Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Privacy-Preserving Breast Cancer Classification: A Federated Transfer Learning Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is deadly cancer causing a considerable number of fatalities among women in worldwide. To enhance patient outcomes as well as survival rates, early and accurate detection is crucial. Machine learning techniques, particularly deep learning, have demonstrated impressive success in various image recognition tasks, including breast cancer classification. However, the reliance on large labeled datasets poses challenges in the medical domain due to privacy issues and data silos. This study proposes a novel transfer learning approach integrated into a federated learning framework to solve the limitations of limited labeled data and data privacy in collaborative healthcare settings. For breast cancer classification, the mammography and MRO images were gathered from three different medical centers. Federated learning, an emerging privacy-preserving paradigm, empowers multiple medical institutions to jointly train the global model while maintaining data decentralization. Our proposed methodology capitalizes on the power of pre-trained ResNet, a deep neural network architecture, as a feature extractor. By fine-tuning the higher layers of ResNet using breast cancer datasets from diverse medical centers, we enable the model to learn specialized features relevant to different domains while leveraging the comprehensive image representations acquired from large-scale datasets like ImageNet. To overcome domain shift challenges caused by variations in data distributions across medical centers, we introduce domain adversarial training. The model learns to minimize the domain discrepancy while maximizing classification accuracy, facilitating the acquisition of domain-invariant features. We conducted extensive experiments on diverse breast cancer datasets obtained from multiple medical centers. Comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the proposed approach against traditional standalone training and federated learning without domain adaptation. When compared with traditional models, our proposed model showed a classification accuracy of 98.8% and a computational time of 12.22 s. The results showcase promising enhancements in classification accuracy and model generalization, underscoring the potential of our method in improving breast cancer classification performance while upholding data privacy in a federated healthcare environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Wang X, Ahmad I, Javeed D, Zaidi SA, Alotaibi FM, Ghoneim ME, Daradkeh YI, Asghar J, Eldin ET: Intelligent Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Detection. Electronics 11(17):27–67, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saber A, Sakr M, Abo-Seida OM, Keshk A, Chen H: A novel deep-learning model for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer using the transfer–learning technique. IEEE Access 9:71194–71209, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hameed Z, Zahia S, Garcia-Zapirain B, Javier Aguirre J, Maria Vanegas A: Breast cancer histopathology image classification using an ensemble of deep learning models. Sensors 20(16):43–73, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Egwom OJ, Hassan M, Tanimu JJ, Hamada M, Ogar OM: An LDA–SVM machine learning model for breast cancer classification. BioMedInformatics 2(3):345–358, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirra I, Ahmad M, Hussain A, Ashraf MU, Saeed IA, Qadri SF, Alghamdi AM, Alfakeeh AS: Breast cancer classification from histopathological images using patch-based deep learning modeling. IEEE Access 9:24273–24287, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang J, Qin Z, Xue L, Lin X, Shen X: Efficient and privacy-preserving decision tree classification for health monitoring systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8(16):12528–12539, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ragab DA, Attallah O, Sharkas M, Ren J, Marshall S: A framework for breast cancer classification using multi-DCNNs. Computers in Biology and Medicine 131:104–245, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu M, Hu L, Tang Y, Wang C, He Y, Zeng C, Lin K, He Z, Huo W: A deep learning method for breast cancer classification in the pathology images. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 26(10):5025–5032, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumbhare S, Kathole AB, Shinde S: Federated learning aided breast cancer detection with intelligent Heuristic-based deep learning framework. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 86:105–080, 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan YN, Tinh VP, Lam PD, Nam NH, Khoa TA: A Transfer Learning Approach to Breast Cancer Classification in a Federated Learning Framework. IEEE Access 11:27462–27476, 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li L, Xie N, Yuan S: A Federated Learning Framework for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification. Electronics 11(22):37–67, 2022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peta J, Koppu S: Breast Cancer Classification In Histopathological Images Using Federated Learning Framework. IEEE Access, Vol.11, pp.61866 - 61880, 2023.

  13. Salmeron JL, Arévalo I, Ruiz-Celma A: Benchmarking federated strategies in Peer-to-Peer Federated learning for biomedical data. Heliyon,Vol.9, No. 6, e16925 2023.

  14. Jiménez-Sánchez A, Tardy M, Ballester MAG, Mateus D, Piella G: Memory-aware curriculum federated learning for breast cancer classification. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 229:107–318, 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmad N, Asghar S, Gillani SA: Transfer learning-assisted multi-resolution breast cancer histopathological images classification. The Visual Computer 38(8):2751–2770, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ayana G, Park J, Jeong JW, Choe SW: A novel multistage transfer learning for ultrasound breast cancer image classification. Diagnostics 12(1):13–5, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ming W, Li F, Zhu Y, Bai Y, Gu W, Liu Y, Sun X, Liu X, Liu H: Predicting hormone receptors and PAM50 subtypes of breast cancer from multi-scale lesion images of DCE-MRI with transfer learning technique. Computers in biology and medicine 150:106–147, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alhussan AA, Abdelhamid AA, Towfek SK, Ibrahim A, Abualigah L, Khodadadi N, Khafaga DS, Al-Otaibi S, Ahmed AE: Classification of Breast Cancer Using Transfer Learning and Advanced Al-Biruni Earth Radius Optimization. Biomimetics 8(3):2–70, 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aljuaid H, Alturki N, Alsubaie N, Cavallaro L, Liotta A: Computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer classification using deep neural networks and transfer learning. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 223:106–951, 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alsolami AS, Shalash W, Alsaggaf W, Ashoor S, Refaat H, Elmogy M: king Abdulaziz university breast cancer mammogram dataset (KAU-BCMD). Data 6(11):11–1, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sambasivam GAOGD, Opiyo GD: A predictive machine learning application in agriculture: Cassava disease detection and classification with imbalanced dataset using convolutional neural networks. Egyptian informatics journal 22(1):27–34, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chicco D, Jurman G: The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC genomics 21(1):1–13, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mukti IZ, Biswas D: Transfer learning based plant diseases detection using ResNet50. In 2019 4th International conference on electrical information and communication technology (EICT) (pp. 1–6). IEEE, 2019 December.

  24. Montaha S, Azam S, Rafid AKMRH, Ghosh P, Hasan MZ, Jonkman M, De Boer F: BreastNet18: A high accuracy fine-tuned VGG16 model evaluated using ablation study for diagnosing breast cancer from enhanced mammography images. Biology 10(12):13–47, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Senthil Pandi, S Senthilselvi, A Kumaragurubaran, T Dhanasekaran, S Self-attention-based generative adversarial network optimized with color harmony algorithm for brain tumor classification Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2024.2312363

  26. Senthil Pandi, Sankareshwaran Gitanjali, Jayaraman Pounambal, Muthukumar ArivuSelvan, Krishnan (2023) Optimizing rice plant disease detection with crossover boosted artificial hummingbird algorithm based AX-RetinaNet Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11612-z

  27. S., Senthil Pandi A., Senthilselvi M., Maragatharajan I., Manju (2022) An optimal self adaptive deep neural network and spine‐kernelled chirplet transform for image registration Summary Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 34(27). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.v34.27 https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.7297

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS, GDD, RV, and JJ agreed on the content of the study. SS, GDD, RV, and JJ collected all the data for analysis. SS agreed on the methodology. SS, GDD, RV, and JJ completed the analysis based on agreed steps. Results and conclusions are discussed and written together. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selvakanmani S.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

S, S., Dharani Devi, G., V, R. et al. Privacy-Preserving Breast Cancer Classification: A Federated Transfer Learning Approach. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01035-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01035-8

Keywords

Navigation