Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Will standardization kill innovation?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

  • 17 Altmetric

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kabasawa H (2022) MR imaging in the 21st century: technical innovation over the first two decades. Magn Reson Med Sci 21(1):71–82. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0011. (Epub 2021 Apr 16. PMID: 33867419; PMCID: PMC9199974)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. IMV (2020) MR Benchmark Report (imvinfo.com) Accessed on 7/18/2023

  3. Börnert P, Norris DG (2020) A half-century of innovation in technology-preparing MRI for the 21st century. Br J Radiol 93(1111):20200113. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200113. (Epub 2020 Jun 15. PMID: 32496816; PMCID: PMC7336051)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton J, Franson D, Seiberlich N (2017) Recent advances in parallel imaging for MRI. Prog Nucl Magn Reason Spectrosc. 101:71–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.04.002. (Epub 2017 May 2. PMID: 28844222; PMCID: PMC5927614)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang AC, Kretzler M, Sudarski S, Gulani V, Seiberlich N (2016) Sparse reconstruction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging: methods, applications, and challenges to clinical adoption. Invest Radiol 51(6):349–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000274. (PMID:27003227;PMCID:PMC4948115)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson PM, Recht MP, Knoll F (2020) Improving the speed of MRI with artificial intelligence. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 24(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400265. (Epub 2020 Jan 28. PMID: 31991448; PMCID: PMC7416509)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gyftopoulos S, Kim D, Aaltonen E, Horwitz LI (2016) Patient recall imaging in the ambulatory setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206(4):787–791. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15268. (Epub 2016 Feb 11 PMID: 26866338)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. König IR, Fuchs O, Hansen G, von Mutius E, Kopp MV (2017) What is precision medicine? Eur Respir J 50(4):1700391. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00391-2017. (PMID: 29051268)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saremi F, Grizzard JD, Kim RJ (2008) Optimizing cardiac MR imaging: practical remedies for artifacts. Radiographics 28(4):1161–1187. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.284065718. (PMID: 18635635)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Niederhauser BD, McDonald RJ, Eckel LJ, Keating GF, Broomall EM, Wetjen NM, Diehn FE, Schwartz KM, Hunt CH, Welker KM, Kallmes DF (2013) Retrospective review of rapid pediatric brain MR imaging at an academic institution including practice trends and factors affecting scan times. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(9):1836–1840. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3510. (Epub 2013 Apr 4. PMID: 23557956; PMCID: PMC7965619)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 6(2):141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0394-0. (Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25763994; PMCID: PMC4376812)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma PS, Saindane AM (2020) Standardizing magnetic resonance imaging protocols across a large radiology enterprise: barriers and solutions. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 49(5):312–316. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.012. (ISSN 0363-0188)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norris DG, Webb A (2021) This house proposes that low field and high field MRI are by destiny worst enemies, and can never be the best of friends! MAGMA 34(4):475–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00940-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-uk/magnetic-resonance-imaging/3t-mri-scanner/magnetom-cima-x. Accessed 15 July 2023

  15. https://www.philips.co.uk/healthcare/education-resources/technologies/mri/dstream. Accessed 15 July 2023

  16. Feng K, Hollingsworth NA, McDougall MP, Wright SM (2012) A 64-channel transmitter for investigating parallel transmit MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(8):2152–2160. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2196797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schiavi S, Palombo M, Zacà D, Tazza F, Lapucci C, Castellan L, Costagli M, Inglese M (2023) Mapping tissue microstructure across the human brain on a clinical scanner with soma and neurite density image metrics. Hum Brain Mapp. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26416

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Haller S, Zaharchuk G, Thomas DL, Lovblad KO, Barkhof F, Golay X (2016) Arterial spin labeling perfusion of the brain: emerging clinical applications. Radiology 281(2):337–356. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016150789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Biondetti E, Cho J, Lee H (2023) A Cerebral oxygen metabolism from MRI susceptibility. Neuroimage 276:120189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, Acevedo-Bolton G, Lawton MT, Higashida R, Smith WS, Young WL, Saloner D (2009) Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 61(2):409–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21861

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mancini L, Casagranda S, Gautier G, Peter P, Lopez B, Thorne L, McEvoy A, Miserocchi A, Samandouras G, Kitchen N, Brandner S, De Vita E, Torrealdea F, Rega M, Schmitt B, Liebig P, Sanverdi E, Golay X, Bisdas S (2022) CEST MRI provides amide/amine surrogate biomarkers for treatment-naïve glioma sub-typing. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49(7):2377–2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05676-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Khalighinejad P, Parrott D, Sherry AD (2020) Imaging tissue physiology in vivo by use of metal ion-responsive MRI contrast agents. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 13(10):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin DJ, Walter SS, Fritz J (2023) Artificial Intelligence-driven ultra-fast superresolution MRI: 10-fold accelerated musculoskeletal turbo spin echo MRI within reach. Invest Radiol 58(1):28–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89(1):212–216. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.1.212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, Günther M, Hendrikse J, Hernandez-Garcia L, Lu H, MacIntosh BJ, Parkes LM, Smits M, van Osch MJ, Wang DJ, Wong EC, Zaharchuk G (2015) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73(1):102–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Jannie P. Wijnen

  2. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

    Nicole Seiberlich

  3. University College London, London, UK

    Xavier Golay

Authors
  1. Jannie P. Wijnen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicole Seiberlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xavier Golay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Seiberlich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

No data were collected or analyzed as part of this debate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wijnen, J.P., Seiberlich, N. & Golay, X. Will standardization kill innovation?. Magn Reson Mater Phy 36, 525–528 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01115-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01115-w

Search

Navigation