Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the preferred scout sagittal orientation for temporal lobe imaging with magnetic resonance

  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oblique magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal lobe (tilted orientation) requires a stable reference line with minimum variability. In the clinical setting, where several observers carry out examination of the patients, there is a need to assure minimum inter-observer variability, in order to obtain comparable tilted anatomical planes. This is particularly relevant when performing quantitative imaging (qMRI) of the hippocampus, amygdala and para-hippocampal cortices. In this study, eight experienced observers tested the stability of four sagittal reference lines by manually tracing the posterior commissure-obex (PC-OB) line, the line tangential to the anterior surface of the pons at its most convex point and the lines orthogonal to the main axis of both hippocampi, in ten exams of healthy subjects. The stability of the tracing was assessed by comparing the inter-observer variability expressed by the variances of the measurements. The observers’ performance was assessed by comparing the precision of the tracing for each line. We tested the results statistically using Bartlett’s test (analysis of the variances of the four lines) followed by Fischer–Snedecor (in order to compare the two lines that had the smallest variance). The PC-OB line and the line tangential to the anterior surface of the pons had smaller inter-observer variances than the orthogonal lines (p<0.01). In addition, the variance of the PC-OB line was smaller than that of the line tangential to the pons (p<0.01). There were no significant intra-observer differences in the precision of tracing of any of the lines. We show quantitatively that the PC-OB line is the scout reference that yields the smallest inter-observer variance. Thus, this line should be preferred to improve the reproducibility of temporal lobe imaging while performing tilted coronal and axial sequences, to make quantitative assessments of the hippocampus, amygdala and para-hippocampal cortices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falconer MA, Serafetinides EA, Corsellis JAN (1964) Etiology and pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy. Arch Neurol 10:233–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouton PR, Martin LJ, Calhoun ME, Dal Forno G, Price DL (1998) Cognitive decline strongly correlates with cortical atrophy in Alzheimer’s dementia. Neurobiol Aging 19:371–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amaral DG (1987) Memory: anatomical organization of candidate brain regions. In: Plum F, Mountcastle V (eds) Higher functions of the brain, handbook of physiology, Part I. Am Physiol Soc, Washington, pp211–294

  4. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. (2001) Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 58:1985–1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gur RE, Turetsky BI, Cowell PE, et al. (2000) Temporolimbic volume reductions in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:769–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bigler ED, Blatter DD, Anderson CV, et al. (1997) Hippocampal volume in normal aging and traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:11–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gloor P (1997) The temporal lobe and the limbic system. Oxford University Press, New York

  8. Tofts PS (2003) Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bronen RA, Cheung G, Charles JT, et al. (1991) Imaging findings in hippocampal sclerosis: correlation with pathology. Am J Neuroradiol 12:933–940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jack CR, Petersen RC, O’Brien PC, Tangalos EG (1992) MR-based hippocampal volumetry in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 42:183–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soininen HS, Partanen K, Pitkänen A, et al. (1994) Volumetric MRI analysis of the amygdala and the hippocampus in subjects with age-associated memory impairment: correlation to visual and verbal memory. Neurology 44:1660–1668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velakoulis D, Pantelis C, McGorry PD, et al. (1999) Hippocampal volume in first-episode psychoses and chronic schizophrenia: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56:133–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Briellmann RS, Kalnins RM, Berkovic SF, Jackson GD (2002) Hippocampal pathology in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: T2-weighted signal change reflects dentate gliosis. Neurology 58:265–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng TC, Comair YG, Xue M, et al. (1994) Temporal lobe epilepsy: presurgical localization with proton chemical shift imaging. Radiology 193:465–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oppenheim C, Dormont D, Biondi A, et al. (1998) Loss of digitations of the hippocampal head on high-resolution fast spin-echo MR: a sign of mesial temporal sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:457–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson GD (1995) The diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis: other techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 13:1081–1093

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JH, Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Osumi AK, Lee N (1995) Clinical significance of asymmetry of the fornix and mamillary body on MR in hippocampal sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:509–515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jack CR Jr, Rydberg CH, Krecke KN, et al. (1996) Mesial temporal sclerosis: diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 199:367–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Achten E, Boon P, De Poorter J, et al. (1995) An MR protocol for presurgical evaluation of patients with complex partial seizures of temporal lobe origin. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:1201–1213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watson C, Andermann F, Gloor P, et al. (1992) Anatomic basis of amygdaloid and hippocampal volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 42:1743–1750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meiners LC, Valk J, van Gils PG, et al. (1997) Assessment of the preferred plane and sequence in the depiction of mesial temporal sclerosis using magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 32:268–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson GD, Connelly A, Duncan JS, Grunewald RA, Gadian DG (1993) Detection of hippocampal pathology in intractable partial epilepsy: increased sensitivity with quantitative magnetic resonance T2 relaxometry. Neurology 43:1793–1799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tamraz JC, Comair YG (2000) Cephalic reference lines suitable for neuroimaging. In: Tamraz JC, Comair YG (eds) Atlas of regional anatomy of the brain using MRI – with functional correlations. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp.11–50

  24. Bartlett PA, Richardson MP, Duncan JS (2002) Measurement of amygdala T2 relaxation time in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:753–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duvernoy HM (1998) The human hippocampus. Functional anatomy, vascularization and serial sections with MRI. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  27. Du AT, Schuff N, Amend D, et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:441–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Von Oertzen J, Urbach H, Jungbluth S, et al. (2002) Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:643–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Capizzano AA, Vermathen P, Laxer KD, et al. (2001) Temporal lobe epilepsy: qualitative reading of 1H MR spectroscopic images for presurgical evaluation. Radiology 218:144–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Novak K, Czech T, Prayer D, et al. (2002) Individual variations in the sulcal anatomy of the basal temporal lobe and its relevance for epilepsy surgery: an anatomical study performed using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 96:464–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Insausti R, Juottonen K, Soininen H, et al. (1998) MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:659–671

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Gonçalves Pereira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pereira, P., Oliveira, E. & Secca, M. Assessment of the preferred scout sagittal orientation for temporal lobe imaging with magnetic resonance. MAGMA 18, 19–25 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-004-0074-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-004-0074-4

Keywords

Navigation