Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating multi-frequency satellite phase biases of BeiDou using maximal decorrelated linear ambiguity combinations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving ambiguity resolution (AR) in multi-frequency undifferenced and uncombined precise point positioning (PPP) benefits from accurate uncalibrated phase delays (UPD), which are often estimated from linear combinations of float ambiguities. The traditional linear ambiguity combinations for estimating these UPDs in case of triple-frequency observations are typically extra-wide-lane, wide-lane, and L1 combinations. We proposed the method for estimating UPDs from triple-frequency ambiguities using maximal decorrelated linear ambiguity combinations obtained by the least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment Z-transformation. To validate the quality and availability of estimating UPDs for the BeiDou navigation satellite system, based on maximal decorrelated linear ambiguity combinations, tests using observations from stations of the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China and the Asia-Pacific Reference Frame project are performed using undifferenced and uncombined PPP-AR. The results show the internal precision of combined satellite UPDs estimated from the maximal decorrelated linear ambiguity combinations is better than that estimated from traditional combinations in terms of temporal stability and RMS of posteriori residuals. Furthermore, the statistical results also demonstrated that triple-frequency PPP-AR using the improved UPDs reduces the average convergence time by 8.9 and 12.3% in horizontal and vertical directions, and also improves the positioning accuracy for 3 h of observations by 11.1, 9.1 and 8.3% in the east, north and up directions, respectively, compared with triple-frequency PPP-AR using the UPDs derived from the traditional combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Short note: a global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications. J Geod 81(10):679–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins P, Bisnath S, Lahaye F, Héroux P (2010) Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing. Navigation 57(2):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge P, Tiberius C (1996) The lambda method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects. Technical Report LGR Series, No. 12

  • Deng Z, Zhao Q, Springer T, Prange L, Uhlemann M (2014) Orbit and clock determination-BeiDou. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop 2014, June 23–27, 2014, Pasadena, USA

  • Dilssner F, Springer T, Schönemann E, Enderle W (2014) Estimation of satellite Antenna Phase Center corrections for BeiDou. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop 2014, June 23–27, 2014, Pasadena, USA

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Shi C (2017) Rapid initialization of real-time PPP by resolving undifferenced GPS and GLONASS ambiguities simultaneously. J Geod 91(4):361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu S, Lou Y, Shi C, Liu J (2015) Beidou phase bias estimation and its application in precise point positioning with triple-frequency observable. J Geod 89(10):979–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Zhang XH, Wang JL, Ren XD (2016) Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning. J Geod 90(11):1223–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang X (2012) Improving the estimation of uncalibrated fractional phase offsets for PPP ambiguity resolution. J Navig 65(3):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Fritsche M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang X, Ren X, Zuo X, Pan Y (2016) Generating gps satellite fractional cycle bias for ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning. GPS Solut 20(4):771–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li X, Yuan Y, Zhang K, Zhang X, Wickert J (2017) Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo. J Geod 92(6):579–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang X, Ge M, Schuh H (2018) Three-frequency BDS precise point positioning ambiguity resolution based on raw observables. J Geod 5:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Yuan Y, Zhang B, Wang N, Tan B, Chen Y (2016) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning (MGPPP) using raw observations. J Geod 91(3):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Zhang B, Khodabandeh A, Odolinski R, Teunissen PJG (2016) On the estimability of parameters in undifferenced, uncombined GNSS network and PPP-RTK user models by means of S-system theory. J Geod 90(1):15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Khodabandeh A, Nadarajah N, Choudhury M, Zhang B, Li W, Teunissen PJG (2017) PPP-RTK by means of S-system theory: Australian network and user demonstration. J Spat Sci 62(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions 2010 (IERS Technical Note No. 36). Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, p 179

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann E, Becker M, Springer T (2011) A new approach for GNSS analysis in a multi-GNSS and multi-signal environment. J Geod Sci 1(3):204–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70(1–2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (1997) On the GPS widelane and its decorrelating property. J Geod 71(9):577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Joosten P, Tiberius C (2002) A comparison of TCAR, CIR and LAMBDA GNSS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 2002, Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, September 24–27, pp 2799–2808

  • Wu J, Wu S, Hajj G, Bertiger W, Lichten S (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geod 18:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Teunissen PJG, Odijk D (2011) A novel undifferenced PPP-RTK concept. J Navig 64(S1):S180–S191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors were grateful to the many individuals and organizations who contributed to the International GNSS Service. We also gratefully acknowledged the use of Generic Mapping Tool (GMT) software. This research was funded by National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant no. 41825009), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (nos. 2016YFB0501803, 2017YFB0503402), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41774034), and the project of Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (no. 2018010401011270).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohong Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, G., Zhang, X. & Li, P. Estimating multi-frequency satellite phase biases of BeiDou using maximal decorrelated linear ambiguity combinations. GPS Solut 23, 42 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0836-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0836-0

Keywords

Navigation