Abstract
Purpose
Integrated whole-body PET/MRI tomographs have become available. PET/MR imaging has the potential to supplement, or even replace combined PET/CT imaging in selected clinical indications. However, this is true only if methodological pitfalls and image artifacts arising from novel MR-based attenuation correction (MR-AC) are fully understood.
Results
Here we present PET/MR image artifacts following routine MR-AC, as most frequently observed in clinical operations of an integrated whole-body PET/MRI system.
Conclusion
A clinical adoption of integrated PET/MRI should entail the joint image display and interpretation of MR data, MR-based attenuation maps and uncorrected plus attenuation-corrected PET images in order to recognize potential pitfalls from MR-AC and to ensure clinically accurate image interpretation.
References
Wernick MN, Aarsvold JN (2004) Emission tomography. The Fundamentals of SPECT and PET. Academic Press, ISBN: 978-0127 444 826
Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Valk PE and Maisey MN (2005) Positron emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice. Springer, London, ISBN: 978-1852 334 857
Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, Phelps ME, Kuhl DE (1979) Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 2. Effects of inaccurate attenuation correction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 3:804–814
Townsend DW (2008) Multimodality imaging of structure and function. Phys Med Biol 53:R1–R39
Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T et al (2000) A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 41:1369–1379
Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR (2007) Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 48:78S–88S
von Schulthess GK (2000) Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system. Eur Radiol 10:S377–S380
Kinahan PE, Hasegawa BH, Beyer T (2003) X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. Semin Nucl Med 33:166–179
Beyer T, Antoch G, Müller S et al (2004) Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med 45:25S–35S
Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Judenhofer MS (2008) Latest advances in molecular imaging instrumentation. J Nucl Med 49:5S–23S
Beyer T, Freudenberg LS, Czernin J, Townsend DW (2011) The future of hybrid imaging-part 3: PET/MR, small-animal imaging and beyond. Insights Imaging 2:235–246
Kalemis A, Delattre BM, Heinzer S (2012) Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner—concept, clinical use and optimisations after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer’s perspective. Magn Reson Mater Phy (Epub ahead of print Aug 7)
Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B et al (2011) Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med 52:1914–1922
Hofmann M, Bezrukov I, Mantlik F et al (2011) MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods. J Nucl Med 52:1392–1399
Schulz V, Torres-Espallardo I, Renisch S et al (2010) Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:138–152
Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G et al (2009) Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med 50:520–526
Sattler B, Jochimsen T, Barthel H et al (2012) Physical and organizational provision for installation, regulatory requirements and implementation of a simultaneous hybrid PET/MR-imaging system in an integrated research and clinical setting. Magn Reson Mater Phy (paper included in this issue)
Keereman V, Mollet P, Berker Y, Schulz V, Vandenberghe S et al (2012) Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET-MR. Magn Reson Mater Phy (paper included in this issue)
Delso G, Martinez-Möller A, Bundschuh RA, Nekolla SG, Ziegler SI (2010) The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. Med Phys 37:2804–2812
Nuyts J, Dupont P, Stroobants S, Benninck R, Mortelmans L, Suetens P (1999) Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:393–403
Eiber M, Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M et al (2011) Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions. Eur J Nuc Med Mol Imaging 38:1691–1701
Guérin B, Cho S, Chun SY et al (2011) Nonrigid PET motion compensation in the lower abdomen using simultaneous tagged-MRI and PET imaging. Med Phys 38:3025–3038
Keereman V, Holen RV, Mollet P, Vandenberghe S et al (2011) The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. Med Phys 38:6010–6019
Samarin A, Burger C, Wollenweber SD et al (2012) PET/MR imaging of bone lesions—implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:1154–1160
Larsson A et al (2012) Evaluation of an attenuation correction method for brain PET/MRI based on substitute CT-imag. Magn Reson Mater Phy (paper included in this issue)
Berker Y, Franke J, Salomon A (2012) MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence. J Nucl Med 53:796–804
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keller, S.H., Holm, S., Hansen, A.E. et al. Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI. Magn Reson Mater Phy 26, 173–181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-012-0345-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-012-0345-4