explain the shorter incubation period for the B-egg than for the A-egg. Because the incubation period is increased by the presence of a sibling for A-eggs, but not for B-eggs, and because both egg categories have the same incubation period when they are incubated alone, it has been suggested that the difference in incubation period was largely driven by the parental favouritism for B-eggs during incubation. We tested whether A- and B-eggs show a difference in laying density, density at the beginning of incubation and in density decrease during incubation according to the presence of a sibling. Although density at the start of incubation was significantly higher for B-eggs than for A-eggs, the decrease in density during incubation had the same slope for both egg categories. Moreover, the presence of a sibling did not influence densities. We additionally provide two equations that allow the back-dating of laying dates for a clutch of SouthernRockhopper Penguin (Eudyptes c. chrysocome) and we discuss the precision of the method (3.04 ± 2.29 days for A-eggs and 2.73 ± 2.10 days for B-eggs) for penguins which are increasingly being used as marine environmental sentinels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boersma PD (2008) Penguins as marine sentinels. Bioscience 58:597–607
Bridge ES, Boughton RK, Aldredge R, Harrison TJE, Bowman R, Schoech SJ (2007) Measuring egg size using digital photography: testing Hoyt’s method using Florida scrub-jay eggs. J Field Ornithol 78:109–116
Burger AE, Williams AJ (1979) Egg temperatures of the rockhopper penguin and some other penguins. Auk 96:100–105
Christians JK (2002) Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev 77:1–26
Demongin L, Poisbleau M, Raya Rey A, Schiavini A, Quillfeldt P, Eens M, Strange IJ (2010) Geographical variation in egg size dimorphism in rockhopper penguins. Polar Biol 33:469–476
Furness RW, Furness BL (1981) A technique for estimating the hatching dates of eggs of unknown laying date. Ibis 123:98–102
Gwynn AM (1953) The egg-laying and incubation periods of rockhopper, macaroni and gentoo penguins. ANARE Rep Ser B 1:1–29
Hoyt DF (1976) The effect of shape on the surface-volume relationships of birds’ eggs. Condor 78:343–349
Lamey TC (1990) Hatch asynchrony and brood reduction in penguins. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic, San Diego, pp 399–416
Massaro M, Davis LS (2004) Preferential incubation positions for different sized eggs and their influence on incubation period and hatching asynchrony in Snares crested (Eudyptes robustus) and yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:426–434
Massaro M, Davis LS (2005) Differences in egg size, shell thickness, pore density, pore diameter and water vapour conductance between first and second eggs of Snares penguins Eudyptes robustus and their influence on hatching asynchrony. Ibis 147:251–258
Moreno J, Barbosa A, Potti J, Merino S (1997) The effects of hatching date and parental quality on chick growth and creching age in the chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica): a field experiment. Auk 114:47–54
Paganelli CV, Olszowka A, Ar A (1974) The avian egg: surface area, volume, and density. Condor 76:319–325
Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Strange IJ, Otley H, Quillfeldt P (2008) Aspects of the breeding biology of the southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes c. chrysocome and new consideration on the intrinsic capacity of the A-egg. Polar Biol 31:925–932
Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Angelier F, Dano S, Lacroix A, Quillfeldt P (2009a) What ecological factors can affect albumen corticosterone levels in the clutches of seabirds? Timing of breeding, disturbance and laying order in rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome). Gen Comp Endocrinol 162:139–145
Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Trouvé C, Quillfeldt P (2009b) Maternal deposition of yolk corticosterone in clutches of southern rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome). Horm Behav 55:500–506
Rahn H, Ar A (1974) The avian egg: incubation time and water loss. Condor 76:147–152
Rahn H, Hammel HT (1982) Incubation water loss, shell conductance, and pore dimensions in Adélie penguin eggs. Polar Biol 1:91–97
Rahn H, Paganelli CV (1989) The initial density of avian eggs derived from the tables of Schönwetter. J Ornithol 130:207–216
Raya Rey A, Trathan P, Schiavini A (2007) Inter-annual variation in provisioning behaviour of southern rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome at Staten Island, Argentina. Ibis 149:826–835
St Clair CC (1998) What is the function of first eggs in crested penguins? Auk 115:478–482
Stonehouse B (1966) Egg volumes from linear dimensions. Emu 65:227–228
van Heezik YM, Seddon PJ, du Plessis CJ, Adams NJ (1993) Differential growth of king penguin chicks in relation to date of hatching. Colonial Waterbirds 16:71–76
Viñuela J, Moreno J, Carrascal LM, Sanz JJ, Amat JA, Ferrer M, Belliure J, Cuervo JJ (1996) The effect of hatching date on parental care, chick growth, and chick mortality in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. J Zool 240:51–58
Warham J (1975) The crested penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. Macmillan, London, pp 189–269
Williams TD (1995) The penguins. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the New Island Conservation Trust for permission to work on the island. We thank Maria and Georgina Strange and Dan Birch for their support during the field season. Thanks also to Helen Otley, Falkland Islands Government and British Antarctic Survey for their logistic help. The manuscript benefited greatly from critical comments by David Carslake and two anonymous reviewers. Our study was funded by a grant provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Qu 148/1-ff) and by the FWO Flanders, Belgium. All work was approved by the Falkland Islands Government (Environmental Planning Office).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. H. Becker.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poisbleau, M., Demongin, L., Strange, I.J. et al. Is the reduced incubation time for B-eggs in Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome linked to egg density variation?. J Ornithol 152, 137–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0558-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0558-0